You are here:   Eastern Europe > A Hungarian Democrat Takes on the Old Guard
 


Orator '89: Viktor Orbán commemorating Hungary's National Day on March 15

Hungary has always felt a little forgotten in the European mind, but its recent prominence in the world's media is something it could have done without. Probably no one would even be aware of Hungary holding the EU presidency, but for the hysteria that has erupted around its media law which also came into force in January, as Hungary assumed the presidency.

I'm not going to defend the media law but I am going to reflect on the hypocrisy, double standards and ignorance of those who have so shrilly attacked it and Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. Outside Hungary, attacks on the media law in the EU have come principally from the Left, but they have gained bandwagon momentum in political circles and the press, and even the illegal download website The Pirate Bay, based in Sweden, shut down its services for 24 hours to protest against the law.

For one democracy to interfere in the internal affairs of another requires a great deal of justification. The media law may indeed be badly thought-out or poorly drafted, but poorly drafted and badly thought-out legislation passes through democratic legislative bodies every day. 

I haven't read the full text of the law (it's far too long), but then neither have its critics. Most of the condemnations came long before the law was translated into English, so critics like Luxembourg's Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn and the New York Times who incorrectly claimed that Angela Merkel had "spoken out strongly" against the law are lining up with the Ayatollah Khomeini in attacking something they haven't read (unless they've been taking evening classes in Hungarian).

If someone in Hungary who didn't speak English, who'd never been to Britain, who had made no study of its culture or history were to start fulminating about the state control of the media in the UK (the sinister Ofcom scouring television channels for "offensive" material at the state's behest), we'd laugh or feel sorrow at such patent lunacy. Yet that's precisely the sort of absurd and uninformed criticism that Orbán and his party Fidesz have faced.

Every country has regulation of the media and there is nothing, absolutely nothing, contained in Hungary's media law that isn't found in other EU countries or the US. Lord Annan's sparkling line that the authorities should "censure but not censor" is the ideal a democracy should work towards, but how do you achieve that? Even in Britain with a long tradition of  unfettered news and opinion, we still have arguments about exactly where lines should be drawn (and who should be drawing them).

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Greg
March 29th, 2011
4:03 AM
Tibor Fischer wrote a very funny piece. He has no idea what he is writing about! Actually, he admits it. About the Hungarian media law he writes… “I haven't read the full text of the law (it's far too long)..” Later he comments… “Every country has regulation of the media and there is nothing, absolutely nothing, contained in Hungary's media law that isn't found in other EU countries or the US.” My humble question is, since he hasn’t read it, how does he know that absolutely nothing contained in the Hungary's media law that isn't found in other EU countries? Mr. Fischer piece is a disservice to Mr. Orban, it will be quoted as an infomercial paid by the Fidesz propaganda machine. It was reported that they recently hired a couple of British ad agencies.

Amenemhat the 3rd
March 24th, 2011
8:03 PM
The truth is that the party nowadays called MSZP is equal to the former communist party called MSZMP. No question about it. They changed their name on the 7th of October 1989. Changing name - nothing else happened to them. They were the one-and-only party from 1949 to 1989. The revolution of '56 was beaten by them "with a little help from their friends" - the russians. And a big shame on the European Union using the former communists the same way as the Soviet Union did - to colonialize Hungary with teir help.

An Englishman in Hungary
March 23rd, 2011
9:03 PM
Eric has a good point. Viktor Orbán should distance himself from these remarks of Zsolt Bayer, if he wants to make things completely clear about where he stands on the question of anti-semitism.

A hungarian man
March 23rd, 2011
2:03 AM
Mr Victor László, Oh yes, God save Hungary from the communist criminals, and give more power for Orbán Victor to have a victory for our people- Igen, isten óvja Magyarországot a bűnöző kommunistáktól ás a hazánkat ócsároló hazaárulóktól, mint amilyen ön is.

Ch. White
March 22nd, 2011
10:03 PM
Very good article! This is excatly right, Mr Fisher! Well done. The trouble is not with the media law anyway. Mr Orban, a successful, charismatic and talented Hungarian PM is building a strong Hungary. Which will not sell out the country's interest and best assets to the West, like the previous corrupt and inefficient soclialist - liberal govenment. The attacks against Mr Orban are based on envy, jealousy and total ignorance. Which, only discredit his critics.

MoominTroll
March 20th, 2011
3:03 AM
Thanks for the picture of the young bearded Orban. Nice to see how much he really does look like Ahmadiajad. Makes up a lot for this otherwise unremarkable slab of Fidesz flackery - with all the totalitarian moral certitudes of the breed.

chris
March 14th, 2011
4:03 PM
Re: melytorkuturul You should update your sources... It's none of your business, but Fischer and his (ex)wife have been divorced for over 15 years... So your "deepthroat" is not deep enough...

Eva S. Balogh
March 12th, 2011
5:03 PM
Mr. Fischer's piece is no more than brazen Hungarian government propaganda.

Eric
March 12th, 2011
7:03 AM
Fischer says: "Orban isn't even really right wing....but because politicians and journalists in the West can only think in narrow terms of Left and Right, he is placed in that box." Orban places himself in that box. "Centre right" is Orban's definition of himself, and Fischer knows that very well. Fischer says: "I haven't read the full text of the law (it's far too long), but then neither have its critics." Some of them didn't, true enough, and they deserve ridicule. But Fischer implies that nobody who has criticized the law in English has read it. Untrue. Indeed, Orban recently agreed to some changes to the law because of substantive problems with the text that had been pointed out by EU critics who did read the law, and did understand it. Fischer implies that Orban has been accused of being antisemitic. I cannot recall ever reading that he was, and Fischer's personal anecdote is hardly convincing, but if it has been written anywhere in the press, it should not have been, for it is not true (as Fischer points out). However, there are a legitimate sources of concern, and I will mention just one of several Fischer doesn't mention: The appalling (to me - not to Fischer?) antisemitic comments made in the press by Zsolt Bayer, who was Fidesz's head of press relations (1990-93) and advisor to the first Fidesz govt. from 1998 to 2000. It is this sort of thing, now and in the past, that has led to a feeling that Orban has not distanced himself and his party from antisemites. This is a legitimate concern. I might cite other instances, but suspect Fischer knows them quite well.

melytorkuturul
March 11th, 2011
11:03 PM
Mr Fischer should have declared an interest before he published this piece.His wife was personally asked by Orbán to work for the Fidesz press office, which she did for six years, and after Fidesz gained power, she became a spokesperson for the Foreign Ministry. Now Mr Fischer's political views need not be related to his wife's career, but disclosure would have been appropriate to avoid all appearance of a conflict of interest. P.S. I have never been a member of the communist party or the SzDSz

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.