You are here:   Features > Bin Laden is Dead — So Why Don’t We Rejoice?
 

Reality, however, has a tendency to bounce back. The commonest mistake and illusion of people throughout history is the illusion of permanence — the mistake of thinking that what is ordinary for you has been the ordinary in the past and will be ordinary in the future. Those who think they live in post-history may be no more prone to this tendency than their ancestors, or any more aware of the fact. But the completeness of the presumption that they are beyond history is the surest signal of all that they are about to re-enter it at some point very soon.

British and European populations have been living under the umbrella of American security for more than a generation. There are people in old age who have never known anything else. Borrowed money has been used to finance a way of life which seems no longer willing to fight for its own survival. We love our rights, we love our comforts and we love ourselves. But we do not love these things enough to believe that anybody who seeks to take them away from us is an enemy to be dealt with in the traditional way. Because there are other people to do that for us. Or were.

States are only able to feel beyond history because there are other states, like Israel and America, who remain in it, who kill our enemies for us and keep us safe because we do not have the inclination, the time or the money to so distract ourselves from our pleasures. When that is the normal way of things to us, we expect the same behaviour of others. And of course we end up — as Britain now so surely has — turning on, and eventually hating, the very people who give us the security for which we will no longer take the responsibility ourselves. 

Within hours of crowds turning out on American streets in jubilation at the news of bin Laden's death we Europeans — and not just the chattering classes — were back to our new favourite game: anti-Americanism. And it turned out that even Barack Obama, the impossibly favoured American President, the man Europeans loved so much they said America would never vote for him — even that man cannot shield America from the hatred those it protects now feel for it.

How backward those American demonstrations seemed to them. How embarrassing. How un-nuanced. And no one, it seemed, across the whole panoply of hand-wringers had time to ponder whether their delicious moral qualms would even be possible had not men far younger than they, drawn from throughout America, risked their lives for years in dusty compounds, pursuing enemies whose existence the people they protected often doubted.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
JC Foreman
September 20th, 2011
10:09 PM
Yes a "post-historical paradise". That is what we currently occupy. Simon Reynolds recently released a new book titled: "Retromania Pop Culture's Addiction to its own past". It covers a similar theme to this from a music perspective, that we have entered a post creative artistic world. All the new music being released or is rehash of earlier music. The big question is whether this is just a European or American phenomenon or an inevitable human destiny and that we are simply ahead on the curve, a post-historical humanity?

manolo
June 12th, 2011
1:06 AM
totally agreed with the ny reader

A Reader from NYC
June 10th, 2011
1:06 PM
If President Obama's self-congratulatory announcement of Bin Laden's death did more to set himself up as a punchline rather than a paladin, the ensuing drunken "frat party" atmosphere that desecrated Ground Zero, where the remains of countless victims are still interred, was - or should have been - an embarrassment to the whole country. As I watched the U.S. news networks get caught up in this festal mood, I wondered whether one brave reporter might dare show a side-by-side shot of the pandemonium at Ground Zero and footage of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza who danced on their rooftops on 9/11. None did. While I make no analogies between the deaths of 3000 innocents and the one tyrant behind their murders, as an American, I would argue that, even if the joy felt by many is perfectly understandable and justified, this cannot and must not be a license to abandon all reason and dignity, particularly when the world is watching. Therefore, while I applaud Mr. Murray's candid analysis of reactions across the pond, the unseemly conduct of the relative few in my own backyard has cast a large shadow on a nation whose global influence continues to diminish and whose position as Leader of the Free World is now more a matter of perception than fact.

Wes Brown
June 4th, 2011
11:06 AM
A sad time. United States forces kill leader of a Islamo-fascist cult engaged in war with the West, and all our 'morally superior' Leftwing friends can do is find even more tenuous and extravagant ways to critique America.

Anonymous
June 2nd, 2011
11:06 AM
"States are only able to feel beyond history because there are other states, like Israel and America, who remain in it, who kill our enemies for us and keep us safe because we do not have the inclination, the time or the money to so distract ourselves from our pleasures." How true. And how shameful for us.

Paul
June 1st, 2011
7:06 PM
Excellent article Douglas, as too was your performance on Question Time. If its any consolation, I for one was very happy to hear that Osama had been killed. Well done America! Jim, I have to agree with John. You comment is dreary and ill-informed.

John
May 30th, 2011
5:05 PM
Another top article Douglas keep up the good work. As for the below comment by Jim Graham, why don't you have some respect instead of labelling someones writing as ''bollocks.'' Nobody is asking you to agree with it, showing respect is the least you can do, but of course you're so up your own backside thinking you know it all yourself you haven't even got the decency to do that. You just sound like a miserable old fart quite frankly! Haha

Jim Graham
May 27th, 2011
11:05 PM
Nearly ten years after publication, Douglas Murray comes up with a badly written rehash of Robert Kagan’s Paradise and Power (hardly the masterpiece that Murray makes out). Kagan’s thesis is well written, forcefully argued but mostly his analysis is skewed and his conclusions are wrong. Murray attempts an analysis of supposed European attitudes to the death of Bin Laden and then interpret it within Kagan’s framework. Bad writing is the sure sign of confused and lazy thinking. Instead of sticking to his proposal and marshalling appropriate evidence he uses the death of Bin laden to turn in and out of so many blind alleys and one way streets. The most egregious example being, “as physically obese and morally decadent as it is possible to be” when talking about the results of European welfare arrangements. Now I’ve travelled a bit, both in Europe and the USA, and I must say it is only in the USA that obesity is noticeable as an everyday fact. When I hear the phrase “Morally decadent as it is possible to be”, I think of Caligula, The Hellfire Club, Sodom and Gomorrah not welfare queens living in council estates. This is simply bollocks and the whole article is littered with this stuff. As it turns out his whole piece is based on a couple of liberal lawyers asserting a preference for a courtroom, some beards protesting outside the American embassy, a Guardian editorial, some handwringing from the Archbishop of Canterbury and, most comically, Murray’s own appearance on question time. When I pay £4.50 for my copy of Standpoint I expect better than lacklustre and thoughtless prose and a weak rehash of an old book.

Universalgeni
May 26th, 2011
6:05 PM
Bin Ladens death was suiside by soldier. He could have surendered...

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.