You are here:   Features > The Operation That Can Ruin Your Life
 

There is a handful of radicals in the world today who have dared to challenge the diagnosis of transsexualism. Those who do are called "transphobic" and treated with staggering vitriol. There is a form of cultural relativism at play here. Defenders of female genital mutilation or forced marriage often use the argument that such practices can be justified within certain communities (i.e. non-Western cultures), despite the fact that they serve to dehumanise women, because it is the "truth" of that particular community. After I had been shortlisted for the Stonewall award, scores of blogs and message boards filled with a call to arms against me. 

On one, "Genocide and Julie Bindel", a poster wrote, "What would Stonewall's reaction have been had a BME [black and minority ethnic] group nominated Ayatollah Khomeini as Politician of the Year? She is an active oppressor of trans people. I hope she dies an agonising and premature death of cancer in the very near future. It would make the world a better place."

I had some support, some from those who had also experienced a transsexual-led witchhunt. I heard from post-operative trans-sexuals who had been railroaded into surgery and now regretted it. "Do not publish my name," said one, "but if anyone questions the validity of sex-change treatment you are sent to Coventry by the ‘community' elders." 

A police officer who, during the course of his duty, was unfairly accused by transsexuals of "transphobia" was driven to a breakdown by their vicious campaign. An eminent medical ethicist who had dared to defend a fellow professional who had questioned the diagnosis of GD from a scientific point of view almost lost his career and reputation. And several women from feminist organisations have been bullied and vilified for challenging the "right" of male-to-female transsexuals to work in women-only organisations. 

Dr Caillean McMahon, a US-based forensic psychiatrist, defines herself not as a transsexual but as a "woman of operative history. The trans community has an unforgiving global sort of condemnation towards critical outsiders. I have to be suspicious that the insistence of many of those demanding to enter it is not for the purpose of celebrating the spirit and nature of women, but to seek an enforced validation, extracted by force in a legal or political manner." With the normalisation of transsexual surgery comes an acceptance of other forms of surgery to correct a mental disorder. In 2000, Russell Reid, a psychiatrist who has diagnosed hundreds of people with GD, was involved in controversy over the condition known as Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), where sufferers can experience a desperate urge to rid themselves of a limb. Reid referred two BDD patients to a surgeon for leg amputations. "When I first heard of people wanting amputations, it seemed bizarre in the extreme," he said in a TV documentary. "But then I thought, ‘I see transsexuals and they want healthy parts of their body removed in order to adjust to their idealised body image,' and so I think that was the connection for me. I saw that people wanted to have their limbs off with equally as much degree of obsession and need."

In a world where equality between men and women was reality, transsexualism would not exist. The diagnosis of GD needs to be questioned and challenged. We live in a society that, on the whole, respects the human rights of others. Accepting a situation where the surgeon's knife and lifelong hormonal treatment are replacing the acceptance of difference is a scandal. Sex-change surgery is unnecessary mutilation. Using human rights laws to normalise trans-sexualism has resulted in a backward step in the feminist campaign for gender equality. Perhaps we should give up and become men.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Grant
April 6th, 2011
3:04 AM
Her entire foundation of transsexualism - that trans people are unhappy with their gender roles - is suspect. Until she meets some actual transsexual people and starts to understand what is really going on, I will consider her to be someone who is famous for saying bigoted things with big words and therefore gets away with murder. Yes, murder, because her ideas lead to other people to treat trans people as less than human, one step closer to wanting them not to exist. She should stop wasting her breath and concentrate on something that she actually understands and doesn't lead to the further marginalization of a population that desperately needs support. Shame on her.

MJ
April 6th, 2011
2:04 AM
Your ignorance on this subjects astounds and disgusts me. As a feminist who feels just as strongly about the rights of my transgendered sisters as I do my cis ones, I really hope you stop speaking for the feminist community.

Anonymous
March 13th, 2011
6:03 PM
Ok so Bindel says, if no one cared or there were not "male/female" dichotomies there would not be transsexualism. This statement shows the ignorance of people who think this way. For people born with transsexualism it isn't about the clothing, the job, the person they are attracted to, what they like to play with etc, it's about their inner being and outer body not the same. People born with transsexualism have been around long before the term transsexualism was created/medicalised. Back in those ages since there was no surgical or even hormonal support, it was important for that person to learn how to look as best as they could on the outside how they felt on the inside. Clothing was important in that aspect then as it is now. So that others see them as they know themselves to be. To allow them to live their lives healthy, happy and productive. In many ways I feel pity for Bindel, because it's her close mindedness that stops her from seeing the world as it can be and in many cases is. I read somewhere where Bindel comments about how people not within the community of those born with transsexualism being labeled transphobic when they speak against supportive rights and treatments. But isn't that the same when someone not lesbian, especially male, speaks about lesbian issues and concerns? So people pity the Bindel(don't want to gender Bindel since Bindel hates gender)for the Bindel knows not what they speak about.

