You are here:   Davies Giddy > At Last: Gove Goes For the Culture of Excuses
 

In order to fulfil its professional responsibility, a school must strenuously resist taking on the sociological view. This is difficult when education departments in British universities turn out acres of paper every year reinforcing the message that socioeconomic background dictates success. What they show is undeniable: in the broad averages of large-scale longitudinal studies, social background does correlate with educational outcome. But schools deal with individuals, not averages. It is a school's responsibility to do all it can to iron out such differences and never treat them as a foregone conclusion. Recent research suggests that there are more than 440 secondary schools where the average GCSE score for children on free school meals is above the national average. Taught well in a good school, poor pupils can succeed. 

It is a paradox that idealistic educators in favour of social justice are seduced by the sociological view into accepting their own inability to achieve it. In today's Britain, schools which use social background as an excuse for the underachievement of their pupils are the cause of a far greater deprivation than the social background itself.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Malcolm McLean
April 7th, 2013
9:04 PM
The main finding of decades of educational research is that a school's results are affected by its intake. Individual heads can achieve great things with failing schools. However their techniques are too dependent on personality,and they're not easy to replicate. Just naively ramping up discipline by fussing a lot about uniform, for example, often won't achieve the desired objective. But whilst the answer isn't as easy as the article suggests, the diagnosis strikes me as right. There are too many excuses, too many easy options, too much writing off of high standards as impossible.

Anonymous
April 5th, 2013
9:04 AM
The 440 schools that have higher than average A*-C for FSM are quite clearly NOT the example of "taught well in a good school" that you are looking for. We have one of them as our local school, and I can say that it is the most cynical exponent of throwing all effort at the C/D border that you could possibly ever see. They also have an exceptionally low rate of higher ability pupils making expected progress. It can be very misleading to look at one measure without having the full picture.

Mike
April 3rd, 2013
1:04 AM
Deptford Green School has had £32M spent upon it yet is in special measures. http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/lewisham/10308262.__32m_Deptford_Green...

Anonymous
March 28th, 2013
8:03 PM
There are also terrible schools in wonderful buildings.

Anonymous
March 28th, 2013
6:03 PM
Same old anecdotal tittle-tattle without any objective data.

Anonymous
March 27th, 2013
12:03 PM
The Mossbourne example is misleading: the 6th form has it's own entry system, meaning progression from lower school is not automatic: many students come in from outside, many don't make it up from year 11. This renders the college's high achievement at A-Level an inadequate tool with which to interpret strategy at GCSE level, the purpose for which Mr Hunter uses it here. Mossbourne has also had a great deal of advantages not open to other schools in similar positions, most notably a Richard Rogers-designed, £25m building that makes its status as THE go-to exemplar of educational success in deprived areas sit rather uneasily in the face of (amongst other things) the cancellation of the 'Building Schools For The Future' programe, which affected 715 schools. I agree with the author that every effort should be made to overcome poverty as an educational determinant - but I'm just a little fed up of Mossbourne being held up as a utopian paradigm replicable with nothing more than a bit of resolve and elbow grease. I'm not sure Matthew Hunter goes quite that far, to be fair - but he's not a million miles away.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.