You are here:   Blogs >Nick Cohen > Rushdie on Jon Stewart
Standpoint Blogs
 
 
Nick Cohen
Tuesday 2nd November 2010
Rushdie on Jon Stewart

In my previous post about Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam I quoted Salman Rushdie's surprise that Jon Stewart had given a starring role at his "Rally for Sanity" to a crooner who had previously opined that Rushdie deserved to die for deciding of his own free will to abandon Islam and criticise its texts.

 Salman has messaged me again and says,

I spoke to Jon Stewart about Yusuf Islam's appearance. He said he was sorry it upset me, but really, it was plain that he was fine with it. Depressing.

"Pathetic" is the word I would use. If members of the Tea Party said that American intellectuals who renounced Christiainity deserved to die for their apostasy would Stewart be fine with that too? Of course he wouldn't. His eyes would roll, his voice would thunder and that charming schoolboy smile would vanish from his face. He would never forget, until they repudiated.

With intellectuals from the Muslim world, it is a different matter entirely. Stewart does not seem to mind that Cat Yusuf Stevens Islam has never apologized for his support for Salman's murder, which I documented in the post below. Stewart, and from what I can gather many others on the American Left, are now aping a liberal form of racism we have had in Europe for years. Its unprincipled adherents hold fanatics to be guilty of nothing more than forgivable rhetorical excess when they deliver excuses for murder. They are free to justify threats to novelists or the oppression of women, gays, free-thinkers etc. if — and only if — the novelists, apostates, women, gays, free thinkers etc. have brown rather than white skins.

But then what beyond rank hypocrisy did American liberals expect? They allowed their political movement to be led by comedians, and cannot complain if they get a blackly comic illustration of the "racism of the anti-racists" in return.

 
Like this article? Share, save or print using the icons below
Delicious   Digg   StumbleUpon   Propeller   Reddit   Magnoliacom   Newsvine   Furl   Facebook   Google   Yahoo   Technorati   Icerocket   Print   Mail   Twitter   
Share/Save
 
 
 
Hermes
November 4th, 2010
11:11 AM
John Stewart is a "progressive" and as such he will do everything in his power to ingratiate himself with the people of the "religion of peace". Personally, I can't stand the bloke from the moment, many moons ago, when I accidentally caught sight of his smug face whilst channel hopping. @Anonymous (November 4th, 2010 3:11 AM) "It's clear to me that Stewart endorsed the music of Cat Stevens, not the character of the man himself". Would he endorse Gary Glitter's music?

Larry in Tel Aviv
November 4th, 2010
9:11 AM
Rushdie should not be surprised with Stewart's hypocrisy and indifference re Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam. Stewart is a cookie cutter moral relativist Leftist, smug, self-righteous and clueless. This is a "Jew" who drops his Jewish surname, Leibowitz for Stewart to 'fit in better', so if he's prepared to sell his birthright to ingratiate himself with a leftwing audience partial to anti-Semitism, why be surprised at his indifference to Yusuf's Muslim radicalism? Stewart is ashamed of his Jewish heritage (why else drop his obviously Jewish surname?), unlike Cohen who keeps his surname even though he isn't Jewish. Stewart is more representative of a strong strain within New York "Jewry" than most anybody realizes. Assimmilation at all costs, even if that means selling your heritage down the river. Pathetic, cowardly and disgusting.

Kaffir
November 4th, 2010
4:11 AM
"That doesn't actually describe Stewart though, Nick - he reviled the miniature group "Revolution Muslim" for making death threats against the creators of "South Park" last April, and concluded by doing the "Go f**k yourself" dance." ____ I saw that segment too, and thought that that was very weak on Jon Stewart's part, who, otherwise, is quite good at skewering others. He seemed to be at a loss as to how to respond to the death-threats issued to Comedy Central - maybe it was the lack of a face/name, or maybe he didn't want any crazy Muslim issuing him with a death-threat, or worse, following up on it.

Anonymous
November 4th, 2010
3:11 AM
This whole column is garbage. What Cohen is suggesting is that Stewart & his fans endorse Jihadist terrorism. Stewart is not above criticism, but if you're going to criticize, come with facts. Here, for example, is Stewart defending Trey Parker & Matt Stone, the creators of "South Park" against Viacom, his and their employer, when the company whimped out on an episode of "South Park" depicting the prophet Muhammed. The Islamic extremists threatening the two men were not spared, either: http://bit.ly/bFP9KS It's clear to me that Stewart endorsed the music of Cat Stevens, not the character of the man himself.

Aaron Worthing of Patterico's Pontifications
November 3rd, 2010
2:11 PM
just wanted to tell you this was a good catch with rushdie. it was deeply wrong for Stewart to have done this. and hypocritical, but i am less concerned with hypocrisy than being just plain wrong. I have made two posts about your rushdie quotes over at patterico's, and i appreciated that someone kept the outrage going.

Weary G
November 3rd, 2010
2:11 PM
Interesting to see the various dodges and apologia from those to avoid confronting the central fact, although the one bringing up the Iraq was amusing as cliche'. It does not matter if Stewart is a comedian (he is) and not a partisan hack (he is) or whether it was a comedy stunt or serious rally (who cares?). Stewart, Colbert, and thousands of self-righteous twits who claim the Tea Party is the second coming of the Klan/Third Reich, stood on stage with or cheered on a man who called for the assassination of a author for something he WROTE, advocated the STONING OF WOMEN and supported the imposition of a theo-fascist state. None of these positions has he officially apologized and retracted as I understand it. I don't know whether Nick Cohen is right or left, (I am new to the site) but I sympathize with his frustration with the blinkered hypocrisy and double-standards. I would add the chilling aspect of looking into what seem like alien minds. This kind of cold indifference to horrible people in their midst is why many think the left is completely out of its goddamn mind. Either that, or they really are 5th columnists of a sort, because what else are we left to believe? Go ahead, mouth-foam away at me. I will indeed look at some of you as mad dogs.

Curious
November 3rd, 2010
2:11 PM
Anonymous - if that is your real name - can you please explain to me the point you are trying to make please? Is it that other nutters say bad things too? I don't want to speak for Nick, but I'm fairly sure he'd agree with you on that, so what is it you're trying to say?

Anonymous
November 3rd, 2010
9:11 AM
A fair reading is that he is a zealous convert who was offended by Rushdie's book, was asked about the controversy, and made ill-advised comments on it, which he later tried to moderate but didn't repudiate. If he is a clerical fascist, then so are Catholics who say extreme things about 'artists' who do strange things with the crucifix or images of Mary.

No apology? No forgiveness
November 2nd, 2010
9:11 PM

Yoni
November 2nd, 2010
9:11 PM
I do think this is slightly untrue, Nick: the free pass is given if the perpetrators have (or are deemed to have) 'brown skin', not the victims. Racism by Islamists against European Jews is given a free pass, after all.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
 
About Nick Cohen

Nick Cohen is a columnist for the Observer and author of You Can't Read This Book: Censorship in an Age of Freedom (Fourth Estate) and What's Left? How The Left Lost Its Way (Harper Perennial). Living With Lies, a collection of his writing for Standpoint, is available as an ebook. 

Recent Blog Posts
Blog List
More Posts
Popular Standpoint topics