You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > The Drumming of an Army
 


It never rains: Brisbane, January 2011 

Poetry, said Auden, makes nothing happen. Usually it doesn't, but sometimes a poem gets quoted in a national argument because everybody knows it, or at least part of it, and for the occasion a few lines of familiar poetry suddenly seem the best way of summing up a viewpoint. Just such an occasion has occurred recently in Australia.  By the time the heavy rains first hit Queensland early this year, the theory of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW, to borrow the unlovely acronym) was ceasing to exercise unquestioned thrall in the minds of Australia's progressive voters. But spokespersons for the Green party clung on to it, encouraged by the fact that the theory, in its Climate Change form, was readily applicable to any circumstances.  

Before the floods, proponents of the CAGW view had argued that there would never be enough rain again, because of Climate Change. When it became clear that there might be more than enough rain, the view was adapted: the floods, too, were the result of Climate Change. In other words, they were something unprecedented. Those opposing this view — those who believed that in Australia nothing could be less unprecedented than a flood unless it was a drought — took to quoting Dorothea Mackellar's poem "My Country", which until recently every Australian youngster was obliged to hear recited in school. In my day we sometimes had to recite it ourselves, and weren't allowed to go home until we had given evidence that we could remember at least the first four lines of the second stanza, which runs like this. 

I love a sunburnt country,
A land of sweeping plains,
Of ragged mountain ranges,
Of droughts and flooding rains.
I love her far horizons,
I love her jewel-sea,
Her beauty and her terror —
The wide brown land for me.

The first four lines of the stanza are the bit that everybody knows, partly because they are so addictively crafted, and partly because they fit the national experience of what Australia's geography and climate are actually like. In any household, the seniors (known in Australia as "the wrinklies") remember the droughts and the flooding rains of their childhood. I myself remember the Maitland floods of the early 1950s. The whole of the central seaboard of New South Wales was under water. I can remember rain you couldn't see through: right there in my southern suburb of Sydney, the creek flooded the park, and the lake in the park spilled into the bottom of our street, prompting the construction of a galvanised iron canoe in which three of us sailed to what would have been certain death if the contraption had floated for more than a few seconds.  

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Catherine van Wilgenburg
March 11th, 2011
11:03 AM
Dear Clive, As a Pommie migrant 40 years ago, not unlike yourself having taken the opposite journey from Oz, I am fascinated that you still consider yourself an Ozzie and write with such conviction that you are a real patriotic Australian. Come on Clive get real - you're a European now! I just can't imagine you singing 'Come on Aussie Come On' at a Grosvenor or Knightsbridge dinner party or oops barbeque! There are several points in this article Clive that bare your arse! 1. That you and your mates'(who are no longer your mates because you don't know them any more) experience of the Maitland floods and droughts of the 1950s is the same as other wrinklies. 2. You never mention what Aboriginal experience of weather patterns of the last 50/60 years has been, even though you comment on how early settlers finding out from Aboriginals might have been useful. 3.And Clive - there's plenty of Aboriginal wrinklies still living! 4.You don't mention Oz as part of Asia and the Pacific and their experience of what's been going on around here - You're an isolationist Clive! 4.And Clive doesn't science have anything to offer us in terms of statistics and data? 5. Or is your and your ex mates' memories the only gauge we need by which to make decisions about the building of dams or renewable energy, or coal-fired power stations or nuclear fuel or protecting and maintaining habitats for fauna and flora which maintain eco-systems. 6. Clive come on Down Under! Meet the real people with vision, who care about all the facts AND anecdotal evidence from individuals and communities around Australia; who are taking responsibility for maintaining the possible freedoms in your backyard in Maitland which have contributed to who you are today. 7 We love you Clive, you're gorgeous and funny and witty and make us stare at our reflections in your writings. 8. Clive come on home to us little people, to us little poor migrants first, second, third fourth, fifth generations, to the first settler convict stock and to the Aboriginal Australians, along with all indigenous peoples who have always known that Climate Change is a Land Management Issue, not a matter of ideology, Green Red Pink or Blue 9 Listen! Listen! Listen! Clive to the people who in your article you state were ignored by the European settlers. Clive just come and meet the thousands in Landcare groups, Friends' Environment Groups, the corporate social responsibility programs, church groups.... it's all a happening thing Clive - don't get trapped in the past! I'll show you a good time Clive, come on downunder and see what's really going on! We little people are not duped by academics and politicians, we're out there doing what we know for ourselves! We'll ALL show you a good time Clive!

