You are here:   Features > The New Language Of Political Narcissism
 
Moreover the understanding that children are innately serious has been lost. The emphasis is on fun and self-expression. Each child's individuality is nurtured, their feelings meticulously considered. Much is made of teamwork , an important skill in the contemporary workplace. But teamwork is project-based; it is too shallow for loyalty and too flexible and temporary for a sense of collective identity. In secondary schools there is a new emphasis on aspiration: education is "sold" to students as a means to achieve wealth and status. Children are regularly asked to assess their lessons in a peculiar variation of customer feedback. They have become consumers rather than citizens.

As a result patriotism has become difficult to grasp. It requires one to shoulder the blame for wrongs done as well as pride in great achievements, the humiliations as well as the triumphs. It requires commitment, at the heart of which is sacrifice. Contemporary attempts to revive patriotism urge people to select Britishness as one aspect of a composite personal identity, and to view Britain as a huge corporation. Here is a recent attempt by the Prime Minister to market Britain in this way: "We come as a brand—and a powerful brand . . . Team GB. The winning team in world history." The vision revealed in this speech (a particularly grim example of the collapse of public discourse) was expressed in February 2014 at the start of the referendum on Scottish independence. Its debased conception of British identity is in some respects worse than the simple absence of patriotism.

This soulless, ersatz patriotism has arisen in the aftermath of the long withering of religion. Writing 200 years ago, Alexis de Tocqueville observed with characteristic foresight that "as the light of faith gradually dims, men's range of vision grows narrow . . . they seek the immediate gratification of their smallest wishes."

He went on: "In sceptical times, therefore, there is always the danger that men will surrender themselves endlessly to the casual whims of daily desire and that they will abandon entirely anything which requires long-term effort, thus failing to establish anything noble or calm or lasting."

Absence of belief in absolute truth paves the way for subjectivity and relativism, while depriving people of the sense that their innermost self is known and witnessed. This has further contributed to the self-scrutiny, self-reference and self-documentation of contemporary narcissism. (Auden remarked that in the English novels of his time, only Grahame Greene's characters had souls.)

The parish church provided witness to the unfolding of individual lives and a place within which one is known in a public rather than an intimate way. As an intermediate space between the protection of the family and the chaos of strangers, church offers respect and recognition without intrusion.  The urge to expose one's personal life and feelings to strangers arises in part from the loss of spaces such as these.

The new narcissism is taught as an examination technique. Here are some tips from a GCSE revision guide for the English Writing examination:

  • Use Emotive Language to get through to your reader . . . You could tell them some shocking or disturbing facts.
  • Use Facts and Statistics . . . You can make these up if you like, but make sure they sound realistic. They'll make your argument more convincing.
  • Add Generalisations . . . They're a good way to sound forceful and convincing.
  • Include Personal Anecdotes to add interest.
  • Present Opinions as Facts . . . to make your writing persuasive.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Kent
April 26th, 2015
1:04 AM
Most writers come from a middle to upper middle class suburban background. They have experienced no hardship. Even to have gone through National Service someone has to be at least 75 years old. Undertaking a job where mistakes can kill one,such as mining, fishing , construction, armed forces, forestry, farming, oil industry etc, etc forces an individual to face reality, namely death or injury. Most people in the UK can now live a life where a mistake does not cause death or injury; consequently they can live an existence cocooned from reality. If one looks at the toughest life a person can lead in Britain, it is probably in the Special Forces. These people have spent years training their minds and body to endure hardship, and survive when the slightest mistake will lead to death. Consequently, they can overcome extreme challenges. The less human trains their body and mind to endure hardship and overcome extreme challenges, the less they are capable of doing so. These writers are just a manifestation of much of western society, one that is incapable of enduring hardship and overcoming challenges, so it creates a reality with which it can cope.

Rod Thomas
April 16th, 2015
6:04 PM
Solipsism may be defined as the philosophical doctrine that my percepts alone exist. Peter Oborne and Anne Williams’s claim (March) that it lies at the heart of contemporary prose and political discourse reminded me of one of Bertrand Russell’s jokes. In his book Human Knowledge, Russell recounts how he received a letter from a logician who said she was a solipsist and that she was surprised that there were no others. No, solipsism is not at the heart of our political discourse – if only because that discourse presumes other people to exist. Subjective introspection, dippy self-indulgent thinking, egoism, narcissism and personal emotion have largely displaced reasoning in the practice of political speech-making and journalism. But an explanation of that trend needs to consider the influence of other philosophical doctrines. It might start with the doctrine of individualism: that the only thing that matters is the freedom of the individual to gratify their desire. And it might proceed to consider the doctrine that the rationality of our knowledge resides not in our willingness to argue over it, but in our commitment to our beliefs, or to our personal experiences and inherited traditions. For if we think that these give our knowledge an infallible pedigree that is ultimately beyond question, then what is to be gained from arguing over its content? If we subscribe to these kinds of doctrines then our political discourse will necessarily resemble a series of personal declarations, or even worse, it will be characterised by hysteric outbursts and the exchange of personal insults between those who simply disagree with one another.

trialanderr0r
April 11th, 2015
10:04 AM
We've been waiting over a month now for a source for the alleged GCSE revision guide. I'm tempted now to say that Mr Oborne "made it up".... "to make his argument more convincing"... If that is the case, the soft whirring you hear in the background is probably Orwell spinning in his grave...

Nasrudin
March 13th, 2015
11:03 AM
I notice someone else has mentioned this above also but I have to add too and say the GCSE questions look made up "Present Opinions as Facts . . . to make your writing persuasive." I can't find a source for that outside this article. Has anyone a source?

Asmilwho
March 13th, 2015
9:03 AM
@Dave Weeden You're quoting A E Houseman's "A Shropshire Lad", published in *1896* and using it to back up an article describing modern-day writing, as if it suffered from the same modernist faults? Not sure I follow you

Jeff
March 11th, 2015
6:03 PM
A similar notion was expressed, from the American perspective, in Philip Roth's novel The Human Stain. The story, involving themes of race and identity, was a tool used to convey the prevailing message; the media, politics, and citizenry of the United States collectively went mad during the Clinton/Lewinsky controversy (1998), and it's a rabbit hole from which we have never managed to climb out.

trialanderr0r
February 27th, 2015
4:02 PM
Can we have a source for that GSCE revision guide? (so we can all point at it and laugh/cry)

Anonymous
February 27th, 2015
2:02 PM
Having a hard time believing the following: "The new narcissism is taught as an examination technique. Here are some tips from a GCSE revision guide for the English Writing examination: Use Emotive Language to get through to your reader . . . You could tell them some shocking or disturbing facts. Use Facts and Statistics . . . You can make these up if you like, but make sure they sound realistic. They'll make your argument more convincing. Add Generalisations . . . They're a good way to sound forceful and convincing. Include Personal Anecdotes to add interest. Present Opinions as Facts . . . to make your writing persuasive." We were always taught the value of facts and opinion and not to obscure them in writing. Has it changed that much in nine years? Evidence?

Dave Weeden
February 26th, 2015
9:02 PM
"Into my heart an air that kills/From you far country blows./What are those blue-remembered hills?/What shires, what farms are those?" As the authors rightly point out, self-centered ("my heart") claptrap like this may convey emotion quickly, even economically, but only to youth already dead of soul through exposure to advertising and television and, above all, the lack of a good classical education.

Dave Weeden
February 26th, 2015
9:02 PM
It's a bit of a shame that Bernard Levin fitted the description of a celebrity columnist so well, and him writing in the 60s. Ditto Clive James in the 70s.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.