You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > The Loss Of Faith Made Music Mute
You can't request more than 20 challenges without solving them. Your previous challenges were flushed.
 
Even in opera, a seemingly secular arena, Christianity commonly frames the moral dilemmas of the characters on stage. Mozart's Don Giovanni is dragged off to Hell, Verdi's Leonora takes refuge in a monastery, and Janáček's Jenůfa is just one of the many characters from the operatic repertoire who offers up a Christian prayer in a moment of great despair and need. This isn't merely because the Church held the purse-strings, as some have argued, but because there is a profound and inseparable relationship between music and Christianity; in fact, I would go as far so to argue that there is a sense in which Western music is Christian. The very scales (originally church modes) and harmonies which musicians of any ilk take as a given were forged in the cathedrals and churches of the medieval world. Through a gradual process of setting liturgical texts to music, sonorities such as the dominant-seventh chord were discovered, which then became the basic material of all classical and popular music. Something of the wisdom of the Gospels and the Psalms shines out of the harmonies of Western music—which is that crucial balance between judgment and compassion—and this is why, even on the operatic stage, a Christian moral logic so naturally and fittingly flows forth from the voices of the characters and the machinations of their plots.

Two operas in particular strongly support this line of reasoning, both of which place the suffering of Christ on the cross as a central image around which their respective stories revolve: The Rape of Lucretia by Britten, in which a narrative chorus "view these human passions, and these years/through eyes which once have wept with Christ's own tears", and Wagner's last opera, Parsifal, with its profound insights into the relationship between religious communities and sexual desire. Both operas acknowledge the debt which music owes to Christianity by bringing it back into the realm of secular music-making, and the consequence in the instrumentation of both scores is a remarkable glowing luminosity.

To gain a proper and complete understanding of what we call "classical" music is to appreciate that it was all written within the context of societies which were predominantly Christian in nature, and where celebrations of traditional national attributes were not seen as old-fashioned or backward-looking as they often are today. This all changed, however, in the 1960s, with the old moral authority of Christianity and nationalism brought into question by two World Wars which had slain "half the seed of Europe one by one", and the dawning of the sexual revolution. Liberated from the traditional restraints of Christian society, not least because of the oral contraceptive pill which spread rapidly throughout the world during the early 1960s, there was a sudden seismic shift in young people's behaviour and attitude towards sex, and one of its many consequences was the beginning of an era of "popular" music which gave expression to the new feelings which they could now experience and communicate publicly without shame or censure.

Let's be honest with ourselves: except for a few tangents here and there, the 1960s, 70s, 80s and 90s were overwhelmingly the decades of popular music. If you ask anyone their choice favourites from the 60s and 70s, only a tiny fraction will say Boulez and Stockhausen—and even they are just kidding themselves. Classical music did not enter a fantastic new period of experimentation and innovation in the 1960s. It died. What really took place was a repositioning of the psychological focus of music from the mature feelings of reflective adults to the more impatient and direct feelings of the young. With its "oohs" and its "aahs", its "come-ons" and its "get-downs", its "rock me" this and its "baby" that, the three-     minute pop song homes in on the cheap thrills of recreational sex. Popular music is primarily about the highs and lows of the casual relationship. Different popular songs capture the feelings of different stages along its rise and fall: the yearning for it to begin ("Love me do"), the exuberance and satisfaction of being in the relationship ("I feel fine"), the little jealousies involved within the relationship ("Tell me why") and the angst of the breakup ("I'll cry instead")—to name but a few early Beatles songs.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
March 3rd, 2015
3:03 PM
So contemporary music isn't 'Christian' enough? Seems like a fairly superficial treatment of an otherwise-interesting subject. Methinks the cause of classical music's shift in importance is quite complex, and is related to very many factors and events. So the notion that good tunes equal "Christian" and not-good tunes equal "atheist" is rather laughable. On a pure musical plane, one can only look at what Wagner and the post-Wagner crowd did to exhaust the harmonic possibilities of the twelve-note scale, leaving Schonberg and the rest to ask what could be done after Wagner. Factor in the whole history of the 20th century, including probably the greatest surge of interest in classical art music in western history, a proliferation of orchestras, opera companies, chamber music groups, etc. Add in the whole ability to record EVERYTHING and maintain private collections of these recordings. Add in the rise of popular music. Factor in the globalization of music to encompass musical tastes from around the whole world and not just Europe. Just start with those things. There are many others, but just start with those, and then you'll begin to understand why classical music has come to the marginalized state it occupies in popular culture today. I've come to see this as not necessarily good or bad. Just understandable. Will it resurge? Probably. Like any great art, its values are there to be discovered and uncovered and revealed to a new generation. Will it ever occupy the position it held in, say, the mid-20th century. I rather doubt it, and I say that as someone who grew up in this tradition and practiced the art in various forms over the course of my lifetime. To set up some 'Christian-Non-Christian' polemic seems naive at best and if not simply mistaken, certainly a very limited perspective on a question that probably has a much more complicated answer.

Rick Robinson
March 3rd, 2015
3:03 PM
I agree with much (let's say half) of what you publish here. Without critiquing what I disagree with, let me just say that my own compositions (cuttime.com) attempt to bring an American nationalism to classical music with urban pop and folk styles vaguely familiar to us. This is having a measurable impact on the audiences I play them for. "The genie is out of the bottle", to continue all the cliches. But there IS this chance to reframe the context for largely instrumental music as either spirituality or sexuality. The former is best done in a concert hall, a defacto sanctuary of music, and the latter in club, a sanctuary of secularity. Many of us in the Classical Revolution movement that began in San Francisco in 2006 are working to improve what is already working, albeit on a small scale.

John Evans
March 3rd, 2015
3:03 PM
A lot of the most interesting work by modern composers is hidden in plain sight, as BBC Radio 3's excellent 'Sound of Cinema' series has conclusively demonstrated week by week for a long time now.

Charles
March 3rd, 2015
2:03 PM
We have nationalism and Christianity to thank not only for great music and art but also for the Crusades, the Inquisition, the grisly 17th century religious wars and runaway stake-burnings, the two world wars, slavery, colonialism, the genocide of the Native Americans and the near-genocides of the Armenians and the Jews. So on balance perhaps we are better off without these social forces even though they inspired great art.

Kamathymous
March 3rd, 2015
2:03 PM
Brilliant , I liked the comments by Anonymous.

Anonyclaudiomous
March 3rd, 2015
7:03 AM
Mr. Rudland (et al) may enjoy this. http://youtu.be/Yot1zZAUOZ4

Zak44
March 2nd, 2015
11:03 PM
Interesting then, that so many great works on religious themes were written by composers either atheist or agnostic. Berlioz, Verdi, and Brahms (requiems); Janacek (Mass, The Eternal Gospel); Wagner (Parsifal), Vaughan Williams (Mass, edited The English Hymnal).

Tim Cavanaugh
March 2nd, 2015
10:03 PM
Not sure what Schoenberg is being blamed for here, but if irreligion is (as it seems to be) the author's explanation for the decline of popularity, something doesn't add up. Schoenberg had no choice but to take his religion very seriously, and the equation of religious discipline and musical discipline is at the center of much of his work -- most notably Moses & Aron, which amounts to a dramatic argument for the tonal row as the musical equivalent of God's will revealed through the commandments. It's certainly true that many or most people don't care for how it sounds, but lack of faith does not seem to explain that lack of appeal. As for the loss of nationalism, connection to the supernatural, direct emotional appeal and the other elements the author mourns, you can find them abundantly in the work of Jerry Goldsmith, Bernard Herrmann, John Williams and dozens of other Hollywood composers working in the period covered by this article.

FRANCIS SCHWARTZ
March 2nd, 2015
8:03 PM
Balderdash.

Derrick Norman
March 2nd, 2015
6:03 PM
How could you leave out the tunefull music of John Rutter? ost of it "faith" inspired.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.