You are here:   Climate change > Ditch Ed Miliband's Crazy Energy Legacy
 
These priorities are incompatible, though our leaders have proved themselves adept at fudging the issues. You cannot continue to subsidise nuclear and renewables, plus the back-up conventional capacity needed to support them, while keeping prices low — especially when conventional energy prices are low and going lower. As for getting a deal in Paris at the next UN climate change conference in November: it is unlikely that the really large carbon producers, China and India, will commit themselves to restrictions that would level the playing field for our already-hamstrung industries.

If Parliament repealed the Climate Change Act, followed, one hopes, by the Energy Act, the British economy would be freed from a straitjacket that dooms it to paying ever-higher prices. Cured — cold turkey — from their addiction to subsidy, power generators would be free to make rational commercial decisions — which in a competitive market would mean a tendency to drive prices down. Renewable power technologies would be forced to compete properly. The hyper-expensive ones would have to go back to the drawing board, but the cheaper technologies would have an incentive to get their costs down to realistic levels. This is already happening with solar, due mainly to the huge Chinese investment in producing photovoltaic panels. It could happen with wind, though not for a few years. The point is that the progression to a lower-carbon future would not be at the cost of our economy, and it would happen organically and not on the artificial timetable dictated by the CCA and its high priests at the CCC.

This, of course, is unlikely to happen quickly, or even at all. It would take a political reaction as powerful as the terrific green concert party that led us to the CCA 2008 and the world into the interminable global climate negotiations. At present the British public is split, though it is fair to say that the majority accept the reality of man-made global warming and the need to do something about it. However, the minority is a substantial one, and numbers are growing. Their position is similar to that of the Eurosceptics a few years ago: numerous, disgruntled and ignored by the political establishment.

In Britain, the worm may just turn with the launch of shale fracking later this year. Applications by the specialist exploration company Cuadrilla to drill in Lancashire are expected to be approved soon, and the first results should be in by December. The Bowland shale is twice the thickness of the largest American shale reserves. Success would change the terms of the game. A new and abundant source of cheap natural gas — not to mention oil — would force the nation to reassess its priorities.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
TheMushyPea
August 21st, 2015
10:08 AM
David Cameron and the Conservatives were huge supporters of the CCA, and it would not have happened without them. It is a much respected and copied act around the world. It would be criminally short sighted to abolish it. Offshore wind is already cheaper than nuclear and solar and onshore wind much more so. They are closing in on gas too.. a few years of high subsidies does not undermine the case for renewables.

No Good Boyo
July 23rd, 2015
6:07 PM
So Millie's CCA requirements are legally binding. What if a government failed to meet them? Would the prime minister go to jail?

Twinkle
June 29th, 2015
11:06 AM
The creation of expensive electricity has several downsides. It increases inequality with some having to turn their electricity/gas off as bills are too high to meet. It will increase existing trends for businesses to relocate to parts of the world where energy is cheaper. I so nor believe there has been any government research at EU or UK level into effects on the economy because they want this policy regardless. Electricity is only 10-20% of energy use in most countries so cutting fossil fuel based electricity by 20% is only 2-4% reduction of total fossil fuel consumption. Windmills, solar, tidal - all a 'false hope', say Stanford PhDs http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/21/renewable_energy_simply_wont_wor...

John Dub
June 29th, 2015
9:06 AM
The CCA is very similar to most of current Labour policy - it makes the Islington set feel more self righteous, and it makes the working classes significantly poorer. And you wonder why you just took a beating at the election?

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.