You are here:   Designer babies > Yes Sir, that's my 'Gaybe'
 

But Andrea Woelke, a solicitor at Alternative Family Law, a firm that offers advice to gay and lesbian couples using IVF and surrogacy, says that many of the gay men he advises choose not to adopt. "Often my clients have considered adoption and fostering," says Woelke, "but the process is such an intrusive and long-winded one and if the children come to them aged three or older they can have problems."

Woelke says that he is noticing an increased number of gay men inquiring about surrogacy. "Lots more lesbian and gay couples are wanting children as it becomes increasingly acceptable. If you are choosing an egg donor then it is inevitable that you would start to consider the type of looks and character traits and abilities you would like your child to have. It is a built-in perk."

Class and racial divisions between surrogates, egg donors and the intended parents are stark. Surrogates tend to be working-class and have already had their own children, whereas the egg donor is likely to be a college student from a wealthy background who is considered bright and attractive. They earn more than the surrogates. In the US, the price of embryos is approximately $20,000. 

In 2007, The Fertility Institutes in Los Angeles announced that, due to popular demand, it would be running a programme aimed at providing surrogacy services to gay men. It immediately began to receive numerous inquires from male couples in Britain. The programme is the first specialist surrogacy scheme dedicated to "two-father" families. The men are able to choose whether to have boys or girls, with three-quarters so far opting for male babies. 

I spoke to one surrogate in the US, a 35-year-old housewife who asked not to be named because, she said, her parents would be "horrified" if they knew she made money from giving birth. "I was approached by a gay male couple last year who told me I was perfect for them because I had wide hips, like a brood-mare. I am now seven months pregnant and they come with me to every appointment and talk to my doctors on a regular basis. It is their baby. I have to follow their rules about what I eat and drink and how I look after myself."

Making babies the lesbian way has also become increasingly commercialised. Baby on Safari, set up seven years ago in Durban, South Africa, is part of the growing "Gaybe" revolution. It caters for overseas lesbian and gay couples who cannot "get a baby" in their own countries.

"Lesbians travel here from Australia, America and the UK," the woman who runs the service told me. "For them, even with the air fare and other expenses, it is still cheaper to get fertility treatment here than back home." 

BoS offers IVF treatment and has its own sperm bank. Men are catered for, too. If they want a baby, BoS will assist, so long as they bring their own eggs and surrogate mother to the clinic. "Lesbians want their own babies, and are thinking, ‘I can, therefore I want to.'" 

Kate and Lisa (not their real names) decided to start a family three years ago and signed up to a commercial donor company. Both white, they decided that it would be "ethically questionable" for them to request a donor of the same race and Lisa became pregnant with the sperm of a man of African origin. "I thought it may be racist in a way to exclude the possibility of a mixed-race child," says Kate. "After all, if I had met a black man and fallen in love I would have had dual-heritage children with him."

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Rupert DeBare
November 12th, 2010
3:11 PM
"Selfish" is the word here. While I have sympathy for homosexuals, my greater concern is for the child, who should have, as a basic human right, the right to a balanced parental upbringing -i.e. a mother AND a father. The healthy complementarity of masculine and feminine characteristics in the normal family is not some vagary of chance, but the very proof of perfection in evolutionary design, as evidenced by virtually every survey of social statistics. It's time we started putting the child first, and sacrificing our desires for the sake of his interests.

Anonymous
October 22nd, 2010
6:10 AM
I concur with the criticisms raised in the other posts and would like to add that the article would be much better if it focused more generally on the commercialization of childbirth and reduced the LGBT community to just one of many interested parties. What about infertile heterosexual couples? What about the companies and technology that make designer babies both possible and even profitable? The author calls designer babies ethically questionable. However, she's not clear enough about her own ethical position, especially when she writes, "Having a black child in an all white household is entirely different from one with one black parent. Did they not consider this?" What exactly is this great difference they were supposed to consider? Wasn't part of this couple's decision to move beyond race as a defining quality of a family?

Anonymous
October 5th, 2010
6:10 PM
Bindel writes that "While children's homes are full to bursting with abused, neglected and unwanted children, increasing numbers of lesbians and gay men are making their own, often spending huge amounts of money in order to conceive." Why do same-sex couples have any greater ethical imperative to relieve this situation through adoption than any other couple (or single person that uses a donor and/or IVF)? Doesn't this logic require that EVERYONE who wants to have a child adopt one of the unwanted children, including those who would reproduce using their own sperm, eggs, and uterus? The double standard that the author wants to impose, while not the most egregious aspect of her homophobia (that prize might go to the idea that gay men are shallow pursuers of "designer" babies, rather than people who want to both reproduce and parent with the person they love), does demonstrate her inability to bring even basic analytic rigour to her argument.

Anonymous
October 5th, 2010
9:10 AM
Clearly, only a homosexual couple would treat choosing egg donors like selecting a new set of curtains. Julie Bindel's career success is baffling.

Anonymous
September 30th, 2010
11:09 AM
I find your article sneering, devoid of human warmth and homophobic. Where was the talk of the reality of being a parent that every one of these surrogating parents have faced and will face? I find your continued emphasis of the term "Gaybe" insulting and infuriating. It just shows that blogging is a substandard and probably ill supervised form of writing as I doubt you would get away with this diatribe even in the Daily Mail. Yours, a disgruntled former reader.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.