You are here:   Education > An Open Letter To Nicky Morgan
 
We don’t expect lesson plans from teachers and we don’t grade their lessons either. We trust our teachers to be professionals. Of course there is a system of accountability if teachers were to disappoint. Just because we trust and respect our teachers does not mean our systems are lacking in rigour. Steve Jobs once said that one should not hire clever people and set them targets. One should hire clever people and get them to tell you what to do. This is exactly what we do at Michaela.

We keep bureaucracy to an absolute minimum. This has a hugely beneficial impact on staff morale and performance. We have 100 per cent of our teachers staying on next year. And 100 per cent of our teachers have 100 per cent attendance at school. This provides the children with continuity and consistency and we exemplify the behaviour we expect from them. I often have conversations with families who are not good at getting their children into school every day. I say, the staff are always here and your children should be too. Our staff are always at school because they love being there, thanks to the ethos and environment we have created. I trust them and they trust me.

We centralise detentions and homework so that teachers don’t have to chase pupils. Our bespoke IT system to record bad behaviour has been created with minimal writing required from teachers. Homework is either self-marked or peer-marked: less paperwork for the teacher.

As headmistress, I am simply unwilling to bury staff in paperwork. But keeping bureaucracy at bay exposes the school to the risk of being slammed by Ofsted for doing just that. The problem with Ofsted inspectors is that they often believe their own rhetoric: boxes are all-important. How do I know this? Because all schools hire inspectors who double up as consultants to advise schools on how to play the game with their colleagues. It really is just a game, Ms Morgan. Many give schools scripts on what to say and how to argue with an inspector to raise the grade given by the inspector. The emperor really isn’t wearing any clothes. Please can we all stop saying that he is?

Although Michael Gove believed he had fixed things by not requiring self-evaluation plans from schools, inspectors are quick to point out that if a school doesn’t have one it immediately sets alarm bells ringing in their heads. But it simply isn’t the case, as one inspector told me, that one cannot evaluate one’s school on one’s own terms. He was absolutely convinced that one must always use the Ofsted handbook and apply it to the school. For him, that is simply what self-evaluation is.

I wonder what handbook Steve Jobs used to evaluate Apple?

After arguing at great length the other day with an Ofsted inspector on the value of written justifications, I asked him for the main thing he would change if he could go back to being a head. He had been head of two different schools before becoming an Ofsted inspector. He smiled and said that he would write a lot less down.

If we want innovation and creativity in our schools, we need to throw away the rulebook, get rid of Ofsted, and get rid of the pernicious, target-driven culture in our education system. Give heads the freedom required to run their schools the way they know works. Give families the freedom to choose the school that they want, meaning you need to abolish catchment areas, and prevent the middle class from rigging the system to work for them.

So much of the system is upside down. Please, Ms Morgan, be part of the struggle to turn it right-side up.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
marklu
August 20th, 2015
9:08 PM
Sensible on OFSTED and PRP, if only you had not pandered to the bleariness brigade 5 years ago with oh so witty quip about being inclined to join the SWP before becoming a teacher. Still it got you your school eventually. Michaela has been running with year 7 only, I can name at least one band new academy that got off to a roaring start and now is in special measures. Do be careful about telling everyone about how great you are, you were at it on Channel 4 news the other night too.

Charlie7
July 29th, 2015
12:07 AM
Factors which are ignored. 1. Some parents are indifferent or even antagonistic to education and this attitude is absorbed by their children. 2. Standards of academic performance are subjective because of the massive variation in the academic ability of teachers are variable , some teachers struggle to obtain 2 A levels in order to obtain a B.Ed from an ex-poly while others may obtain a starred first from Oxbridge or Imperial and represent their country at sports while at university. 3. The range of academic ability of children is vast. The problem is that most state schools do not appreciate how bright some pupils actually are. How many pupils at comprehensives could win an Election to Winchester, a King's Scholarship to Eton or a Queen's Scholarship to Westminster? A friend at a prep school by the age of 11 was studying French, Latin, Greek and Sanskrit.If most pupils in the scholarship stream of prep schools are studying French, Latin and Greek by the age of 10, why cannot pupils in primary schools be offered the same high level of scholarship? In manufacturing in order to achieve the best, one has to bench mark against the best not against the average. In order to reduce social inequality,state primary schools must equal the best prep schools such as Pilgrim's http://www.thepilgrims-school.co.uk/Senior-Schools 4. The massive decline in academic standards which occurred in some primary and comprehensives schools and teacher training establishments in the 1960s-1980s is still being ignored; read article in Standpoint on Islington Schools /node/5519/full 5. Until state schools bench mark themselves against prep schools such as Pilgrims and public schools such as Winchester,Eton or Westminster , inequality will exist.As A Sampson stated in his Anatomy Books ( especially 1965and 1982), the Direct Grant Grammar Schools in the late 50s and early 60s outperformed most public schools and Manchester GS competed with Winchester for entries to Oxbridge.

David Palmer
July 17th, 2015
2:07 PM
Dear Katherine, I have taught for over 20 years and long ago reached the same conclusions. I agree with everything in the education model you have developed but the key problem to solve accountability (as you allude to) and replacing centralised 'coordinating mechanisms' with decentralised mechanisms. For what it is worth here are my thoughts... There are strong analogies between reform of the centralised OFSTED-regulated and target-driven bureaucratic system of UK state education and reform of the Soviet central planning system. Reforming it faces similar problems to Soviet perestroika. Partially reformingstate education (academies) and giving enterprise managers (heads) autonomy leaves these heads greater freedom to pursue self-interest without necessarily improving enterprise outcomes - similar to early 'perestroika'. It is likely to result in limited gains (if any, and more gaming the system by bureaucratic insiders. However trying radical reform from above - as in late perestroika - which removes the power of the central coordinating mechanism (OFSTED) in a non-transparent bureaucratic system is likely to lead collapse and chaos. Probably only a parallel system allowing 'reform from below' with new free school models like yours can work. However replacing bureaucracy with market competition as the main regulator is rife with dangers - as you intimate. More competition is likely to lead to greater divergence, not convergence in school performance and an increase in social inequality (due to property values). This is the key problem to solve. Keep up the excellent work.

John Wootton
July 11th, 2015
9:07 AM
Hello ... There is an inspector who writes a lot on Twitter ... I said to him that Ofsted should be abolished and it would be better if he and his team went into schools and supported teachers in the classrooms by working alongside them ... Sharing their expertise for a couple of days ... His response was merely to say that schools needed accountability ... I really liked your article due to the fact that your actions seem to reflect your philosophy. I'm not sure the recipient will take much notice of your letter though... Thanks, John.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.