You are here:   Art > Off-Limits: Subjects Artists Won't Tackle
 
  

It is indeed the increasing presence of Islam, and a fear of Islamism, which more than anything else has exposed the claims of the arts apologists to be seriously at the forefront of anything. My colleague Nick Cohen pointed out, when we debated freedom of expression at a recent Standpoint Salon, that some individuals in our media are prone to a fake courage and believe themselves to be taking huge risks in what they say and write. I think the same is true of the creative sphere. Over the past decade  people in the arts have caved in and censored themselves at the prospect of Islamist reaction, sometimes out of fear of violence, other times a politically correct desire not to give offence, or because in some skewed way they feel their job is to stand up for those their dogma tells them are "victims".

When the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh was murdered in broad daylight on an Amsterdam street by a Muslim extremist who had taken exception to Submission, a film the director had made about the treatment of women in Islam, there were few expressions of outrage from Britain's cultural establishment. On another occasion, London's Barbican Centre removed pieces from its production of Tamburlaine the Great for fear of offending Muslims. The filming of Monica Ali's bestseller Brick Lane was moved from the East End after the film company gave in to protests from activists. A reading at the Royal Court Theatre of an adaptation of Aristophanes "sex strike" play Lysistrata, set in Muslim heaven, did not go ahead. And when the BBC drama Spooks was criticised by some Muslim groups in its first series for portraying radicalisation in a mosque, it subsequently went out of its way to ensure that plotlines portrayed threats coming from just about any quarter other than Islam.

The drip-drip effect of such trimming and censorship is that the message becomes internalised. If such instances as those above appear to happen slightly less now, it is not because we have become more comfortable in our own skins, less paranoid. It is simply because we have learned what we can and cannot say, especially when it comes to Islam. Christianity of course remains the fair game it has always been. Jerry Springer: The Opera was oh-so-bravely broadcast by the BBC, in the face of thousands of telephone complaints from Christians. It could of course be done in the safe knowledge that nobody might face death as a result. But we can safely say that a country that produced the popular classic The Life of Brian must get used to the fact that it will never, ever see The Life of Iqbal.

Having set the ball rolling by asking whether art has lost its power to shock, Grayson Perry should perhaps get the last word. In 2007 he declared in a statement which some admired for its honesty but others might have seen as depressing evidence of how meek our arts had become, that when it came to his own work, he had "not gone all out attacking Islamism because I feel the real fear that someone will slit my throat". To which perhaps one can only answer: artist, heal thyself.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
February 16th, 2014
6:02 PM
It's not that there are not shocking subjects. There always will be. It is that these subjects are not well displayed in art anymore. We have witnessed the death of the Avant-Garde.

Mark Piggott
December 10th, 2013
1:12 PM
"try to think of a novel, play, film or piece of installation art which, for example, seriously criticises the doctrine of multiculturalism." My novel "Out of Office" did that in 2010 - good publisher, won novel of month at one influential website - not a single review in mainstream media...

hegel`s advocate
December 4th, 2013
4:12 PM
So Malaise69 thinks Islam is a dead horse? A dead horse that doesn`t attack and Kill ? What`s he tying to say ? Not a single sentence is coherent. What`s on his bookshelf or wall? Anything worth mentioning besides the two films in his dvd collection ?

Wilfred Ruffian
December 4th, 2013
4:12 PM
The tone of this article suggests that artists are cowards. I find this objectionable. All the artists I know are firmly committed to speaking truth to any power that will not hurt or arrest them.

Malaise69
December 3rd, 2013
7:12 AM
We already attack other cultures and Islam outright with phsyical and structural violence. Art joining in to beat a dead horse surely would be shocking... just like getting your leg run over by a truck would surely be "sensational". Are we so numb that any pin prick of feeling is 'Art' no matter the cost? Jeeze if you really want to see at work of 'Art' that is 'critical' of 'multiculturalism' watch A Birth Of A Nation or Triumph of The Will. Until then please keep your contrived attempt at contrarianism to yourself, at least until you get over that impluse to consider conserving the status quo as 'radical'. *sigh*

hegel`s advocate
November 28th, 2013
9:11 PM
True but why do you guys ignore Pussy Riot art and Femen art ? Zizek doesn`t.Nor the other 15 philosophers who signed the letter published in the Guardian. Nor does the Feminist Times ignore them. Julie Burchill has "tackled" Islamism. As I mentioned in the comments after the `...losing the war for the soul of Islam` article, situationist Mustapha Kyati`s " Burn Your Own Koran" tackles it well. It would be very easy for Nick Cohen and Peter Whittle to make paintings of it.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.