Anonymous
December 29th, 2010
10:12 PM
This article makes a couple of halfway decent points. It is a bit dangerous to get out of hand with diagnoses of GD and anything like it. However, it becomes totally obvious that you're letting your personal ideology completely dictate your opinion on this, but are presenting it as unbiased facts. Why bother?

Leah
December 25th, 2010
11:12 PM
Transgender was a term made after many gay & lesbain saught surgery to avoid discrimination, this made those who truely believed to be the wrong gender' lives harder. Transgender, the term, mean psychologically identify as opposite sex while disregarding sexuality. Transgender people do in fact look forward a miracle wand to experience even the downfalls of their desired role. Transgender male to female wish periods were possible and transgender female to male wish involuntary erections would happen. I am transgender, I wish I could give birth, something than a cosmetic change! However, we choose the best dealable cards, sex changing.

Anonymous
December 18th, 2010
12:12 AM
I absolutely love the way that in one article you can attack both genital surgery and the alternative of not genital surgery. And as for the definition you mentioned, I fail to see how such an informed writer on the subject could confuse transgender and transsexual. A girl playing football may be seen and questioning her gender identity, that however is far from her wishing to live the rest of her life as a fully fledged man in the eyes of the world.

Anonymous
December 17th, 2010
5:12 PM
Penis phobia much?

Jonathan Warner
November 10th, 2010
9:11 AM
Ms. Bindel's argument seems (to me) to proceed from a naturalistic fallacy - that there is a natural order to the body that must not be altered. Yet her queer philosophy of free gender expression (which I agree with totally) is contrary in itself to the naturalistic fallacy adhered to by homophobes, that "men should be men, and women should be women," and that sexuality should align itself with biology. Julie, you cannot have your cake and eat it. Also, Ms Bindel places restrictions on this freedom of expression of gender identity, by saying that this expression cannot itself follow sterotypes, even if those stereotypes are the opposite gender to the person's physical sex. This in itself is freedom-denying while claiming to advocate freedom. These contradictions seem to leave only one basic premise to Ms. Bindel's argument - prejudice, and basic animal dislike of people who are different to her. This is sad as she still says many thinks I would agree with. Why not have freedom of expression in physiology, as well as behaviour and dress?

Fancy Nancy
November 9th, 2010
7:11 PM
I thought Julie Bindel was fighting for the deconstruction of gender, which she claims is a social construct. So what is this sudden about-turn? Apparently, transsexuals are not their gender of choice because, in her words: "Medical science cannot turn a biological male into a biological female — it can only alter the appearance of body parts. A trans-sexual "woman" will always be a biological male. " So gender is determined by your genitals and it's not a social construct after all? All those years of second-wave feminism where for nought?

some gay guy
November 5th, 2010
12:11 AM
It's your body and your life to lead as you please. If you are biologically male and you want to have your penis and testicles removed, take female hormones, and live as a woman, it's none of my business. Ditto for biologically female - if you want to have your female "plumbing" removed, take male hormones, and live as a man, that, too, is none of my business. I can't I understand gender dysphoria, but I'm sure I would understand it better if I suffered from it. Your choices should not be limited. If you want to live pre-op and assume the opposite gender's appearance, do it. If you want to live post-op and assume the opposite gender's appearance, do it. I read an interesting article by a man with prostate cancer. He said that testosterone causes prostate cancer to grow faster, so they pumped him full of female hormones to counter the testosterone. He said it was only then that he discovered himself behaving in ways that he had previously associated with females. This led him to believe that some female behaviors are biological and not just the result of socialization. I found this very interesting and informative. I had always assumed that gender was entirely socialized - men were brought up to be tough, macho, competitive. Women were raised to like dolls, wear makeup, be (broadly speaking) less aggressive, etc. Yet, that doesn't explain "flamers" (very effeminate gay men), nor does it explain butch lesbians. While there are gay men who play and enjoy sports, most of the gay men I know were never good at sports and are not as "ultra-butch" as some straight men seem to be. While there are "lipstick" lesbians,we have all seen "butch" lesbians too and in my limited experience with lesbians, it appears to me that butch lesbians outnumber "lipstick lesbians", just as less butch gay men seem to generally outnumber the macho gay man. Genetics and hormones could explain much of these things about transgender/gay/lesbian people.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.