You are here:   Madonna > Underrated: Nadezhda Tolokonnikova
 
 
It was a striking moment in the history of Russian dissidence. On December 27, 2013, three days after their release from remote penal colonies, Nadezhda  (known as Nadya) Tolokonnikova and Maria (known as Masha) Alyokhina were in a shiny Moscow TV studio, with Vladimir Bukovsky on the line from England. Bukovsky spent 12 years in Soviet prisons and psychiatric hospitals in the 1960s and 70s as punishment for repeated acts of public protest. Since his release in a prisoner swap in 1976, he has lived in Cambridge. In their TV press conference Tolokonnikova named Bukovsky as her hero: a true defender of human rights who never abandoned political activism. In her 21 months in prison, she had read and reread his autobiography, she said, leaving it as a precious gift to a fellow inmate on her release. In Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina Bukovsky recognised his own kind. The elderly dissident spoke with them naturally, as equals. He told them "from the heart" that he knew how hard it would be to adapt to life outside prison, that freedom would bring a mass of cares. He wished them luck. 

Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina have confronted the challenges of freedom with the same cool demeanour that they displayed during their trial and imprisonment. In their tour of Europe and the US in the days before the Sochi Winter Olympics, politicians, human rights activists and rock stars lined up to bask in their moral authority. The young women make a good double act but Tolokonnikova is the true performer. She combines beauty and charisma with a remarkable mind, and knows instinctively how to take the high ground. The Putin regime "did not just make Tolokonnikova a star, it turned her into a saint," the writer Dmitri Bykov said during her prison hunger strike. "She is now the best-known Russian after Putin himself."

To capture imaginations is to be caught up in other people's fantasies and vanities. On an Irish chat show, the hapless presenter told Tolokonnikova that Madonna had described Pussy Riot as "fellow freedom fighters". Incredulous for a moment, she threw back her head and laughed. Again, she explained (as she had done to the judge who sentenced her in July 2012 for "hooliganism motivated by religious hatred") that the "punk prayer", "Mother of God, Drive Away Putin", was not an attack on religion, but a political protest. Days later, at an Amnesty benefit in Brooklyn's vast Barclays Center, Madonna introduced Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina with a foul-mouthed speech about the dangers she herself had faced for the sake of freedom. In T-shirts decorated with the cross of the Teutonic knights, they thanked her graciously and proceeded to read aloud the court statements of Russia's May 6 prisoners, incarcerated for street protests since 2012.

Back home, Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina face a tougher crowd. Many believe they are in the pay of the West. More sympathetic members of the intelligentsia cannot reconcile the dazzling moral clarity and erudition of their court statements with the antics in the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, never mind Tolokonnikova's participation (with her husband Petr Verzilov) in a notorious sex protest in the State Museum of Biology in 2008. Others wait for the magic to wear off. "Why is everyone so obsessed with those stupid girls?" the Moscow TV anchor and socialite Ksenia Sobchak reportedly complained.  

Other members of Pussy Riot have disowned Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina for succumbing to a cult of personality. Undeterred, the two showed up in Sochi in their Pussy Riot balaclavas. This is the kind of stubborn dissident persistence that Bukovsky taught. The local police obliged: they were first detained, then horsewhipped by Cossacks, creating another colourful spectacle for the assembled global media. They incorporated footage of it all into their song "Putin will teach you to love the Motherland".

In her excellent new book Words will Break Cement: The Passion of Pussy Riot (Granta Books, £9.99), Masha Gessen finds evidence enough of genius in the "punk prayer" itself, which she calls "a great work of art . . . a miracle". The dissident priest Gleb Yakunin regards the performance in the cathedral as a miracle in the full Christian sense of the word. Pussy Riot's words "black cassock, gold epaulettes" drove "to the very heart of Patriarch Kirill", he said. During their imprisonment, Yakunin composed a verse cycle in Pussy Riot's honour, The Pussiniad. He too did time in prisons and labour camps in the Soviet period. In 1993, five years after his amnesty, the Russian Orthodox Church excommunicated him for exposing its infiltration by the KGB. Yakunin had unmasked Kirill as a high-ranking agent codenamed Mikhailov.

