You are here:   Communism > Online Only: Heirs to the Left
 

This is oddly prescient. Despite its name, the New Right has nothing to do with neoconservatism, libertarianism or old-fashioned conservatism. Its roots lie in the realisation of fascist intellectuals that a return to power was impossible until the cultural atmosphere had been sufficiently changed. This involved a deep reverse engineering and repackaging of the fascist legacy, most prominently in the French Nouvelle Droite.

Under the lead of Alain de Benoist, the ND allowed fascists to think of themselves as something other than defeated. Instead of resentful losers, they were keepers of the faith during the interregnum: our current society of liberal democracy, cosmopolitanism, mixed economy, and human rights. When these false idols are discredited, the faithful would guide European civilisation back to its rightful path.

Taking this into consideration, left-wing anti-liberalism assumes a new importance. Democratic rightists such as myself may roll our eyes when James Lovelock says fixing global warming requires the "temporary" suspension of democracy, and fan our armpits when Sue Blackmore frets in the Guardian about whom "we" will allow to live and who to die. We can do this because it is tacitly understood that such people are phoneys. Neither Lovelock nor Blackmore have the power to back up their statements, nor the will to get the power, nor the nerve to use it if they did. But what do you make of a statement like this:

Hitler's racism, however, is only one form of racism [...] There are other forms of racism - cultural (asserting that there are high and low cultures), civilisational (dividing people into those civilised and those insufficiently civilised).

This might seem a standard piece of post-modern, left-wing drivel. It is, however, taken from The Fourth Political Theory, by Alexander Dugin, the Russian New Right theorist who believes in a Eurasian empire "from Dublin to Vladivostok", and that the Waffen-SS was "an intellectual oasis in the framework of the National Socialist regime". Though in fairness, Dugin also glorifies Stalinist Russia.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
blah
March 23rd, 2014
12:03 AM
May I add that Faye, once a porn actor, is a well-known alcoholic, and that no one (it seems to me) has heard from him since maybe a decade. Having not read "Archeofuturism", I didn't know about the "mass cloning to replenish white stocks"… thanks for the laugh !

Nick B. Steves
November 6th, 2013
5:11 PM
[T]he crucial argument of the 21st century will not be between Right and Left, but between the democratic Right and the fascist Right. Tho' I cannot see how this is remotely possible, I *DO* hope you're right, err... correct.

Nick B. Steves
November 6th, 2013
5:11 PM
The death of socialism has been like the fall of some rainforest giant, leaving a space for lesser growths. Socialism? DEAD?!!?? I didn't even know it was sick.

Rob
August 29th, 2013
9:08 AM
Enjoyed this, thanks. Mentions political figures and movements I had no idea about - Benoist, Dugin and the New Right. Mention of Shiv Sena brought back a few memories from living in India. I remember reading an article in a newspaper there that was meant as a positive piece about the interest Indians were taking in history – turns out it was to do with a huge spike in sales of Mein Kampf, a book that was spoken of in irony-free terms as being useful for go-getter managerial types. How to win friends and influence people. I found the complete lack of any historical sense among many of the Indians I met shocking, but I don't imagine the UK would fare to well these days, and in any case, history seems to be packaged as another form of conspiracy anyway, mere co-ordinates that reveal the 'deep structures' being manipulated by this or that cabal. I have to admit I grow increasingly confused as to what 'cultural relativism' is. To me, it often seems to be setting up oppositions or stratifications where there doesn't need to be any. Is Shakespeare better than Dan Brown? Saying he is makes you a snob, saying he isn't makes you a moron. If you say you read both you're a cop-out. With books it's harmless enough, it's when this is raised to debates over ethnicity, moral rights, universal values that making a choice becomes more problematic. Though when it comes to fascist and extremist politics, making a choice is precisely what we need to do. For now and perhaps until it is too late, the Left, I'm sorry to say, will go on eating itself and committing its own tragic little pogroms on Guardian reader threads. One issue, at the start of the article you talk about socialism 'discredited by its real practice'. Where do Norway and Sweden fit into that description? Worth mentioning given you talk about Brevik.

anon
August 23rd, 2013
7:08 PM
Guillaume Faye as the most dangerous man in Europe? You must be joking. Or delusional. The New Right is a tiny, insular movement with no popular support or favorable media coverage, inhabited largely by intellectuals who talk but don't act. If all you've got to point to are the isolated actions of a nutter on steroids several years ago then that's a very thin case you're making.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.