You are here:   Dispatches > Strangers in their own Holy Land
 
"They are demanding money only from the Christians. No Christian can open a shop on the main road without being required to pay," says one shopkeeper, nervously looking out of his window to check for eavesdroppers.

The price for not paying is made clear. One owner who had refused to pay had his shop peppered with bullets. Another's shopfront was set on fire. The crimes, the locals explain, are perpetrated by gangs "without religion" and started several years ago. Those affected remain too scared to seek help from the police, who they say have neglected the city.

Leon Barra describes how he was "chased, knifed and threatened" by "fundamentalists" who, he says, tried to kill him several years ago. "No one protected me — not until the same gang killed a Jewish taxi driver. Only then did the police put them in jail." He says no one is immune from the criminals, but the Christians constitute the majority of those targeted: "Christians are always the weaker party here, due to our smaller families."

Elsewhere in Israel, action is being taken over a spate of hate crimes directed at both Christians and Muslims. Jerusalem, along with other cities in Israel and the West Bank, has seen a spike in so-called "price tag attacks". Graffiti on houses, churches and mosques, vandalism and arson are just some of the actions taken by Jewish extremists in recent years. The trend was begun in the West Bank in 2009 by radical settlers angry at measures intended to curb settlement growth. Since then the movement has spilled over into Israel. In recent months, the Israeli police have cracked down on the perpetrators, establishing a special price tag unit and even using drone technology to capture the criminals.

But in Nazareth intimidation is still rife. "The residents are afraid to go to the police, because if they do, the next day their houses and car will be attacked," says Father Nadaf, a local Greek Orthodox priest, noting that there is increasing violence among Israeli Arabs generally.

Father Nadaf is no ordinary priest. For one thing, there is a "wanted" poster with his photograph and a hefty price on his head circulating on the internet.

The reason for this is that many object to Nadaf's stance on integration within Israeli society. Because the majority of Israel's Christians are Arabs, they are exempt from military service. But Nadaf and others say that this is not the way forward. He advocates what he calls "full engagement with the Jewish community".

Full engagement means serving in the Israeli Defence Forces, which is compulsory for male and female Jewish Israelis (except for the majority of the ultra-Orthodox until now).

"Israeli Christians are a minority," says Nadaf. "There is a good and stable relationship between Jews and Christians in Israel. It's a cause of great pride." But in Syria, Egypt, Iraq and elsewhere, Christians are being persecuted, he says. 

In March, Nadaf led a 150-strong demonstration of Christian Arabs outside the European Union mission in Tel Aviv. "According to the statistics, a Christian is murdered every five minutes in the Middle East, and the Western world is silent about this," he said to his fellow demonstrators.

Today Nadaf encourages other Christians in Israel to realign with the Jewish majority instead. In 2012, he became head of the Israeli Christian Recruitment Forum, a joint government-community group founded by members of the clergy and prominent Israeli Christians already serving in the IDF, police and border police, with the aim of encouraging Christian youth to enlist.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Getovah Yusef
August 14th, 2014
1:08 AM
Every such description is similarly limited, 'European' for example. That doesnt mean it doesnt have perfectly sufficient validity for the purpose to which it is being put does it?! Notwithstanding heterogeneity within the Arab world there is also a significant amount of shared culture which the word 'Arab' signifies such peoples as sharing. Therefore if you dont want to use the word 'Arab' then youre going to just have to replace it with a new word arent you! Just because it is possible to misuse 'Arab' to mean something more than it can legitimately mean, doesnt mean that all uses are therefore mistaken or 'contentious'. If you think that this article misuses the word then didnt it occur to you to mention where and in what way? 'Arab' doesnt 'technically' mean someone who is from the Arabian peninsula or who is Bedouin, it can perfectly technically mean someone who is a member of the pan-ethnic group 'Arab'. How about Nasser, was he a Western imperialist?

Abulhaq
July 16th, 2014
5:07 PM
The denomination Arab is highly contentious. Its use is western imperialist in origin and retains pejorative overtones. Few Arabic speakers use or even like the term. Technically an "Arab" comes from the Arabian peninsula or is Bedouin. Maronites, for example, are arabized Aramaeans and not ethnically Arab. In Egypt many dismiss the Arab label as ahistorical and inaccurate. The further west one goes calling people Arab becomes even more inappropriate as it can signify an ethnic supremacy. Arab as a signifier of bland homogeneity, forced Islamization and Arabization should be challenged. Father Nadaf is a brave man indeed but many in the so-called Dar-al-Islam share his worldview and risk their lives accordingly.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics