You are here:   Arnold Schoenberg > Riot of Spring
 

Stravinsky had reached into the feral sources of Russian civilisation, far into the unforgiving tundra where life is raucous, brutal and cheap. His sub-titles describe abduction, human sacrifice, tribal wars, worship. A lone bassoon heralds a pagan ceremony, followed by a pounding of war drums. This was not an augury of human progress. It was a glorification of primitivism that challenged the values of modern society. Its response was reciprocal violence.

Much the same anxieties were aroused when Schoenberg exposed Vienna to the idea that a tonal scale which defined the notes C and E as harmony and B and D as discord was not the only option open to a composer. When Schoenberg veered off the octave in the middle of his second string quartet, he was embracing not a bold, new atonality of unfettered freedoms but a forgotten pre-tonality — the open mode that existed before the establishment of Western classical music. Schoenberg, like Stravinsky, was turning the clock back, not forward.

Both men acknowledged this ambivalence by their subsequent decisions. Stravinsky, uprooted from Russia by war and Bolshevism, went on to invent a neo-classical style that, reactionary by definition, pampered audiences with comfort sounds. Schoenberg, "a conservative who was forced to become a revolutionary", grew quickly out of anything-goes atonality and replaced it with a synthetic, serial scale of 12 notes in a preordained order that would reinvent music rather than revert it to chaos. Stravinsky, late in life, embraced Schoenberg's serialism as his badge of modernity. The Rite had been, in this respect, a regressive aberration.

He twice revised its score, in 1921 and again in 1943, for the purpose of making it "more manageable for conductor and orchestra". It had never been his intention to disrupt public order, or to renounce the unspoken entente cordiale between composers and audiences that each will kindly tolerate the other. In the spring of 1913, two composers tested that alliance to its limits. None has ever breached it again.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
victor eskenasy
June 22nd, 2013
1:06 PM
Yes, Jonathan and correctly. It's strange that the most important testimony is forgotten by most of the critics who wrote this year about the Rite. Evidently the reactions where directed most of them against the ballet not to the music itself! I wrote about, but Norman didn't read... Romanian :) http://www.europalibera.org/content/article/25007965.html

Jonathan Sternberg
May 31st, 2013
9:05 PM
If you want the real story, little of which appears here, you must consult the memoirs of Pierre Monteux, whose name never appears in any of these reports.

Aaarielrielnonymous
May 31st, 2013
1:05 PM
Pointless article .....

Maxim Gershunoff
May 31st, 2013
1:05 PM
Having known Igor Stravinsky personally and professionally, as I did, he made specific comment to me of young writers asking about "Rite of Spring," "They would ask 'How did you ever compose music so descriptive of infinity matching the scenery with its symbol of infinity?' Did you ever hear such a stupid question? They tend to overintellectualize. Example...if pianist in pit at silent movie improvise by accident what is happening on screen, he is genius." As regarding revising his score "making it more manageable to conductor and orchestra," perhaps you overlooked his actual motiviation which was to keep his scores changed over so slightly for the purpose of renewing copyrights and continuing royalties.

John Borstlap
May 31st, 2013
11:05 AM
The gist of this article is, although contrary to received wisdom, TRUE: Stravinsky did not violate the fundamentals of the art form, which are rooted in tonality, being the natural 'gravity force' that keeps sounds and notes together and provides the means of meaningful narrative and expression. If anything, he added new ways of intensifying tonality (as Wagner did with his Tristan). Schönberg however, went over the brink and came-back with something utterly artificial not based upon the natural overtone series (which define tonality): twelve-tone 'music', which sounds like all the wrong notes Brahms had left out. Stravinsky's so-called 'neo-classicism' was not 'pandering to audiences' and 'reactionary', but a normal artistic reaction upon a period of wild experimentation, and his music of this period is, in fact, expressive as any good music is (violin concerto, piano concerto, Apollon, Symphony of Psalms, etc.). Schönberg however, got stuck in his quasi-classical attempts to 'revive' the musical tradition.

samba
May 30th, 2013
4:05 PM
Modernism really began much before the 20th century,it took the ideals of "the enlightenment "reaching a certian level of saturation to become apparent. The machine gave the Industrial powers the illusions of humans conquering nature,uninterupted progress,and esp of having triumphed over the base,the primative, the barbaric, lower ,animal nature and so on. Rite of Spring is the prelude to the nemeisis of such hubris, which soon arrived as WWI

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.