You are here:   Constitutional Affairs > ONLINE ONLY: The UN Human Rights Council: Not Fit for Purpose
 

And while Libya is not a member of the Council, Najat al-Hajjaji is back. She is chairperson of the preparatory committee for the 2009 Durban Review Conference. Cuba is vice-chairperson, and other committee members include Iran and Pakistan. The conference will take place in Geneva. It will review the 2001 World Conference Against Racism in Durban, which turned into a hate-fest against Israel and Jews. The US and Israeli delegations walked out.

Already, Mrs al-Hajjaji is proving true to form, allowing Arab and Islamic countries to filibuster and use procedural devices to marginalise and exclude Jewish and pro-Israel NGOs. The Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy eventually withdrew its application for accreditation to ‘Durban II' as the Review Conference is dubbed, after repeated and fervent objections from Iran. The Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign was accredited without any difficulties. Canada has already announced that it will boycott the Durban Review Conference, and the US, UK, France, Germany and Israel may follow.

All of which begs the question, does it matter what the UN Human Rights Council decides? After all, most of the world's population has never even heard of the body. But yes, it matters very much. In the best Orwellian tradition, the abusers club has hijacked the very language of human rights. At the same time, states such as Egypt and Iran argue with increasing confidence that rights such as free speech and free association are ‘western' concepts irrelevant to the developing world. They claim it is ‘politically biased' to single out regimes that abuse human rights, and that all problems in the middle east have Israel as a source.

The dark farce of the Council certainly matters to Abdel Kareem Soliman, an Egyptian blogger, jailed in 2007 for four years after a five minute trial, for insulting Islam and President Hosni Mubarak. It certainly matters to the family of Mohammed Hassanzadeh, a seventeen year old Iranian who was hanged at Sanandaj prison on June 10, in direct contravention of international law which forbids the execution of minors. And it should matter to us. The Durban Review Conference will cost at least $6.8 million, monies drawn from the UN budget, all of which is paid for by member states, meaning taxpayers. We are funding a hate-fest for human rights abusers to castigate the west. Why?

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Ron
September 22nd, 2008
4:09 PM
The UN has become some sort of comfort or addiction because otherwise it’s hard to see why western countries put up with it. Absolutely nothing of value has come out of this organisation in a long time and now it is used to destroy the very foundations on which it stands. The countries doing it are, as the article suggest, well organised and the UN now is just another tier in the struggle to destroy western values which are seen as a threat.

john d
September 22nd, 2008
12:09 PM
Against Richard: we should, pace John McCain, found a League of Democracies (membership by invitation onlyWe should not quit the UN where the West still has 3 vetos. Only if the ~General Assembly attempts to take over from the Security Council. Only then should we quit the UN en bloc and immediately suspend all foreign aid to those states who support the OIC's destruction of the UN.

devorgilla
September 22nd, 2008
12:09 AM
The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights (1990) is sharia based and has been adopted by all the Organisation of the Islamic Conference countries (57 states) in 1997. The aim is to supplant UNDHR (1948) with this document. That will mean global human rights will be defined by sharia, which is a discriminatory system which does not recognise the rights of other religions or non-Islamic world views. IF this succeeds it will be Stage One in the Global Caliphate. Frightening.

Richard
September 21st, 2008
11:09 PM
I spoke about this hijacking and abuse the language of human rights last year during a symposium about Amnesty International. The only course left to the West in the long run is to abandon the United Nations as a failed institution and form a league of democracies. We cannot pretend that the UN has any sort of legitimacy,

Frances Waddams
September 21st, 2008
11:09 PM
Well said, Sir!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.