Toby Heale
March 10th, 2011
9:03 PM
I wrote that climate change was cyclical in 2003. The Social Affairs Unit published my book Corruption-Absolutely! in 2009 which contained this view. The seat of this corruption is the United Nations. go to www.savethefreesociety.org Click on Articles and listen to Global Warming is Cyclical. Listen also to : Politics is not a Straight line. That should alert your interest!

Jack
March 10th, 2011
5:03 PM
The cawing of the warmist crows nearly always includes the notion that anyone who disagrees with their doomsday view is paid by "BIG OIL". Gasp! Shock! Horror! Meanwhile back in some other nest, these crows have kicked out sense and reason and substituted a consensus computer egg for the rest of the world to hatch. The trouble is the doomsday egg keeps butting its mathematical head against the pitiless blue sky. It can't even get in out of the rain because its programming tells it is both Arthur and Martha.

reformedwarmist
March 10th, 2011
12:03 PM
Three cheers for Clive James for having the ticker to stand-up to the "Armageddon-mafia". By the way, if anyone tries to say you're a scientific lightweight, please refer them to the Indian Scientist Dr Rao. This gent, on 21/1/11, released a scientific paper which undermines the IPCC's alleged 'man-made' effects on global warming by in excess of 40%! "The cause is reduced impact of Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) on formulation of low clouds over earth in the last 150 years. .. The GCRs are the ones that enter solar system (& our atmosphere) from outside, mostly from exploding stars, and help in forming low level clouds over the earth. The theory is that the solar magnetic field deflects GCRs, thereby impacting low-level cloud formation" (Source, Hindustan Times.) (It would be great if the warmists could come up with some more recent scientific material than circa 2009!!!)

Frank D'Farmer
March 10th, 2011
7:03 AM
Thank god someone like Clive is talking commonsense in the media. Well done Clive , keep it up. Stop this madness by people who want more control over us and more money out of us. Australians should stand up and make some noise against these dangerous Green ideologies. People who live and rely on the land have their own records that tell the tale of the seasonal variability of our climate. It always changes, and it is unpredictable. When the warmists claim the annual temps rising and are the hottest on record, I would like to ask which records are they looking at, and are they cherry picking data to suit their agendas??? It is not warming out in the country areas. It seems to be warming only in the densely populated urban areas due to increasing population density (concrete jungles). Also watch this animation of weather stations rise and decline. Dude, where is my thermometer? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58mDaK9bH5o&feature=player_embedded

Peter Andrew
March 10th, 2011
6:03 AM
See this link to review of Flannery book by wise Crispin Tickell: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d570d696-45e3-11e0-acd8-00144feab49a.html#axzz...

John
March 10th, 2011
5:03 AM
The poet was precocious, because she had only a few years to learn how the climate makes people different in Australia and Europe. I came to Australia in 1980 and it took many years to understand how a drought makes people 'sick at heart'. At first I thought it was a difference between the peoples of Europe and Australia. Gradually I saw it was the climate. Winter is a blessing compared to years of drought. How many flood years did she see? How many drought years? She learned quickly. When I first came the poem seemed shalow but now I have seen a long drought followed by a big flood year I can see that the poem is genuinely moving.

Dallas Beaufort
March 10th, 2011
4:03 AM
And no mention of the Weatherman Inigo Jones (RIP) yet.

Rob Davidson
March 9th, 2011
9:03 PM
Stop using that dumb label "warmist" for people who just accept the overwhelming evidence. You're in denial, sorry, it's obvious.

Garry Wyndham
March 9th, 2011
7:03 PM
I loved this article particularly the phrase 'the theory, in its Climate Change form, was readily applicable to any circumstances.' I don't think anybody seriously denies 'climate change' - it would be like denying 'tidal change' or 'weather change'. Nor, I think, does anybody seriously deny the possibility that human activities might be contributing to 'climate change'. What we're debating is the magnitude. Are our activities causing an impact of, say, 10%? Or is it 1%? Or is it, say, 0.00001%?

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.