You are here:   Academia > We Must Set Our Universities Free
 

The immediate problem facing the universities is that of top-up fees. When they were introduced in 2004, the bien pensants were loud in their condemnation: applications to university would evaporate and Britain would be reduced to an uneducated Dark Age where only bankers' children could afford to study after the age of 18. In the event, applications have soared. But, with the recently announced government budget cuts, the fees need to rise urgently.

Lord Browne has been asked to advise the government on the issue, and it is understood that both major political parties will accept his recommendations, thus avoiding the horror of 2003 when Tony Blair's advocacy of top-up fees was countered by a Conservative party that maintained that markets were bad things which true Tories would always oppose. Browne will presumably advise raising the top-up fees to at least £5,000 a year, and yet again the bien pensants will cry panic. 

But the private return in terms of salary on a university education exceeds the cost of that education, just as the private return on a mortgage in terms of capital gain exceeds the cost of the mortgage, and people will need no incentive to buy their university education or their house.

Changes, though, will have to be made to the loan system. Rightly, no one needs to pay fees upfront, and students are loaned the costs of their fees, which they have to pay back only after they have started to earn more than £15,000 a year. 

But the current system, by which the government's loans are made at rates of interest so low that it is paying a greater rate of interest to borrow the money in the first place, will have to be reformed: the government can no longer afford to subsidise students further.

British universities today should not complain about the cuts in government budgets but, rather, of the limitations the government imposes on their economic and administrative freedoms. It is the Ivy League, not the nationalised universities of continental Europe, that should be their lodestar. From medieval times the state has been the enemy of the universities-let the universities distance themselves from it.   

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Fabio P.Barbieri
April 1st, 2010
5:04 PM
I started reading this article in a mood to agree - the horrendous treatment of Britain's great universities by successive despicable governments, and the all too obvious fact that at least Oxford and Cambridge don't have to take it and could easily privatize themselves without the government being able to do a thing, made me think I would find common ground. Alas, the author is no historian (or if he is, God help the discipline of history) and his ugly, ideologically driven free marketeer ideology makes his contribution virtually worthless. The whole history of German universities, for instance, goes for nothing - except an ill-informed suggestion that they are "dire" and overcrowded. A person who builds on foundations so shaky is obviously not going to create anything worth doing.

James
March 24th, 2010
8:03 PM
My three degress are from state universities in the U. S., and I could not agree with you more fully. Institutions of higher learning must maintain as much independence as possible from the state, including popular passions generated by the state. Perhaps it is ironic that in the United States by far the largest single threat to academic freedom comes from universities and colleges, themselves, via their corrosive and trust-destroying speech codes, codes that seek to ban unpopular speech and speech that is not politically correct. In the 1960s we had stduent sit-ins that demanded freedom of speech, and such sit-ins are needed now more than ever.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.