"Passion, honesty and naivety are superior to hypocrisy, mendacity and false modesty that disguises crime," Tolokonnikova said in court. These are words for a dissident to live by. Yakunin considers Tolokonnikova a person graced with "exceptional gifts". He believes that once they have established their new human rights group, Justice Zone, she and Alyokhina will found a political party — a "genuine Christian democratic party" — that will drive out Putin and transform Russia. That really would be a miracle. 
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
April 6th, 2014
6:04 PM
Dear Hegel's Advocate. Let me explain more clearly. When I refer to the 'commentariat' I refer to that group of individuals that exists to act as a filter in respect of the world, evident on both the traditional 'left' and 'right' of politics. On the left we have individuals such as Yasmin Alibhai Brown, an intellectually vacuous individual whose position appears to stem from a vacillating nodal point based on whichever label is most appropriate - 'I am a woman / Black / Muslim / Feminist / Leftist'. Julie Bindel (a similarly minded individual) recently appeared on the BBC's 'Question Time' and described Nigel Farage as a racist and misogynist, with no supporting evidence and very little by way of challenge by the BBC (the liberal bias of the BBC is ripe for further exploration). Despite such opinions 'Standpoint' chose to publish her article on FGM, which was undoubtedly motivated by her continuing ire with younger emerging members of her selected political milieu. The delicious irony of 'Standpoint' featuring a photograph of Laurie Penny must have evidently been lost somewhere..... On the right we have Douglas Murray, an individual apparently concerned with Islam, yet he manages to exhibit an astonishing intellectual ignorance and depth regarding the subject, relying on a populist discourse (despite his apparent years of 'thinking' on the subject). When not musing on Islam for 'Standpoint' his articles are little more than fractured observational pieces of questionable value. Daniel Johnson's stated intention that 'Standpoint' stands for the defence of Western civilization has been made many times, yet his knowledge of Islam is equally suspect. Both Murray and Johnson, however, consider themselves as qualified to tackle the subject (presumably based on their Oxbridge education). Is this really the bulwark against the supposed 'bararoi'?! I once again urge you to watch the 'Intelligence Squared' debate for evidence of how poorly this apparent intellectual elite performs. Once you have watched the debate I will engage further with you. I will say however, that should you want an article written by me please seek to commission it in the usual way.

hegel`s advocate
April 1st, 2014
5:04 PM
Standpoint fails to "move beyond the progressive agenda of the `commentariat`" ? It has an agenda that is "intellectually shallow and vacuous" ? The former is an interesting generalisation ( The Progressive Agenda of The Commentariat being a good title for an article) and the latter is just a lie. If Anonymous has an article for publication why doesn`t he publish it himself (as an e-mail newsletter for starters - nothing could be easier!)and we can read it. Otherwise we will have no evidence of his "authentic experience across specific areas of relevance to `Islam`" or anything at all.

Anonymous
April 1st, 2014
12:04 AM
Dear Hegel's Advocate. Let us agree to cut across hyperbole. Let us concentrate on your statement that, '[...] Standpoint is not Utopia'. I am sure that such an irony would not have been lost on More, but this is a magazine which has claimed to represent the 'very best of Western values', to act as a bulwark against the supposedly 'progressive left'. This is admirable, and if serious, then there must be an expectation of being taken to task. Despite such an acclamation the magazine continually fails to move beyond the progressive agenda of the 'commentariat', Douglas Murray writes provocative copy regarding 'Islam' and 'Islamism' based on no academic expertise and no authentic experience rooted in engagement regarding the subject at hand. Ayaan Hirsi Ali is commended, yet on the evidence of her public appearances she has little to offer except culturally conceited blandishments, with little intellectual weight to support them. It is of comfort, to her supporters (including Murray) that she is a woman and black, thereby apparently sidestepping accusations of cultural and racial insensitivity. I welcome the fact that an engagement is to be had against the cliches espoused by the 'left' in the United Kingdom, I have authentic experience across specific areas of relevance to 'Islam', but 'Standpoint' continues to promote an agenda that is intellectually shallow and vacuous, equally as pernicious as that of their critics. Unlike Murray et al, I know about that which I speak.

hegel`s advocate
March 29th, 2014
7:03 PM
Let`s say Anonymous is right and that there is "a discursive space that remains resolutely empty,devoid of all rational engagement" . Is that not true of Islam,Christianity and "western Buddhism" ? It might even be a definition of their God/truth/so-called sartori. The present catastrophe of Syria could be seen as an extreme consequence of that emptiness devoid of all rational engagement. And the same holds true for "intellectual vacuity and inconsistency" - Standpoint is not Utopia? It doesn`t claim to be. But it`s a bloody good magazine! Since Anonymous has not changed his mind about the exceptional nature of Nadya and Pussy Riot art and philosophising then so be it. Akiane Kramarik in Idaho,USA is nothing exceptional either ? The scum `kremlin` thugs who attacked Nadya and Maria in a café obviously want them to leave Russia. If they do or don`t I will still support their `Justice,beauty and truth` campaign. Theologically speaking in blaspheming against the Pussy Riot artists Russia has blasphemed against the Holy Spirit. Jesus says there is no forgiveness for this sin. In Zizek`s atheist use of the term `Holy Spirit` this is also true. Without Pussy Riot art and philosophising will Russia descend into some dystopian jingoised `Syria`? Looks like it. The greatest atheist in Russia is Patriarch Kirill and the most culturally and politically unpatriotic is Putin. On this subject Standpoint should get a best front cover award and another one for intellectual excellence. On the subject of the death/absence of any avant-garde I think Uruguay and Israel are the avant-garde. But Uruguay isn`t surrounded by regimes out to destroy it and turn it into slums. In Salford,Manchester,Bez (ex-Happy Mondays band)is campaigning to become the (independent,green) MP. Advocating that England should be more like 21st century Uruguay and London more like Montevideo than Dubai makes sense. Otherwise it`s the 20th century degraded repeat of the punch and judy/ Left versus Right wing politics (thesis and antithesis) with no 21st century materialist synthesis in sight. `Shitsville or Uruguay ?`: A new trending question ?

