You are here:   Designer babies > Yes Sir, that's my 'Gaybe'
 

There is no law to prevent surrogacy in Britain but it is illegal for surrogates to advertise as they do in the US. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, which regulates infertility and IVF clinics in Britain, says that any offer of such treatment using a surrogate mother would be governed by strict guidelines. 

I ask Barrie what gave him and Tony the idea to have babies using surrogacy. "We just wanted a child back then and if we could have, we would have fostered or adopted," says Barrie. "Lesbians have proved for years that kids of same-sex couples can grow up fine, but we still get prejudice. Lots of people think we must be a couple of paedophiles."

To create Saffron and Aspen, both men's sperm was extracted and separated so that Tony would father the male children and Barrie the females. These samples were mixed with the egg donor's eggs to form embryos. Two embryos were implanted into the surrogate resulting in twins.

Four years later, the men decided to have another child and defrosted the last surviving original embryo. This was implanted in a different surrogate resulting in Orlando. But this embryo had originally split from Aspen's, which means that Aspen and Orlando are biological twins despite the age gap and share exactly the same DNA.

With no embryos left, and the original egg donor being considered too old to donate, the couple chose a 25-year-old model as a replacement from the catalogue supplied by the surrogacy service. They decided that this time they did not mind who was the biological father and both gave sperm samples. Two embryos were implanted in the same surrogate they had used to carry Orlando.

After their first set of twins was born, the Drewitt-Barlows successfully challenged the American authorities to become the first gay couple to have both their names on their children's birth certificates.

 "People said to us we should just accept the fact that it is unnatural for two men to have kids, but neither is growing a new liver, so we refused to give up. And why shouldn't we have our own children?" Barrie is clear, however, that having the children and challenging the law was not something they did for gay emancipation, but was a "completely selfish desire to be parents".

To find the egg donors, the couple spent hours looking through catalogues, commenting on their appearances in a way not dissimilar to choosing a new set of curtains.

Did they consider adopting children once the law changed to allow gay men to do so? "It's a bit like giving blood. I won't do it now because it used to be rejected [as a result of the assumption that gay men were more likely to be infected with HIV than heterosexuals]," says Barrie. "I would cut my nose off to spite my face and now that we can adopt I won't do it."

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Rupert DeBare
November 12th, 2010
3:11 PM
"Selfish" is the word here. While I have sympathy for homosexuals, my greater concern is for the child, who should have, as a basic human right, the right to a balanced parental upbringing -i.e. a mother AND a father. The healthy complementarity of masculine and feminine characteristics in the normal family is not some vagary of chance, but the very proof of perfection in evolutionary design, as evidenced by virtually every survey of social statistics. It's time we started putting the child first, and sacrificing our desires for the sake of his interests.

Anonymous
October 22nd, 2010
6:10 AM
I concur with the criticisms raised in the other posts and would like to add that the article would be much better if it focused more generally on the commercialization of childbirth and reduced the LGBT community to just one of many interested parties. What about infertile heterosexual couples? What about the companies and technology that make designer babies both possible and even profitable? The author calls designer babies ethically questionable. However, she's not clear enough about her own ethical position, especially when she writes, "Having a black child in an all white household is entirely different from one with one black parent. Did they not consider this?" What exactly is this great difference they were supposed to consider? Wasn't part of this couple's decision to move beyond race as a defining quality of a family?

Anonymous
October 5th, 2010
6:10 PM
Bindel writes that "While children's homes are full to bursting with abused, neglected and unwanted children, increasing numbers of lesbians and gay men are making their own, often spending huge amounts of money in order to conceive." Why do same-sex couples have any greater ethical imperative to relieve this situation through adoption than any other couple (or single person that uses a donor and/or IVF)? Doesn't this logic require that EVERYONE who wants to have a child adopt one of the unwanted children, including those who would reproduce using their own sperm, eggs, and uterus? The double standard that the author wants to impose, while not the most egregious aspect of her homophobia (that prize might go to the idea that gay men are shallow pursuers of "designer" babies, rather than people who want to both reproduce and parent with the person they love), does demonstrate her inability to bring even basic analytic rigour to her argument.

Anonymous
October 5th, 2010
9:10 AM
Clearly, only a homosexual couple would treat choosing egg donors like selecting a new set of curtains. Julie Bindel's career success is baffling.

Anonymous
September 30th, 2010
11:09 AM
I find your article sneering, devoid of human warmth and homophobic. Where was the talk of the reality of being a parent that every one of these surrogating parents have faced and will face? I find your continued emphasis of the term "Gaybe" insulting and infuriating. It just shows that blogging is a substandard and probably ill supervised form of writing as I doubt you would get away with this diatribe even in the Daily Mail. Yours, a disgruntled former reader.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.