You are here:   Anti-Semitism > Labour's Antisemitism Problem
 
The fact remains that Naz Shah needed no help from Ken. He chose to weigh in on her behalf and to suggest that Hitler was a Zionist, based, one is led to understand, on a book by a self-hating Jew, Lenni Brenner, which implies that the Jews collaborated with the Nazis to get to Palestine in 1932. According to Ken, Hitler was not intending to harm the Jews, just to deport them until “he went mad and ended up killing them”. So you see, Mein Kampf was the work of a philo-Semite. And Eva Braun made kneidlach and planted trees in Tel Aviv.

Ken refused to apologise. His repeated defence was to quote, out of context,  Netanyahu’s remark that Hitler wanted expulsion not extinction. (Hitler was indeed influenced by the apparent indifference to the fate of the Jews before 1939: 32 nations, including the US and UK, refused to take in Jewish refugees.)

Then, in a Swiftian turnabout, union leaders declared it was all down to “disgruntled Blairites plotting Corbyn’s downfall, who engineered this whole debate”. I wonder which DB forced Naz Shah to write that racist blog in the first place?

More recently still, when the Hezbollah commander Mustafa Badreddine was killed, the Israelis were regarded as the immediate culprits, until Sunni jihadists claimed the murder for themselves. It reminded me of a debate on Burmese oppression where John Pilger preceded me on a platform to declare that Israel was responsible for the Generals’ 40-year junta. If there’s a blame vacuum to fill, look no further.

Here’s a fresh conspiracy theory, for those who need such things: what if Livingstone started the whole mishagas on purpose to galvanise the anti-Semitic extremists into voting — and voting his way? Some sacrifice. He gets to potter around his newt pond for nine months until Corbyn quietly brings him back into the arena.

The fact is that nobody cares about the Jewish vote. We are 240,000 people in Britain. The more anti-Semitic Labour’s private agenda is, the more votes they get from those millions who are programmed to hate and fear us. Corbyn and Sadiq Khan and Livingstone have embraced and entertained those who incite the murder of Jews and the destruction of the Jewish state. Corbyn knew the provocateurs, extremists and infiltrators in his party but prevaricated in warning themto stop their racist behaviour and in denying them platforms.

Meanwhile, on Sunday morning TV, the most hate-filled studio “discussion” took place between Israel bashers and defenders, hand-picked, it would seem, by Katie Hopkins. Lunatic, petrifying, anti-Semites — the worst being self-hating Jews who prefaced each remark with “I’m Jewish myself, but . . .”.  Shame on the researchers. It made me feel sick all day.

The Palestinian cause is as important a cause as the occupation of Tibet, Chechnya, Crimea, Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus. I won’t go on because they will accuse me, as they always do, of “what-about-ism” and never, never give me an answer as to why they don’t give a flying fart about the “right to return” of any of these other oppressed peoples. So, as I said, I did not respond. I am too tired. I am 4,000  years too tired.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Mark1957
August 26th, 2016
9:08 AM
Naz Shah did not suggest that all jews be transported to the U.S. She foolishly retweeted a graphic by a jewish academic who merely said that if Israel had been set up on the North American continent much of today's terrorism would never have happened. Agree with him or not, that is hardly anti-semetic. Where she was foolish was in using the graphic in a sarcastic manner and not realising the likely spin on that. There is no denying that many on the left are obsessed with Palestine and Israel, some are overly aggressive and some, it has to be said, will be anti-semetic, that does not mean to say that they all are. Even so, the majority, who I'm sure are honourable people, must regulate their own language and behaviour better if they are to avoid the same furore again in the future.

robert quinn
June 11th, 2016
11:06 AM
Well, if professor Timothy Snyder is to be believed ('Bloodlands' and the recent 'Black Earth'), the Final Solution is aptly named. It wasn't the Original Solution. The Nazis did want a 'judenfrei' Reich. They also believed Jews could be compelled or persuaded to move elsewhere, be it Palestine, Poland, even Madagascar at one point (once Britain saw how the wind was blowing and permitted a Jew-laden armada to safely sail to German-acquired territory). This was the great dilemma Heydrich and Himmler faced as the Nazis gobbled up lebensraum to the east and west. No matter what they did, they ended up with more Jews, not fewer, especially after carving up Poland (in league with the bolshies in Moscow, not that such gets much attention). Warsaw was the motherlode of European Jewry. So when the war against the Soviets turned south, the Nazis changed wars, slaughtering Jews proving a more successful venture.

Observer of the Scene
June 2nd, 2016
8:06 AM
The Labour party also has a problem with prejudice against the white working-class. And that prejudice has led to horrors like Rotherham, not to mention many years of rapes, assaults and robberies in white working-class areas of British cities. The Jewish community has not so far suffered much by comparison.

Ewan Maclean
June 1st, 2016
11:06 AM
"Corbyn, Sadiq Khan and Livingstone have embraced those who incite the murder of Jews" This may not be the columnists own words. Just as well - it has the appearance of hypocrisy. Anyone who supports the Israeli government and its more vocal constituencies embraces those who incite the murder of Palestinian Arabs. Surely this is not the most helpful way to frame things?

lindsay hall
June 1st, 2016
11:06 AM
A curious tradition has grown up. - When they come to retire, the head of Mossad and of Shin Bet and the IDF chief of staff come out and say what they have presumably long thought, that Israel should finally negotiate in good faith with the Palestinians, including Hamas. Embracing those who incite the murder of Jews?

vera lustig
May 31st, 2016
5:05 PM
Superb piece, Maureen. You can't win, can you, when you're accused of "what-about-ism" the moment you mention other displaced and oppressed peoples. You'd think that, when it came to human rights violations, Israel was the only show in town. Where, for example, are the voices protesting about the fact that UK-sourced weapons are killing and maiming civilians in Yemen? Yes indeed, who could replace George Galloway as the MP for Bradford West? I had high hopes for Naz Shah when she toppled Gorgeous George last year: how naive of me. There are, sadly, a lot of self-hating Jews out there. Of course we should not blindly support Israel, even when it's guilty of abuses, but, when defending the rights of Palestinians, you have to be very careful about who you get into bed with. Why not help fundraise for the excellent New Israel Fund, which has an active branch in the UK and which is an umbrella organisation supporting NGOs that campaign for justice and equality for all in Israel?

Pastor Ed
May 30th, 2016
9:05 PM
Yes, Tired, understandably. The 500 million Evangelical Christians in the world (see Wikipedia) will stand on either side of the Jewish people and defend. This time we say: NEVER AGAIN ! NEVER

In2minds
May 30th, 2016
6:05 PM
Well done Maureen Lipman for giving the new Mayor of London and Brexit a mention. Sadiq Khan is on a roll at the moment, even David Cameron can't spot the problems to come from the election of Khan and has teamed up with his new best friend to promote Remain. It will end in tears on both counts.

AnonymousIn2minds
May 30th, 2016
6:05 PM
Well done Maureen Lipman for giving the new Mayor of London and Brexit a mention. Sadiq Khan is on a roll at the moment, even David Cameron can't spot the problems to come from the election of Khan and has teamed up with his new best friend to promote Remain. It will end in tears on both counts.

SARAH ADLER
May 30th, 2016
3:05 PM
pity that there was a need for such a piece in the first place. With the BBC unable to be impartial we need more articles like this.Never thought that the UK would be taking up the anti semitic literature of 1930s Germany.Maybe the arrival of other immigrant people has something to do with it?

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.