You are here:   Davies Giddy > At Last: Gove Goes For the Culture of Excuses
 

Central to this success is the KIPP network's core "operating principle" of high expectations. "KIPP schools have clearly defined and measurable high expectations for academic achievement and conduct that makes no excuses based on the students' backgrounds." There is no secret as to how such expectations are upheld. They are achieved through "a range of formal and informal rewards and consequences for academic performance and behaviour".

The same thinking has been expressed by the current head of Ofsted, Sir Michael Wilshaw. His achievements as headmaster of Mossbourne Academy in East London are now the stuff of legend, but bear repetition. The school had the same proportion of pupils on free school meals as the one where I teach, but 89 per cent of them obtain five A*-C grades at GCSE, including English and maths. This is not achieved through a cynical focus on the C grade borderline, as Mossbourne also cultivates high achievers. Last year, 63 per cent of its pupils gained an A*-A grade in English literature GCSE, and 52 per cent of its A-level grades were A*-B. This places it in the top 1 per cent of schools nationwide, an astonishing achievement. Wilshaw said: "There are a growing number of schools producing fantastic results in areas of deprivation. We've got to stop making excuses for background, culture and ethnicity and get on with it." 

A key part of such advances is adopting strict rules and punishments. "We teach the children the difference between right and wrong, good and evil," said Wilshaw. "They know that if they disrupt class or are rude to teachers, there will be consequences." Sadly, this is not a particularly fashionable way to run a school within Britain's state sector, and many of Wilshaw's detractors criticise the "prison camp" ethos of his old school. Apologists for contemporary British education tend to prefer a more child-centred, progressive outlook where pupils comply through choice, not coercion. 

Such a philosophy forms a convenient alliance with the sociological view. I have lost count of the number of times the terrible behaviour at our school has been blamed on the social background of the pupils, instead of the school's unwillingness to implement a functioning behaviour policy. The sociological view is also used to discount the importance of the different methods employed in rapidly improving schools. In her book School Wars, Melissa Benn implies that the real root of Mossbourne's success is not its traditionalist outlook, but instead a change in the catchment area's social makeup. She points out that the predecessor school had 77 per cent of pupils on free school meals, nearly double the current number. So there are sociological excuses for success as well as failure.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Malcolm McLean
April 7th, 2013
9:04 PM
The main finding of decades of educational research is that a school's results are affected by its intake. Individual heads can achieve great things with failing schools. However their techniques are too dependent on personality,and they're not easy to replicate. Just naively ramping up discipline by fussing a lot about uniform, for example, often won't achieve the desired objective. But whilst the answer isn't as easy as the article suggests, the diagnosis strikes me as right. There are too many excuses, too many easy options, too much writing off of high standards as impossible.

Anonymous
April 5th, 2013
9:04 AM
The 440 schools that have higher than average A*-C for FSM are quite clearly NOT the example of "taught well in a good school" that you are looking for. We have one of them as our local school, and I can say that it is the most cynical exponent of throwing all effort at the C/D border that you could possibly ever see. They also have an exceptionally low rate of higher ability pupils making expected progress. It can be very misleading to look at one measure without having the full picture.

Mike
April 3rd, 2013
1:04 AM
Deptford Green School has had £32M spent upon it yet is in special measures. http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/lewisham/10308262.__32m_Deptford_Green...

Anonymous
March 28th, 2013
8:03 PM
There are also terrible schools in wonderful buildings.

Anonymous
March 28th, 2013
6:03 PM
Same old anecdotal tittle-tattle without any objective data.

Anonymous
March 27th, 2013
12:03 PM
The Mossbourne example is misleading: the 6th form has it's own entry system, meaning progression from lower school is not automatic: many students come in from outside, many don't make it up from year 11. This renders the college's high achievement at A-Level an inadequate tool with which to interpret strategy at GCSE level, the purpose for which Mr Hunter uses it here. Mossbourne has also had a great deal of advantages not open to other schools in similar positions, most notably a Richard Rogers-designed, £25m building that makes its status as THE go-to exemplar of educational success in deprived areas sit rather uneasily in the face of (amongst other things) the cancellation of the 'Building Schools For The Future' programe, which affected 715 schools. I agree with the author that every effort should be made to overcome poverty as an educational determinant - but I'm just a little fed up of Mossbourne being held up as a utopian paradigm replicable with nothing more than a bit of resolve and elbow grease. I'm not sure Matthew Hunter goes quite that far, to be fair - but he's not a million miles away.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.