You are here:   Dispatches > Paris: Prisoner of the Barbarians
 

Fofana had sent Yalda and another girl to lure Jewish victims in cell phone shops near the Place de la République. Jews had money, he told Yalda, and they stuck together. If the family can't pay the ransom, the community will pitch in. Jews, he told her, lived like kings in France while we lived in misery.
After the crime was uncovered, commentators gave an economic narrative that would hide the truth of murderous Jew-hatred flourishing in a Parisian banlieue. It wasn't really anti-Semitism, they claimed. It was simply that Fofana thought Jews were rich. The police, too, stubbornly clung to the kidnap-for-ransom scenario. What did they make of the photo the Barbarians sent the family the day after Ilan disappeared? The photo was reproduced on the cover of Choc magazine on 18 May. Withdrawn by a court order, it still circulates on the internet. Ilan's face is completely covered with thick silver duct tape except for his broken, bleeding nose. His hands are bound with the same tape. A newspaper is propped against his chest and he is holding his car keys. ("Key" was the code word Yalda used to signal to the thugs waiting for Ilan behind the bushes.) A black-sleeved hand holds a gun to Ilan's head. Does that look like a kidnapping for ransom? Ilan's eyes and mouth are taped shut. Doesn't that indicate exceptional cruelty and clumsy incompetence? Exaggerated, erratic ransom demands ranged from  ¤5,000 to ¤450,000 (£4,250-£380,000). Drop-off appointments were made and cancelled. Koranic verses were read against the background of Ilan's screams. 

Although Ilan lived with his mother, the police decided that her ex-husband — and his father — should be the kidnappers' sole contact. He took as many as 50 phone calls in one day, all of them peppered with murderous threats and anti-Semitic insults. And yet the police could never trace them.

Ilan was held in a vacant apartment and then transferred to a basement before workmen came to paint the apartment for the new tenants. The duct tape was never removed from his face, his hands were constantly bound, he was naked under a flimsy robe in the dead of winter. He was fed through a straw. His toilet was a plastic bag. 

Some of the gang members are charged as accessories, others with direct participation in kidnapping, illegal confinement and torture, with the aggravating circumstances of anti-Semitism. They guarded the prisoner, beat him, burned him, cut out chunks of his skin, taunted him, threatened him, deprived him of basic human needs and watched him creep slowly to inexorable death. Twenty-four days, 576 hours, 34,560 minutes of agony. 

On 13 February, having failed to get the ransom money, Fofana stuffed what was left of Ilan into the boot of a stolen car, drove to a field near a railway line in nearby Sainte Geneviève-des-Bois, doused him with flammable liquid, set fire to him and stabbed him in the neck and hip. 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Andrew Bostom
July 3rd, 2009
11:07 AM
Elsewhere in reports on the trial mentioned in the article Fofana is quoted as saying that he is right to hate Jews because it says so in the Koran, and/or he learned from the Koran to hate Jews. Below are links to but a sampling of the motifs of purely Islamic Jew hatred found in the Koran and the hadith, and the ugly acts of anti-Jewish hatred they have engendered across space and time by Muslims, past and present over a continuum of almost 14 centuries. These are—wait for it—facts, as opposed to ignorant, self-righteous and corrosive fantasies. http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/2008/04/020584print.html Antisemitism in the Qur’an: Motifs and Historical Manifestations http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/2008/04/020709print.html Antisemitism in the Hadith and Early Muslim Biographies of Muhammad: Motifs and Manifestations

Matt Juden
June 30th, 2009
4:06 PM
I didn't intend to implicitly deny what you've pointed out Raymond. It is nevertheless unproductive to ever call Jew-hatred in general or in a specific case 'Islamic' as this denies the legitimacy and profusion of expressions of Islam which do not involve such hatred. I remain open to the author of the piece defending their wording, of course.

Raymond in DC
June 29th, 2009
10:06 AM
While the author may have been inconsistent in choice of adjectives, his intent should have been clear. Matt Juden may be uncomfortable with the implications, but Andrew G Bostom's "The Legacy of Islamic AntiSemitism" shows that such events have a long history, indeed, going back to the very founding of this movement. It was, after all, during Mohammed's time that the targeting of Jews - and thus their despoliation, murder and exile from Arabia - was given theological foundation. The Koran itself is rife with Jew hatred, as it is of all "unbelievers" (infidels), but the particular animus toward the Jew is undeniable.

Laura
June 29th, 2009
12:06 AM
How could there be doubt that the police intended to fail to rescue Ilan? Multiple phone calls that weren't traced? Screams heard over the phone? Taunts by the torturers? Failure to understand the anti-semitic insanity that drives the murderers? How can a reader evade the conclusion that that the police either intentionally connived with the crime, or else are so incompetent and blase about the nature of Ilan's abductors as to amount to the same thing?

Matt Juden
June 28th, 2009
11:06 PM
'Islamic Jew-hatred' from the second paragraph contains an ill-chosen adjective. The writing in the next paragraph follows a useful convention when it mentions 'Islamist anti-Semitism'. It is, surely, essential to distinguish between sentiments which are 'Islamic' and those which are 'Islamist'. This makes it clear that the author is not talking about all expressions of Islam, just those which are Islamist. Probably, the author does not mean to suggest that the Jew-hatred in question is even 'Islamist' let alone 'Islamic', but rather that the Jew-hatred was part of Fofana's brand of Islam. 'Jew-hatred' and a supplementary sentence or 'Jew-hatred, part of his radical Islamism' would both be better. Whatever the author meant, it seems to me that a more precise expression was very necessary unless the author wished to suggested that it is reasonable to consider Jew-hatred Islamic. Is the adjective used in paragraph two an error, or do I mistunderstand and the author intended to signify that the Jew-hatred in question or Jew-hatred in general should be considered Islamic?

Bill Corr
June 28th, 2009
4:06 AM
Simple piggy indolence and incompetence and a quite understandable reluctance to tangle with the "youths" known to be willing to fire on the police with hunting rifles. THE SOLUTION: A minister of justice with guts, balls and backbone. C'est tous, mes amis!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics