You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > The Loss Of Faith Made Music Mute
 
Even in opera, a seemingly secular arena, Christianity commonly frames the moral dilemmas of the characters on stage. Mozart's Don Giovanni is dragged off to Hell, Verdi's Leonora takes refuge in a monastery, and Janáček's Jenůfa is just one of the many characters from the operatic repertoire who offers up a Christian prayer in a moment of great despair and need. This isn't merely because the Church held the purse-strings, as some have argued, but because there is a profound and inseparable relationship between music and Christianity; in fact, I would go as far so to argue that there is a sense in which Western music is Christian. The very scales (originally church modes) and harmonies which musicians of any ilk take as a given were forged in the cathedrals and churches of the medieval world. Through a gradual process of setting liturgical texts to music, sonorities such as the dominant-seventh chord were discovered, which then became the basic material of all classical and popular music. Something of the wisdom of the Gospels and the Psalms shines out of the harmonies of Western music—which is that crucial balance between judgment and compassion—and this is why, even on the operatic stage, a Christian moral logic so naturally and fittingly flows forth from the voices of the characters and the machinations of their plots.

Two operas in particular strongly support this line of reasoning, both of which place the suffering of Christ on the cross as a central image around which their respective stories revolve: The Rape of Lucretia by Britten, in which a narrative chorus "view these human passions, and these years/through eyes which once have wept with Christ's own tears", and Wagner's last opera, Parsifal, with its profound insights into the relationship between religious communities and sexual desire. Both operas acknowledge the debt which music owes to Christianity by bringing it back into the realm of secular music-making, and the consequence in the instrumentation of both scores is a remarkable glowing luminosity.

To gain a proper and complete understanding of what we call "classical" music is to appreciate that it was all written within the context of societies which were predominantly Christian in nature, and where celebrations of traditional national attributes were not seen as old-fashioned or backward-looking as they often are today. This all changed, however, in the 1960s, with the old moral authority of Christianity and nationalism brought into question by two World Wars which had slain "half the seed of Europe one by one", and the dawning of the sexual revolution. Liberated from the traditional restraints of Christian society, not least because of the oral contraceptive pill which spread rapidly throughout the world during the early 1960s, there was a sudden seismic shift in young people's behaviour and attitude towards sex, and one of its many consequences was the beginning of an era of "popular" music which gave expression to the new feelings which they could now experience and communicate publicly without shame or censure.

Let's be honest with ourselves: except for a few tangents here and there, the 1960s, 70s, 80s and 90s were overwhelmingly the decades of popular music. If you ask anyone their choice favourites from the 60s and 70s, only a tiny fraction will say Boulez and Stockhausen—and even they are just kidding themselves. Classical music did not enter a fantastic new period of experimentation and innovation in the 1960s. It died. What really took place was a repositioning of the psychological focus of music from the mature feelings of reflective adults to the more impatient and direct feelings of the young. With its "oohs" and its "aahs", its "come-ons" and its "get-downs", its "rock me" this and its "baby" that, the three-     minute pop song homes in on the cheap thrills of recreational sex. Popular music is primarily about the highs and lows of the casual relationship. Different popular songs capture the feelings of different stages along its rise and fall: the yearning for it to begin ("Love me do"), the exuberance and satisfaction of being in the relationship ("I feel fine"), the little jealousies involved within the relationship ("Tell me why") and the angst of the breakup ("I'll cry instead")—to name but a few early Beatles songs.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Pete ByrneAnonymous
March 5th, 2015
9:03 PM
The zeitgeist changes and music changes. Classical music has simply become irrelevant in light of the world as it's lived in.

Tedd
March 5th, 2015
4:03 PM
I'm not sure I agree with the conclusion but, as an atheist, I agree completely with the rest of the article. Rather than try to explain these developments away, or mis-characterize the thesis as Christian-good/non-Christian-bad, other atheists ought to spend some time thinking about what will reliably help people see something larger than their own ego at work in their psyche, which is what Christianity (and other forms of spiritualism) can do, at their best. That is what elevates us above the "cheap thrills of recreational sex" and other shallow pursuits. And that is also what, despite its otherwise-extraordinary success, the Godless world has not yet been able to do.

amcdonald
March 5th, 2015
4:03 PM
Is Jeff Butler simply jealous ? How unbecoming and poor form of him. Critics who are not `rational actors` create negative publicity. Nothing in Standpoint has or is being co-opted. "If there`s one thing worse than being talked about it`s not being talked about at all."- Oscar Wilde.

