You are here:   Eastern Europe > A Hungarian Democrat Takes on the Old Guard
 


Orator '89: Viktor Orbán commemorating Hungary's National Day on March 15

Hungary has always felt a little forgotten in the European mind, but its recent prominence in the world's media is something it could have done without. Probably no one would even be aware of Hungary holding the EU presidency, but for the hysteria that has erupted around its media law which also came into force in January, as Hungary assumed the presidency.

I'm not going to defend the media law but I am going to reflect on the hypocrisy, double standards and ignorance of those who have so shrilly attacked it and Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. Outside Hungary, attacks on the media law in the EU have come principally from the Left, but they have gained bandwagon momentum in political circles and the press, and even the illegal download website The Pirate Bay, based in Sweden, shut down its services for 24 hours to protest against the law.

For one democracy to interfere in the internal affairs of another requires a great deal of justification. The media law may indeed be badly thought-out or poorly drafted, but poorly drafted and badly thought-out legislation passes through democratic legislative bodies every day. 

I haven't read the full text of the law (it's far too long), but then neither have its critics. Most of the condemnations came long before the law was translated into English, so critics like Luxembourg's Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn and the New York Times who incorrectly claimed that Angela Merkel had "spoken out strongly" against the law are lining up with the Ayatollah Khomeini in attacking something they haven't read (unless they've been taking evening classes in Hungarian).

If someone in Hungary who didn't speak English, who'd never been to Britain, who had made no study of its culture or history were to start fulminating about the state control of the media in the UK (the sinister Ofcom scouring television channels for "offensive" material at the state's behest), we'd laugh or feel sorrow at such patent lunacy. Yet that's precisely the sort of absurd and uninformed criticism that Orbán and his party Fidesz have faced.

Every country has regulation of the media and there is nothing, absolutely nothing, contained in Hungary's media law that isn't found in other EU countries or the US. Lord Annan's sparkling line that the authorities should "censure but not censor" is the ideal a democracy should work towards, but how do you achieve that? Even in Britain with a long tradition of  unfettered news and opinion, we still have arguments about exactly where lines should be drawn (and who should be drawing them).

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
chili
April 5th, 2011
5:04 PM
"In a famous zoological appraisal of Hungarian politics, the economist (and former communist) László Lengyel wrote: "The tiger can't help being born the way it is, living off meat and not green leaves. Viktor Orbán has a tiger's nature. A soft tread. He circles his victim. He plays with it. Mercilessly kills it. There are those who don't like mercilessness. That's a matter of taste." This tiger analogy was completely missing from Fischer's article reviewed in "Magyar Nemzet", the party newpaper of Fidesz today. You can assume why. This fact also depicts the manipulative nature of Viktor Orban and his party that helped him to this election victory (not unheard of, however). In the past 12 years Mr. Orban made a tribal battlefield of the Hungarian political life: by magnifying and spinning every step the socialists and liberals were doing. "Pete"'s comments are true to life absolutely, while Mr. Fischer, the author is grossly blindsided by Orban's manipulations. Just ask the PM, how many of the founding 37 memebers of Fidesz are in government positions? None. He got rid of every one of his original friends, however cherishes the friendship of Zsolt Bayer, a journalist who started at Nepszabadsag, but now is a leading voice on the far right, using disgusting language that your papar wouldn'condone about Jewish artists like A. Schiff and Gy. Konrad . Orban is skillful enough not to be caught making these remarks himself, but his silence speaks loud. I've never heard about your paper, but I don't think you have done a good job checking the whole picture that Mr. Fisher chooses to paint.

Nick T.
April 4th, 2011
5:04 PM
As a foreigner living in Hungary, I'd say a big part of the Western press has gone beserk about Hungary and Orbán and they didn't deserve it. Very good and truthful article, well done!

Lee Goddard
April 4th, 2011
7:04 AM
What a refreshing piece of writing - depth, legibility, research, honesty. A credit to the publication. Thank you. Lee, an Englishman in Hungary

Pete, Budapest, Hungary
April 3rd, 2011
5:04 PM
I could have saved you all those trips, Anonymous, you only had to ask. You could have voted at any one of Hungary's foreign diplomatic representations. Feeling silly?

Pete, Budapest, Hungary
April 3rd, 2011
5:04 PM
Well done, Sue, you're correct. I apologize. Anything else? So, in the Kádár era Schmitt was only the deputy of the National Sports and Recreation Council, which brought with it rank and privileges equal to that of a Deputy Secretary of State. I am sure he got it n appreciation of his principled stand against communism. The ambassadorship in Madrid, however, was in a period that included the Socialist government in Hungary during the early nineties. If you read the highly esteemed contributors below, the MSZP is nothing but the communist party in drag. I wonder what Mr President was doing cosying up to them? Do you also wonder? Our Paul also offered himself to the MSZP as a potential candidate for Parliament, or anything else available. Do you wonder why he did that? He is a real principled fellow, our Mr Schmitt. Remember what I said below - quack, quack, quack.

new generation
April 3rd, 2011
9:04 AM
It happened in 1992 that it had became obvious that the radical anticommnist (later: liberal) party (szdsz) politically merged with the post communists (maszop) and formed the "Democratic Charta" against the ruining civil democratic party. Orban was invited in this left-wing movement but he figured out the real objectives of this merging was to lead the country out off the civil modell road and ensure the survival of the post communists way. And Orban refused. From this time on he has been persecuted by the post commie-liberal parties and its political-economic hinterland, press. This is the short story why Orban is (IN THE SAME TIME!): fashist, Kadarist, gipsy, mother-killer and so on. Orban must be the evil!!!! And today, after an 18 year war against Orban, the commies and libshies are sitting in the jail because they abused the power, commited incredible economic crimes. And this shame-gang wants now the believe the whole world that they tell the truth about Hngary! Big joke! Better said: Big Crime again!!!