Anonymous
March 29th, 2014
1:03 AM
Dear Hegel's Advocate. I see that you read my response and decided to (once again) quote from apparent luminaries of a discourse you hold attractive, which is all well and good. The problem is that once you move beyond your quotations there is a a discursive space that remains resolutely empty, devoid of any form of rational engagement. Whilst it may be useful to have considered and reflected on the thinking of others there must be a space for the critical reflection of your own mind, which appears (across all of your entries regarding 'Standpoint Magazine') seriously lacking. You are, of course, not alone in displaying this attribute - see Douglass Murray and Ayaan Hirsi Ali in the 'Intelligence Squared' debate regarding Islam for a further example. The issue for 'Standpoint' remains the same, an intellectual vacuity and inconsistency which pains those who actually do care and consider the discursive narratives of apparent interest to the magazine.

hegel`s advocate
March 27th, 2014
7:03 PM
Julie Burchill will confirm my quoting her stating " Pussy Riot are splendid young women and the younger generation feminists are brilliant." Anonymous is "happy to engage" with Zizek,Burchill,Paglia etc but is only mentioming them because I have. I`m not placing the response of Anonymous in an anti-feminist discourse just asking why he shows no appreciation of any of the feminists,luminaries or not. And now my joke about male circumcision is "sexist". And I`m a fool. Might as well throw in islamophobic,zionist whore/stooge and degenerate artist. And I`m going to Hell too (according to Catholicism) as I`m a `lapsed catholic` . Not a bad T-Shirt ! Especially since the greatest atheists are Islam and Catholicism. Now Anonymous has concentrated on my responses for a moment perhaps he can see the people of Uruguay mentioned. So far neither Pussy Riot,Putin, Zizek,Cameron,Burchill,Paglia,Femen,the Labour Party,Green Party nor Anonymous see or hear anything historically innovative happening there. Assuming Anonymous lives in England he has expressed no appreciation of any art or artists in it. I`m contradicting Tim Marlow,the Royal Academy and all intellectual,political and spiritual `historical provincialism`. It can be summed up in Zizek`s " The 20th century is over." Celebrity personality duels (between individuals,ideologies or nations)are the mainstream `news`. What can the whole of Islam,Christianity and `western Buddhism`/Capitalism enjoyably learn from the people of Uruguay ? Thesis,antithesis and synthesis ! The 21st century ! Yesterday I recordered the first new music track for an ep with an artist/musician friend. Once the artwork for the cd cover is completed it will be for sale. Julie Burchill said her only criticism of Israel is that "it could do with being a little bit bigger." I totally agree and add Uruguay to that!

Anonymous
March 26th, 2014
8:03 PM
Dear Hegel's Advocate. Let us work through your response. First we have your appeal to (apparent) luminaries of Feminism, which indicates a sadly literal reading of my earlier criticism. 'Pussy Riot' is described as, '[...] brilliant' (apparently quoting Burchill) with no supporting evidence. Finally I (apparently) have nothing to say to Nadya, Burchill or Zizek. I am happy to engage with all of them, but for the moment I want to concentrate on you. Your response appears to be centered on placing my position within an anti-feminist discourse. Am I right in assuming that you are the same Hegel's Advocate who wrote the following: "It`s only a joke about male circumcision but don`t most women like 20% off everything?" Good old fashioned sexist 'humour', no? Fool.

hegel`s advocate
March 20th, 2014
2:03 PM
Anonymous sees the beauty of Nadya but listens not. The thousands who do listen ,admire and love her are wankers according to him. Presumably all fans of Camille Paglia,Julie Burchill and other prominent feminists are all wankers too.And everyone at Feminist Times? Is Anonymous simply a misogynist and anti-feminist? I think Russia is stuck in it`s 20th century mix (as are most countries) and Pussy Riot are its best artist-philosophers. Uruguay is the first 21st century civilisation. Rather than engage with anything Nadya says about philosophising together Anonymous chucks in the Occupy movement. Nobody has said Pussy Riot are the big solution but I do entirely agree with Julie Burchill who says Pussy Riot are "splendid young women" and that the younger generation of feminists are "brilliant". Anonymous has nothing to say to Nadya (or Julie B or Zizek.)

Anonymous
March 19th, 2014
8:03 PM
Dear oh dear, another piece of Standpoint waffle motivated by the love of an (admittedly pleasing)feminine aesthetic. The onanism on display is simialr to that witnessed in respect of 'Occupy London' - you know, the end of capitalism and all that stuff......

Billy Bob
March 19th, 2014
1:03 PM
Tsk, tsk, Observer of the Scene, you assume that my praise for Tolokonnikova is automatically a comparison of venal Russia with virtuous West. It isn't. I reacted to your sweeping dismissal of an intelligent, articulate and brave woman as an 'adolescent exhibitionist'. That comment lacks empathy and suggests that you have not read much about or by Tolokonnikova. Start with her closing statement in the trial. It's impressive stuff, whether you agree with her or not. She deserves more serious and empathetic treatment than your casual and rather patronising dismissal offers.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.