Jeff Butler
March 4th, 2015
7:03 PM
@amcdonald, @Rick Robinson: What makes you think it is acceptable to co-opt this forum to shill your own music, couched in an otherwise utterly irrelevant comments? It's unbecoming, and poor form.

Anonymous
March 4th, 2015
3:03 PM
The title I feel is a bit misleading because while the author does talk about the lack of Christianity (which I disagree with) a good portion of it does talk about the atonality of music that SADLY is in vogue. For me, the decline of classical music is that the music is made for musicians...there isnt a human element anymore that people can connect to. Music is about connection. Such operas like Demandolx which is currently in development seeks to connect audiences again (www.opera-demandolx.com) and others that are trying hard to bring the classical music back to the people. There is a concept: bring the music to the people! Atonality and this John Cageism that is so prevalent today only succeeds with two things: 1. makes the audience feel they dont 'get it' and as such, they tune out, 2. strokes the composers ego for being 'cutting edge' which it really isnt anymore. I dont think it has to do with religion or nationalism. It has to do with creating music that is, in fact, music.

John Porter
March 4th, 2015
12:03 PM
Well, there's one thing clear from this essay, that the author has no interest in anything written in the latter part of the 20th century. There are many, who will put Steve Reich or Arvo Part up against any of those listed as active in 1900, including Mahler or Stravinsky. What is more, many of those composers are fading into oblivion. You're not going to hear much Janacek or Rimsky Korsakov performed today. The bulk of Saint Saens is pretty light weight. It's hard to afford credibility to an author so biased against music based on chronology.

pdq
March 3rd, 2015
9:03 PM
Hm. I was taught that one of the features of _classical_ music was that it _wasn't_ nationalistic; that's part of what made it classical. It's part of what classical means. Nationalism was a move away from the classical ideal.

Serge
March 3rd, 2015
6:03 PM
Interesting analysis, although perhaps over-generalizing. Is not much music even of the classical era under discussion motivated by other passions than nationalism and Christianity? For example: romantic love, the beautiful and sublime in nature, Enlightenment reason, the discoveries of science, the human condition in all its varieties, death (whether of others or in consideration of one's own death), etc. Also, no mention of composers like Arvo Pärt, Glass, etc? What of film composers, who have a tremendous influence? The rising neoclassical music, which fuses classical minimalism with the ambient electronic instrumental movement, which may itself may be considered a continuation of the classical tradition? I am also not convinced that the answer is a return to nationalism and Christianity as sources of inspiration; this seems like a regressive step. Finally, whereas admittedly much popular music focuses on the casual sexual relationship, this is not true of all. Much focus on idealized romantic love, for example, and many other themes. Regardless, thank you for this thought-provoking article.

Butch
March 3rd, 2015
4:03 PM
A much simpler view in my mind is that modern technologies have provided humans with instant access to almost everything in a non stop 24/7 electro-sphere of incessant and mostly irrelevant piping from which there is no escape. No time for absorption of material yet alone reflection, which is really what listening to classical music requires. A 3 minute sound byte is the maximum tolerance level, now lets move on.

Michael B.
March 3rd, 2015
4:03 PM
Yes, let's go back to that wonderful time when religion and the state were completely intertwined. I am sure that everyone is fondly remembering pogroms, the Thirty Years' War, the burning of Jews and heretics at the stake, and the persecution of scientists for stating that the earth revolves around the sun or that the theory of evolution explains many facts about the biology of humans. The interesting thing is that there are plenty of composers still writing religious music (Arvo Pärt and James MacMillan come immediately to mind), but they are doing so out of their own individual creative impulses (yes, and using variations on traditional tonality), rather than acting out of compulsion by the state.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.