You are here:   Features > How Jeremy Corbyn's Coup Hijacked Labour
 


Jeremy Corbyn encapsulated everything that was deceitful about his campaign to be leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition when he claimed he wanted to prioritise “the needs of the poor and the human rights of us all”. From the point of view of the poor and the oppressed, his words were a grim joke.

Like many from the Left’s dark corners, Corbyn does not believe in the human rights of “us all”. He is concerned only with the rights of those whose oppression is politically useful. If the oppressed’s suffering can be blamed on the West, he will defend them. If not, he is on their enemies’ side.

A short and far from comprehensive tour of the regimes Corbyn has supported includes the geriatric Cuban dictatorship, the corrupt and extraordinarily incompetent Chavistas who have come close to bankrupting oil-rich Venezuela, and Russian imperialists who have used force to redraw Europe’s boundaries.

You will not understand how a sickness on the Left has spread from the fringes to the mainstream, unless you pause, take a deep breath, pour a stiff drink and contemplate the strangeness of that list for a moment. In the 20th century, it would have had a kind of coherence. Cuba was then and remains a Communist country. Far-leftists, and indeed many who were not Marxists, placed the Castro dictatorship’s record in providing healthcare above its record of denying democratic rights, human rights and trade union rights. Their refusal to confront oppression may have been scandalous. But they were socialists so you could understand how they could reserve their condemnations for fascistic or conservative regimes. No one in the rich world took much notice of Venezuela before the millennium. But if you had explained that a socialist party would take power, jail opponents and restrict press freedom, they would have understood that the same double standards would apply to Chavez. As for Russia, our time travellers would assume that by “Russia” Corbyn meant the Soviet Union, and once again, they would have slotted his support into traditional notions of Left and Right.

The malaise on the modern Left becomes evident only when you remember what century you are living in. Russia does not pretend to be socialist now. It is a dictatorial kleptocracy, whose oligarchs stash their stolen money in Mayfair, Saint-Tropez and Palm Beach, and whose leader sends his armies over Russia’s borders to grab the territory of neighbouring states. Putin boasts to the world that he wants to be the leader of its reactionary and illiberal forces. He is committed to adventurism and the repression of minorities, particularly homosexuals. Modern Russia is the heir to the Tsarist empire, which 19th-century liberals and socialists feared above all other powers.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
amcdonald
October 7th, 2015
5:10 PM
Now the Tory Party elite are the stooges and running dogs of the Chinese Communist Party, Saudi Arabian billionaires and the Kremlin oligarchs. Austerity is `stalinised capitalism`. Cameron is one of the minor gobshites serving it . It will save the country and world! Under Corbynism no one will have shoes and there`ll be mosques on every corner. So it`s the Great Leader Chairman Mao Cameron or Jesus Corbyn.

amcdonald
September 16th, 2015
4:09 PM
bockers has every right to criticise the `secular ideology`,there`s nothing stopping him. I AM MY OWN PROPHET declared the topless Femen activists (Daily Mail,Telegraph etc). The Tories prophesise a Corbyn plague,famine and disaster. Islamophiliac/Sharia lovers entryism into Labour and Tory organisations continues. Who is the `threat to national security` here? Capitalism simply continues with a modernised Stalinism. The religious reject mortal reasoning because they can`t `do` reasoning. All believers and non-believers go home to the same pagan modernism ( plumbing,electricity, smart phones,computers,televisions,fridges,microwaves....) Left and Right are sub-cultures of global pagan modernism. Camille Paglia first raised the subject in her best-seller book `Sexual Personae- Art,Sex and Death since Nefertiti`. Actual advances in popular culture aren`t a feature of Standpoint either. Neutral,analytical scholarship isn`t popular with politicians anywhere. But the ( pagan modernist) public enjoy and support it.

Robotnyck
September 15th, 2015
11:09 PM
Far more honest to openly take payment and act accordingly than to parade as a socialist and give your support to a neo-fascist authoritarian. As for Corbyn's Morning Star article, it might have well been written by a Kremlin hack so closely does it follow the Kremlin propaganda line at the time.

bockers
September 15th, 2015
3:09 PM
As usual thoughtful and well written positive responses - nasty, shallow and ineloquent negative ones. The west hating left cultists don't even feel the need to put up coherent arguments anymore - it is now a secular ideology that unbelievers have no right to criticise.

amcdonald
September 12th, 2015
3:09 PM
Now Jeremy Corbyn is leader that`s at least a custard pie in the face of Brown,Blair,Cameron etc. And victory to the Kurdish Army. If the Isis nutters are killed by a woman they don`t go to paradise. Where is the Tories support for the heroic Kurds ?

Gregor Samsa
September 11th, 2015
10:09 AM
Fascinating that a guy who supported the war in Iraq is speaking about the "oppressed people".

Lawrence
September 7th, 2015
7:09 AM
Cohen doesn't go far enough in his criticisms of Corbyn and the far Left and the mainstream Left for that matter. It's worse than he lets on. There is no hope or redemption in the Left, any more than in any other political group or ideology. Corbyn though is exactly who the British Left deserve as their leader, there are consequences to decades of Jew-baiting and Islamophilia by the BBC, the Guardian, The Independent, the unions etc.

Barry the Red
September 3rd, 2015
9:09 AM
Nick Cohen's discomfort in using terms relating to the Left is entirely justified. The mentality he describes should not be regarded as left. He is closer to the mark when he speaks of the left 'shading' into the Right. I don't think politics can be properly understood without the conceptual tool 'pseudo-left'. This should be widely popularised and then maybe a genuine left, that decries all imperialism, and supports democratic struggle, can be revived.

Former Journo
September 2nd, 2015
8:09 AM
Bloody hell, what a boring read. Doubt it would appeal to anyone other than a few Guardian readers. Do you make a decent living from this twaddle, Nick? I mean, seriously? People pay you for this?

Matthew50
August 31st, 2015
11:08 PM
This is what Jeremy Corbyn said in the Queens Speech on foreign policy; http://jeremycorbyn.org.uk/articles/queens-speech-britain-in-the-world/ . So what different to the monster Nicj Cohen portrays him as. I have always rated Nick Cohen as a journalist and don't quite understand why he is so angry towards Corbyn.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.