You are here:   Civilisation >  Books > A Novelist With Ice In His Heart
 

But these are false notes in an otherwise fine performance. This is a novel rich in subterranean meaning. It's a novel, in part, about reading and writing. As a place name Novilla sounds a lot like the word "novella". David and Simón learn a new language in this new place. Initially Simón feels that the "words lack weight", but by the midpoint of the novel he tells David that in the next life they "may have to learn Chinese". And in the final chapter David, Simón and Inés reach a place called Nueva Esperanza, or New Hope. This movement reflects the novelist's work. The patient mastery of a new language-the language of Novilla, or of this particular novel-moves towards the contemplation of the next.

Coetzee is a moralist, and beneath the surface of The Childhood of Jesus he hides a chilly lesson. David is an imaginative boy growing up in an unimaginative place. He has taught himself to read with a children's edition of Don Quixote. At school he refuses to apply himself and shows a resistance to "the science of numbers". When he invents his own language-a language incomprehensible to others-he's warned he will be "shunned". Before he's taken from home and sent to Punto Arenas, a "special school" for troublesome students, David speaks like a persecuted writer: "Do they want to send me to Punto Arenas because of my stories?" This novel is a parable about the writer's place in a world ruled by cold rationalism. It's a chilly story, like so many of Coetzee's. Yet there is some hope for David, and some warmth in the light of his imagination.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
R Taus
March 2nd, 2013
10:03 PM
The last Master-Craftsman to have won the Booker Prize remains V S Naipaul.What passes for serious contemporary fiction is worse than fashionable gimmick: it is a trendy self-obsession which finds validity within a closed, incestuous circle of a very vain fraternity. The persecuted writer as a latter-day Christ...One couldn't, if one tried, come up with a more narcissistic motif - the deeply immodest gesture of one of today's literary Priest-Kings usurping for himself the mantle of cosmic suffering. I remember reading `the Davidson Affair' as a kid and being admonished for reading `trash'.Granted Stuart Jackman was no Saul Bellow, but he was able to tell a story without letting his ego wrest away the narrative.Nor did the journeyman win the Nobel Prize. I look forward to the Coatzee episode of your `over-rated' -reputations feature.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.