Sue
April 1st, 2011
10:04 PM
Pete, you say "please, do note, everyone - not a single one of my (yes) FACTS is disputed." Actually they are.. Schmitt was NOT an ambassador in the communist era! So bad luck!

Anonymous
April 1st, 2011
7:04 PM
As a Hungarian living in the UK since more than 5 years (but always travelling back to vote for Fidesz...) I can only congratulate, this is the best summary of Hungarian politics I have ever seen in the English press, way better than the utterly biased stupid commentaries of the Guardian...

Pete, Budapest, Hungary
March 31st, 2011
3:03 AM
My heartfelt thanks to both Silvano and newjankie. They provide perfect, if somewhat repulsive illustrations of exactly what I am talking about. Play the man, not the ball. Denigrate, libel, tell lies, but whatever you do, do not get involved with discussing specifics. If all else fails, call those of a different opinion, or insight communists. In case that is not enough, throw in some 'quotes', which the target of denigration has never said and hope everyone else is stupid enough to fall for this tactic of lies. That, one and all, is exactly what communists did in the 50s and 60s. And, please, do note, everyone - not a single one of my (yes) FACTS is disputed. Why? Because they actually are facts. As for Silvano's painstaking effort, there is generally no problem with amendments being moved in a normal parliamentary situation to a constitutional proposal, or even 40 of them. What is unusual in this instance is, that the new concoction - which is now under harsh criticism by the Venice Committee, too - was moved and presented in ceremonial circumstances by the governing Fidesz as the perfect constitution for Hungary. Since that has happened, the very same governing Fidesz has moved 40 amendments to its own perfect (we know it is perfect, because Orbán and his cohorts have been saying so nonstop) legislation...still counting. That is not normal legislative procedure and that is a FACT, even if it upsets the likes of newsjankie. It is also a fact, that Fidesz stubbornly refuses to put the final version of whatever it comes up with to the people of Hungary in a referendum. One suspects, and it is only a suspicion, with very good reason. For all comers, debate about the welfare of Hungary and its people involves a little more than trying to tar with a communist brush anyone not in 100% step with the regime. Bit stupid, actually, more than a decade into the 21st century. But, if we are "communists suffering from verbal diarrhoea", then by God, there's an awful lot of us, with the latest public opinion polls showing that even a majority of Fidesz voters do not understand what their regime is doing on the constitutional front. As Lord Acton so perceptively stated in the 19th century, ""Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely." In closing, I do not dispute even for a moment, that newsjankie has, as he claims, suffered a "cerebral meltdown". I do wish him a speedy recovery, if its not too late for that.

newsjankie
March 29th, 2011
5:03 PM
Pete form Budapest is an excellent example of the old communist/socialist demagogue orators, someone who is suffering from verbal diarrhoea, uses emotionally charged words but says nothing, and lacks the basic respect for anyone else but his cohorts (comrades would be to nice a word to use here). His contributions read like a Nepszabadsag editorial and sound like 1960s keynote speech at a Communist Party rally in a factory. Although he is constantly referring to ‘FACTS’ (he loves to use the capitals for this), his writings are entirely void of any fact and/or factuality. Try it for yourself: after you finished reading his writings, if you ask yourself ‘What (facts) did I actually learn about the Hungarian political situation?’, the only thing you can think of is emotions, and no facts. The only things he manages to spew are hate-filled accusation, undocumented innuendos and ‘you-have-to-read-between-the-lines’ sign language. This strategy (in the absence of facts) goes something like this: raise suspicion (‘we can never know’, ‘he/she might do real bad things in the future’, ‘deep down we just know that they are bad’ etc.), smear and generate hatred (‘we all know what they really are’, they need to be investigated’, ‘they are our enemies’, and destroy your opponents. This can be done without a single fact. And this is their concept of democracy. Pete, we had enough of this garbage for 60 years, this is getting to be bloody tiring! Another excellent communist rhetorical and political tool is to accuse your opponents with the things you are ‘made of’. It is surprising how effective it can be, especially if it is used by a political apparatus who practiced it for 60 years. This is what Pete does, this is what Gyurcsany did and does, and this is what Kadar (and all the rest like them) did and do. Pete, are you perhaps Gyurcsany’s speech writer? I would like to provide only one example. Gyurcsany, after his famous public admission that he and his government have lied ‘day and night’ to win the elections, he not only stayed in power, but he painted himself as ‘hero’ as a virtuous man, and since then he and his cohorts are trying to prove that it is not them, but everyone else is a liar. This is where a normal person suffers a cerebral meltdown. In no democratic country could have a prime minister survived longer than writing his resignation letter, except in Hungary.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.