You are here:   Bach > A Passion for Bach
 
There is something to this notion. There is more in Handel of an Italian sprezzatura, ­music for pleasure; while Bach speaks more to the German taste for the earnest and the meta­physical. Handel died rich; Bach comfortable. Handel was one of music’s great plag­iarists, repeating himself and stealing from others with ruthless abandon, while Bach seems to have generated most of his musical material himself. On the other hand, George Frideric Handel was a deeply religious man; and Johann Sebastian Bach was certainly not some sort of angelic musical aesthete. Nonetheless, the latter has achieved a sort of pre-eminence in music, a saintly quality, which has made his reputation immune to the vagaries of fashion or style ever since the rediscovery of his music by the ­romantic composers more than a century and a half ago.

After a long break — six years or so — I have been spending a lot of time with Bach over the past weeks on two very contrasting projects: a St John and a St Matthew Passion. St John’s Gospel is, of the four, the most theologically-minded and mystical. Nevertheless, Bach makes of it, in his St John Passion, a work more deeply personal and thrustingly dramatic than the more monumental and later St Matthew Passion, the work which he consciously saw as part of his legacy.

In the John Passion, singing, as I do, the part of the Evangelist, the storyteller, it is very easy and, I think, proper to become involved in the act of narration and in the emotions of the narrative (though some people, misunderstanding the whole thrust of 18th-century German piety, find it vulgar). Bach takes very seriously the notion that St John was a witness to these events, a friend and disciple of Jesus Christ and the comforter of his mother. While the Matthew Passion’s narrative is just as dramatic, with as much tenderness, violence and passion, the greater number of reflective arias sung as if by present-day Christians who meditate on and participate in the drama both interrupt the narrative more and lend the whole work a more universal aspect.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Janet Kenny
May 31st, 2008
3:05 AM
I am surprised, and yet perhaps not surprised, to read such a misunderstanding of Handel and of Italian music, from Ian Bostridge, a great interpreter and singer. We all have our blind spots. Ian Bostridge has a genius for finding the human longing in the music of the great northern European composers, from Bach to Britten. I was once a professional singer and performed the alto solo part in Bach's Passion according to St. Matthew in Crawley, England. Another great "Ian" (Partridge) was the sublime Evangelist on that occasion. It was during that performance that I realised that the seeds of the tragedy of the 20th century were germinating in that work. To claim a greater purity for Bach over the sunny innocence of Handel shows,in my experience, a conditioned response that does not reflect reality. I must revere Bach but I also revere Handel. As for plagiarism in the music of Handel, Bach was not shy about appropriating the music of Vivaldi. It was a common practice and part of the musical conversation. Janet Kenny Janet Kenny

Savta Dotty
May 30th, 2008
9:05 AM
Having just listened to "Erbarme Dich" on my iPod while riding the bus, I can only applaud your return to my favorite work of music of all time, "The Saint Matthew Passion." As a secular Jew, I have always felt that Bach's music, like no one else's, transcends man-made religious categories and offers us Religion with a capital "R."

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.