You are here:   Ethnicity > Refugee in his Own Country
 

Who stands up for Robert Redeker today? Intellectuals such as Roger-Pol Droit, Claude Lanzmann and Pierre-André Taguieff. Certainly not his former colleagues. "Leftists and teachers' unions would rather defend a terrorist convicted of murder like Cesare Battisti than defend me, a man in danger of being murdered by terrorists," he says. (France agreed to extradite Battisti to Italy. He had lived in France for 20 years under the protection of a refuge policy established by President François Mitterrand and repealed by the Sarkozy government. But after a campaign led by Carla Bruni, he has since been granted asylum in Brazil.

Is it possible to speak freely about Islam today in France? No, replies Redeker, freedom of expression is under constant pressure from the fallacious notion of "Islamophobia". The term, invented by Ayatollah Khomeini to stifle critics, equates the legitimate criticism of a religion and its ideology with racism. Reasonable people are frightened, he says, by Islamist ideology and barbaric practices. "It's not a question of Islam as religious belief but as a coercive ideology that crushes millions of human beings under its implacable yoke." Europeans justifiably fear the loss of freedoms won in bitter struggles over centuries; they fear the intrusion of religion in politics, jeopardising the separation of church and state.

"Islam is the only religion that frightens people," says Redeker. "All over the world, Islam shows a face of hatred, intolerance, injustice, and archaism." The term "Islamophobia," he explains, was invented to make opposition to Islam a criminal offence, a typical totalitarian ploy. (Indeed, the parallel between anti-Semitism and Islamophobia is systematically established in FRA documents and echoed in tracts published by associations for Jewish-Muslim entente. Islamophobia is invoked whenever a mosque is vandalised, Muslim tombs are desecrated or an act of jihad mass murder is denounced.)

How does Robert Redeker reply to detractors who ask why anti-Semitism is punished while defamation of Islam is defended? He argues that criticism or fear of Islam - a religion, a system of thought, a world view, an ideology - is acceptable in a liberal society. Hatred of Jews as a people is not.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
egil
July 2nd, 2009
3:07 AM
For a daily reminder of the threat of Islam to Western freedoms, go to jihadwatch.org if you haven't already done so. Its very eye-opening, as this article should be to those who haven't faced what the threats are.

Jon M
February 10th, 2009
10:02 PM
Heroic post. It brings this new reader much joy to see people standing up to Islam, the 21st century Fascism!

Gary O
February 6th, 2009
1:02 PM
I am begining to like Standpoint. What with Douglas Murray's article and now this, a ray of hope has shone through my state of dispair regarding the cowardly attitude of our main stream media in the face of islamisation of the West. Britain (and the West in general) still has a chance of preserving its culture, religion and identity given people like Messrs Murray and Redeker. Just one final point: criticising islam is neither islamophobic nor racist and those who have the courage to speak out must not be labelled as such in order that they may fall silent. Thank you Standpoint.

Anonymous
February 2nd, 2009
12:02 PM
Bravo. It is becoming clear that Islam is at war with the west, we must quickly put a stop to it's expansion, or we will all be slaves. Mohamed killed people, it's only a matter of time...

Geoffrey Cain
February 1st, 2009
10:02 PM
Everyone should support Robert Redeker in every way they can.

Soult
January 31st, 2009
10:01 PM
The Editors of Standpoint and its readership must educate themselves in the following facts: There is the UN sponsored Universal Declaration of Human Rights signed in 1948 by most members of the UN and then there is the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam signed in 1990 by 54 Moslem nations. The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam is in direct contravention of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: it does not grant freedom of religion, it states that all crimes and punishments are determined only by Sharia Law and it asserts the domination of Islam over all other belief systems, political ideologies and jurisprudences. Note especially Articles 19, 24 and 25 of this Cairo Declaration. Here is the link to a site which provides the texts of both the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam: http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/Ohmyrus30816.htm It is essential that this is made widely known in the British, European and American media because it is this Cairo Declaration which the EU and the UN, by acceding to the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Conference) demand to declare criticism of Islam to be "islamophobic" and therefore a crime,will actually assist in bringing Europe and even America, under the yoke of Islam and its degrading Sharia law. Also, little things do matter and words have power: kindly cease referring to Islam's warlord founder, Mohamed, as "Prophet": to billions of people throughout the world, Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, atheists, etc, this man could never be described or revered as such. Also, start informing your readership of the doctrines of Islam (taqiyya, Abrogation of verses in the Koran), of Jihad, of Islam's history of bloody conquest, denigration of peoples, cultures, faiths and lands and, especially, of Mohamed (the supporting Hadiths, especially of Bukhari and the Sira, biography of Mohamed will assist as these are considered, along with the Qur'an, to be the 'holy' texts in Islam). The truth shall set us ALL free, including those enslaved by Islam.

Anonymous
January 29th, 2009
1:01 PM
bravo r redeker, bravo the writer. reader in ireland .

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.