You are here:   Dispatches > Turks, Arabs and Jews: The Middle East in Crisis
 

Meanwhile, Europe is in for a cold winter of economic discontent, while America is rapidly disengaging. With the most volatile region of the world on the brink of chaos, the only remaining superpower is absorbed in a petty sexual scandal and negotiations over taxes. It is the worst moment in modern history for such an eclipse of Western power. Nothing in the Middle East is solid or permanent. Even Constantinople's walls eventually gave way.

Seen from Jerusalem, this landscape is both alarming and reassuring. Under missile attack, Israel has not lost its composure. There have not been widespread scenes of panic. Life is continuing. Like a sturdy ship weathering a mighty storm, Israel appears undaunted. The ship will not stay dry in such a storm, but it will not sink either. 

This is not the last round, pace the peacemakers, whose optimism can sometimes be dangerously naive. But it is the round that will set the tone for future dynamics. Gone are the days when Palestinian-Israeli tensions were negotiated by Israel, the Palestinian Authority (PA), Jordan and Egypt, under American tutelage. American leverage is diminished. Jordan is almost gone and has been left out entirely from negotiations. The PA is sidelined, because of its leaders' obtuseness and the rise of Islamic forces that are more comfortable working with Hamas.

Istanbul's walls, which the Romans built and the Ottomans took over, suddenly look more fragile in the face of the coming storm than Jerusalem's walls, which the Romans destroyed and the Ottomans rebuilt.

It took General Allenby and a Western army to take Jerusalem. It will take a full restoration of American power to shield the region from its worst instincts. And at this point, it looks unlikely that America will volunteer for the task.

 

 

 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
geoff garside
January 5th, 2013
8:01 PM
This is a very long-winded article that doesn't say very much save that Erdogan has reoriented Turkey's position in the world. But we know that. The discussion of nationalism is superficial. The whole poinjt about Erdogan is that he is an opportunist, who stands somewhere between Kemalism and the Turkic (not Turkish) nationalism that now has a place in the AKP ranks (Tv shows about Bosnia, Kosovo, Turkmenistan, the Caucuses etc, folk dance festivals celebrating Turkich culture). There are also concrete examples of Erdogan's playing off different countries against one another or just being unpredicatble - so he is hostile to Israel but perfectly open armed towards american business, especially agribusiness, which is now destroying turkey's agricultural sector and swelling already bloated cities like Istanbul. And what about his 'at least 3 children' family policy?

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics