You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > The Loss Of Faith Made Music Mute
 
Even in opera, a seemingly secular arena, Christianity commonly frames the moral dilemmas of the characters on stage. Mozart's Don Giovanni is dragged off to Hell, Verdi's Leonora takes refuge in a monastery, and Janáček's Jenůfa is just one of the many characters from the operatic repertoire who offers up a Christian prayer in a moment of great despair and need. This isn't merely because the Church held the purse-strings, as some have argued, but because there is a profound and inseparable relationship between music and Christianity; in fact, I would go as far so to argue that there is a sense in which Western music is Christian. The very scales (originally church modes) and harmonies which musicians of any ilk take as a given were forged in the cathedrals and churches of the medieval world. Through a gradual process of setting liturgical texts to music, sonorities such as the dominant-seventh chord were discovered, which then became the basic material of all classical and popular music. Something of the wisdom of the Gospels and the Psalms shines out of the harmonies of Western music—which is that crucial balance between judgment and compassion—and this is why, even on the operatic stage, a Christian moral logic so naturally and fittingly flows forth from the voices of the characters and the machinations of their plots.

Two operas in particular strongly support this line of reasoning, both of which place the suffering of Christ on the cross as a central image around which their respective stories revolve: The Rape of Lucretia by Britten, in which a narrative chorus "view these human passions, and these years/through eyes which once have wept with Christ's own tears", and Wagner's last opera, Parsifal, with its profound insights into the relationship between religious communities and sexual desire. Both operas acknowledge the debt which music owes to Christianity by bringing it back into the realm of secular music-making, and the consequence in the instrumentation of both scores is a remarkable glowing luminosity.

To gain a proper and complete understanding of what we call "classical" music is to appreciate that it was all written within the context of societies which were predominantly Christian in nature, and where celebrations of traditional national attributes were not seen as old-fashioned or backward-looking as they often are today. This all changed, however, in the 1960s, with the old moral authority of Christianity and nationalism brought into question by two World Wars which had slain "half the seed of Europe one by one", and the dawning of the sexual revolution. Liberated from the traditional restraints of Christian society, not least because of the oral contraceptive pill which spread rapidly throughout the world during the early 1960s, there was a sudden seismic shift in young people's behaviour and attitude towards sex, and one of its many consequences was the beginning of an era of "popular" music which gave expression to the new feelings which they could now experience and communicate publicly without shame or censure.

Let's be honest with ourselves: except for a few tangents here and there, the 1960s, 70s, 80s and 90s were overwhelmingly the decades of popular music. If you ask anyone their choice favourites from the 60s and 70s, only a tiny fraction will say Boulez and Stockhausen—and even they are just kidding themselves. Classical music did not enter a fantastic new period of experimentation and innovation in the 1960s. It died. What really took place was a repositioning of the psychological focus of music from the mature feelings of reflective adults to the more impatient and direct feelings of the young. With its "oohs" and its "aahs", its "come-ons" and its "get-downs", its "rock me" this and its "baby" that, the three-     minute pop song homes in on the cheap thrills of recreational sex. Popular music is primarily about the highs and lows of the casual relationship. Different popular songs capture the feelings of different stages along its rise and fall: the yearning for it to begin ("Love me do"), the exuberance and satisfaction of being in the relationship ("I feel fine"), the little jealousies involved within the relationship ("Tell me why") and the angst of the breakup ("I'll cry instead")—to name but a few early Beatles songs.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Derrick Norman
March 2nd, 2015
6:03 PM
How could you leave out the tunefull music of John Rutter? ost of it "faith" inspired.

Callum Hackett
March 2nd, 2015
4:03 PM
It doesn't surprise me any longer that published criticisms of contemporary music are written by people who are wilfully ignorant of the cultural history of the twentieth century, but it still frustrates me. One can tell from the outset that the essential premise of this article is nonsense by the fact that the first composer's name to pop up is 'Verdi'. Whatever the subjects of Verdi's music, Verdi was an atheist, and that this could at least in theory be defended but is not even mentioned shows that the writer does not seriously engage with his theme. One also needn't even bother to follow the deeply biased line of argument to know in advance that it must be false: IF it were the case that classical music has been supplanted because of a severing of its Christian roots, then surely whatever popular medium has replaced it will be a medium that maintains that essential mythology. Look to the kinds of music that has replaced classical in the public consciousness and show me where Jesus is in that miasma of commercial dross. Then, I'm afraid, we have to out the author as a fabricator; a liar; a fraud. He claims, with no substantiation, that conservatoires and music departments don't teach standard harmony and counterpoint any more. On what basis? Why, no basis at all because it's made up! As a recent university student (2013) with ties to classical music (I was an English student but I conducted the nearest orchestra), I know that music curricula still place heavy emphasis on common practice techniques. I also know, as the partner of a musicologist and composer, that knowledge of such things is essential even to the most avant-garde of today's composers. Claims to the contrary are utterly without foundation. Don't even take my word for it - just do the basic research, apparently beyond this article, of looking up a random university or conservatoire prospectus and you will see these foundational aspects of composition as core components. This is specious nonsense dreamt up by a conspiracy theorist living in an imagined world that he supposes must be set against him because he can't quite understand why his tastes have never matured since an adolescent love of sentimental Romanticism. You may do better buying film soundtracks than pursuing art. I would also counter that, as a regular concert-goer and listener of contemporary music, the likes of the venues I attend - whether a small chapel or the Royal Festival Hall - are always packed and always delighted with the programmes, be it Birtwistle, Dutilleux, Ligeti, or some up-and-coming youngsters yet to embed their name in the industry (just to mention composers I have heard from the past few months). Once again, these complaints come from people who do not even attend the institutions they disparage and who therefore have no grounding whatsoever for their laments. If, article reader, you do actually care about your cultural heritage and you want to learn about the genuine history of music, even if you may disapprove of certain styles, then instead of submitting yourself to this effortlessly faked hysteria, read Alex Ross's 'The Rest is Noise'.

The Sanity Inspector
March 2nd, 2015
4:03 PM
As has been observed, time puts a stop to all things, and this is commonly mistaken for tragedy. Our civilization is unlikely to ever top the achievements of 18th century classical or 19th century romantic music--but we don't need to. We still have these mighty works. Just as we still have Chartres and Notre Dame, even though we're right out of the habit of cathedral building. As for modernism, the most withering dismissal I ever read was this: "Ives, Vivaldi, Schoenberg, Glass--no matter how much you hate them, they are not "bad" composers. A "bad" composer is the associate professor at South Succotash State who cranks out imitation Hindemith every couple years with a title like "Directions" or "Vortex." It gets played by the student orchestra and is promptly and appropriately forgotten." --Walter C. Koehler

The Sanity Inspector
March 2nd, 2015
4:03 PM
As has been observed, time puts a stop to everything, and this is often mistaken for tragedy. Eighteenth Century classical and 19th Century romantic music are the twin pinnacles of Western music. We are never going to top them, or extend them, using the principles and tools they used. We are used to this in other forms of art. We are right out of the habit of building cathedrals, yet our appreciation of the great Gothic edifices is undiminished. It will be so with music as well. As for modernism, the most withering assessment I ever read was this: "Ives, Vivaldi, Schoenberg, Glass--no matter how much you hate them, they are not "bad" composers. A "bad" composer is the associate professor at South Succotash State who cranks out imitation Hindemith every couple years with a title like "Directions" or "Vortex." It gets played by the student orchestra and is promptly and appropriately forgotten." --Walter C. Koehler

Anonymous
March 2nd, 2015
3:03 PM
Underlying all this is the growing western view of religion as harmful and spirituality as for the weak minded and un-scientific. So I blame the downfall on Darwin. He has become god, making man the equal of dogs, making beauty an accident, making morality laughable, making transcendence meaningless, making the eternal a farce. I'm not debating Darwinism rather am speaking of it's consequences. The great themes of nationalism, Christianity, and spirituality are meaningless on the foundation of materialistic naturalism. Eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die (ie YOLO)(pop music's arch-theme?) It's the inescapable consequence of this worldview, fed to generations now as the unable-to-be-challenged truth. It provides meaninglessness as a purpose. Besides, popular music always changes and in 100 years many will be pining for our current pop music of the good old days.

