You are here:   Faith > Britain Can Benefit from Benedict
 

For his part, Ratzinger acknowledged "pathologies in religion that are extremely dangerous and that make it necessary to see the divine light of reason as a ‘controlling organ'" in public life. As the first millennium Fathers of the Church had taught, "religion must continually allow itself to be purified and structured by reason". At the same time, there were "pathologies of reason" that had led to a loss of faith in reason. Thus, the prime cultural imperative of the moment was to recognise the "necessary relatedness between reason and faith and between reason and religion, which are called to purify and help one another", and which must "acknowledge this mutual need".

In brief, the Munich debate was a serious exploration of the cracks in the foundations of the Western democratic project, conducted by two men determined to avoid what Edward Skidelsky once labelled the "Punch and Judy show" character of so many debates between "science and religion". It seems that Richard Dawkins was not paying much attention to what transpired in Munich in January 2004. But perhaps others, less dogmatic in their 
anti-dogmatism, will pay attention when Pope Benedict XVI explores some of these same themes in his Westminster Hall address.

If his 2004 debate with Habermas and his lecture to the Italian Senate three months later give us, in capsule form, Ratzinger's analysis of Europe's cultural condition today, what role does he envisage for the Catholic Church in helping repair the damage that nihilism, scepticism and relativism have done to what he called, in the Italian Senate, "that which holds the world together"? 

Pope Benedict has sometimes been accused of being a nostalgic for the intact (Catholic) culture of his Bavarian youth, which was first destroyed by the Third Reich and then supplanted by a new Germany that eventually turned its back on both its Catholic and Lutheran roots. There is something to this, but Ratzinger is far too intelligent a man and far too sophisticated an analyst of the tides of history to imagine that any kind of rollback to a pre-modern (or pre-postmodern) past is possible. Rather, his first obligation, as he understands it, is to make Europe look closely at itself, in the unsparing but non-scolding way he did in the Italian Senate in early 2004: 

"At the hour of its greatest success, Europe seems hollow, as if it were internally paralysed by a failure of its circulatory system that is endangering its life, subjecting it to transplants that erase its identity. At the same time as its sustaining spiritual forces have collapsed, a growing decline in its ethnicity is also taking place.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Sean
September 23rd, 2010
2:09 PM
An excellent article. Just one small quibble: Iona and Lindisfarne were occupied by Celtic, not Benedictine, monks.

ptarmigan
September 18th, 2010
10:09 AM
An excellent article. Re Fabio's comment- quite. I have stopped reading British newspapers. Their hate-filled intolerance, in the name of what Benedict calls pathological relativism, make me ashamed to live here. But there is cause for optimism. I think Catholics have felt empowered and strengthened by this visit, myself included.

Tarquin
September 6th, 2010
5:09 PM
Qui bono regsrding the Pope's visit? The hate, mouth-foaming, and religious hostility is not small-minded anti-Papism from militant Protestants like it used to be. It's more much an expression of the hostility felt to the active criminal conspiracy by the Church's leaders to bury recognised criminal acts. In avoiding the issue, hiding behind spiritual humbug and unctuous pronouncements, and playing the victimisation card, a huge amount of the Church's moral authority has been lost, and it will take more than just harking back to conservative Catholic mores to put it right.

Fabio P.Barbieri
September 2nd, 2010
5:09 PM
I wish I were so optimistic. The Pope should never have accepted that invitation - from Gordon Brown, of all raging enemies of Christianity! - and if he had, he should have rescinded his acceptance after the Foreign Office scandal. This country has been encouraged for the last few years to hate to an extent not seen since the Gordon Riots, and we can expect trouble when he appears. Incidentally, I predict that a majority of any letters on this thread will be hate-ridden, foaming-at-the-mouth displays of religious hatred. I have some experience of the mood of the British newspaper reader, and currently it is ugly.

Margaretha
August 29th, 2010
1:08 PM
A very fine article by Weigel. Thank you!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.