You are here:   Text > Was Crucifixion a Jewish Penalty?
 

As a preliminary to the evaluation of the earliest stages of rabbinic legislation formulated in Mishnah Sanhedrin 7:1, it must be recalled that after the destruction by the Romans in 70 CE of Jerusalem and the consequent disappearance of the Judaean state institutions, Rome deprived Jewish law courts of capital jurisdiction. However, these courts quietly pretended that they still possessed it. Hence they continued to legislate and redefined stoning and burning. They even added two new forms of death penalties to those of the Bible: beheading and strangling. At the same time, the rabbis shied away from the idea of actually condemning a Jew to death and described as bloodthirsty the tribunal that imposed one capital sentence a year.

The rabbinic stoning process takes the condemned outside the town, to the edge of a slight elevation twice the height of a man, say 3.5 metres. One witness pushed the guilty person so that he/she fell down from the ridge. If the fall resulted in death, the "stoning" was completed. If not, the second witness dropped a large stone on the heart of the condemned. If this was still not enough, the whole community went on throwing stones until death ensued. Stoning was followed by the ritual hanging of the body on a tree or gibbet until the evening.

While the Bible takes the burning to death of a criminal in the literal sense on a pile of wood, Mishnah Sanhedrin 7:2 defines this mode of execution differently. The condemned was immobilised by being put into dung up to the knees. The two witnesses then started to strangle him/her, forcing the man or woman to gape and thus allow the insertion of a lethal burning "wick" into the mouth. According to the Talmud, this wick was in fact hot melted lead.

Beheading was a mode of execution reserved for the civil authority. The Bible never refers to decapitation, but we know that it was practised not only by Rome but also by Herodian rulers. King Herod Agrippa I (41-44 CE), for example, is reported to have ordered the execution with the sword of the apostle James, son of Zebedee.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
April 11th, 2013
11:04 AM
Simply use CE for Christian Era and BCE for Before Christian Era, simples! And it doesn’t half annoy the "academicians".

Marina DeLuca
April 11th, 2013
12:04 AM
The key behind this piece is the use of the term "CE" as opposed to AD. The "academicians" a while back figured out a clever way to avoid mentioning any reference to God ', and hence, Anno Domine was changed to the Common Era, and BC (Before Christ) was changed to BCE. Oh yes, the article; this is simply a way of suggesting that the Jews had nothing to do with the crucifixion of Jesus Christ––it was a Roman thing, you know. Really?

Anonymous
April 4th, 2013
1:04 PM
Interestingly Josephus records in Antiquities of the Jews, (xx.9)that the High Priest Ananus ben Ananus took advantage of a hiatus between Roman governors to assemble a Sanhedrin who condemned James, the brother of Jesus, "on the charge of breaking the law," then had him executed by stoning. This has been dated to AD 62. The version of the death recorded by the church historian Eusebius says James was thrown from the pinnacle of the Temple before being stoned.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.