Taeho Paik
March 2nd, 2015
12:03 PM
What nonsense! The problem is how music itself and its purpose is truly misunderstood and people go to schools to learn it! Classical musicians are highly capable technically but in the academies they learn nothing about keeping time and creating a groove. So one falls asleep while listening unless one is looking out for specific musical qualities in the composition. In short great music is played in a boring way. Loss of faith is another matter but only blues musicians go to the crossroads to ask the Lord or the Devil for help.

John Borstlap
March 2nd, 2015
11:03 AM
This article confuses two things: Christianity with spirituality, and entertainment with art music. It was not Christianity perse that inspired classical composers but spirituality, i.e. the faith (however vague) in the existence of a spiritual realm and hence, in ethical values. None of the mentioned classical composers were strong adherents of whatever church. Religion is merely a channel for the inner experience of the spiritual, whatever it may be. Then, although the article rightly observes the sudden increasing dominance, in society, of pop music and youth culture since the sixties, this happened entirely in the territory of entertainment, it had and has nothing to do with art music. For the rest, the article rightly touches a couple of unfortunate but very true points. But nowadays there are composers of great talent who introduce exactly the element that had become missing within the realm of art music, of which I want to mention: Nicolas Bacri and Richard Dubugnon in France, and David Matthews in England, who manage to achieve recognition and success within the very context that cultivates the classical composers. They had and have to battle against the grave suspicion at orchestras and concert promotors against contemporary music, but succeeded to overcome these barriers. It is a new trend that wants to reconnect with the earlier 20C as mentioned in the article, comparable with the resurgence of figurative painting - both movements still strongly ignored and taboo'd by the modernist establishment (who want to keep the decreasing money flow into their direction). Recommended: 'The Classical Revolution', Scarecrow Press 2013, which explores this subject. This book got a very mixed reception, fiercely condemned by some, enthusiastically embraced by others. www.amazon.com/The-Classical-Revolution-Thoughts-Traditionalist/dp/08108...

mr.ed
March 2nd, 2015
10:03 AM
Based on my observation of audiences over the last 40+ years, if it weren't for the high percentage of Jews, there would be no classical music, at least in the west.

Anonymous
March 2nd, 2015
7:03 AM
You are an ass, sir. You made it clear from the beginning that you prefer Michael Jackson to the Proms, so why should anyone listen to anything you have to say? Your analysis, while facile, does have some merit: Yes, there have been changes in the culture which have led to the decline in interest in art music, generally, and this includes Jazz, by the way, which is as rarified for younger audiences as a motet by Guillaume de Machaut. But what you have failed to take into consideration is the extent to which music education has diminished, both in the UK and in the States. As a famous Jazz musician once pointed out, one gets from music what one puts into it. Pop has become the soundtrack for the lives of younger people and it wouldn't matter if a classical composer wrote a good triadic ally based tune or not. There has been a decision made in those places where such decisions have clout that art music and art generally are no longer important. It has little to do with style, and in fact, younger people who listen to what is called classical music much prefer atonal music to "a good tune'. But it is clear that you came into the discussion with an axe to grind, so grind away. It will avail you nothing, as you are about as musically uninformed as the first auditors of Stravinsky's Le Sacre.

Jan Sand
March 2nd, 2015
4:03 AM
Beneath the surface gloss of Christianity the skeletal architecture of human decency and compassion for all living things gives Christianity and any faith a validity that inspires all great emotions, and music, more than many of the other arts captures this inspiration quite well. The secularities of necessity and full desires have always existed within civilization but of these later years the open horrors of unleashed greed and cruelty and total disdain for the values of the basic human being as expressed by the vicious moralities of the corporate-military-financial complex have totally trashed any expectations for the future of mankind or, indeed, life itself on the planet. The death of music is perhaps a symptom of the final vileness of the species and all its possible hopes.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.