You are here:   Anjem Choudary > Are We Losing The War For The Soul Of Islam?
 

The result is a public "debate" which not only avoids the main issues but skirts even the secondary issues, when it does anything at all. For instance, the public are able to discuss the issue of the veil or the burka on a regular basis. This has been the proxy debate about Islam in most European countries for at least a decade. In September, Britain went through another such round. An 800-pupil state-funded girls' school in Blackburn turned out to have on its list of demands of students not only the wearing of the headscarf in school but the wearing of it at all times outside school. The school is the first of a network of 12 Muslim free schools to open under the Education Secretary's new schools scheme. Others such schools are due to open in East London and Hackney. Meanwhile at another new free school in Derby it recently transpired that even non-Muslim staff were required to wear headscarves. The school has subsequently been closed and then reopened with slightly altered rules.

At the same time that this was going on, the row re-erupted over whether female doctors in the NHS should be allowed to wear full face-coverings. And then there was another entry in the perennial discussion over whether a full face covering (the niqab or burka) should be allowed to be worn in court. For several days the nation's attention was focused on Blackfriars Crown Court in south London where a 22-year-old Muslim woman — on trial for allegedly intimidating a witness — insisted on her right not to have to reveal her face in a court in which there were men. All the main party leaders publicly wrung their hands. Rights were weighed up. The campaign group Liberty weighed in on the side of the defendant's right not to show her face in court. The judge in the case was eventually applauded for his tough and rigorous stance in demanding that the woman remove her full face-covering while giving evidence, but allowing her to retain it while listening to the evidence of others. This was applauded on all sides as a notable victory for British common sense.

For comparatively old hands it is easy to be cynical. One Muslim friend who was telephoned by a national newspaper to comment on the recent round of face-covering stories told them to dig out what he'd told them last time round and churn it out again. In Britain the way in which such "controversial" issues are tackled is always the same. There is a blockage of common sense or assertion of values. This looks like being temporarily relieved as some politician or public figure says something apparently "controversial", after which — the pressure valve having been briefly released — everything dies down again. All the time the underlying stories continue unaddressed.

Last year Mohammed was the second most popular name for newborn boys in England and Wales. In the country as a whole it was narrowly beaten to the top spot by Harry (which received a boost from the popular prince and a member of the pop group One Direction). But the figures also show that Mohammed is now easily the most popular name for baby boys in many areas of the country, including London and the West Midlands.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
SulaymanF
November 3rd, 2013
2:11 AM
"Tell them to put the concerns of the state foremost in the minds of young Muslims, to have a picture of the Queen and say a prayer for the royal family in mosques as it is said in synagogues every Saturday. " That is a highly unorthodox thing, to say the least. Muslims are not Anglicans, and trying to imitate them will only earn you derision.

ibrahim
November 3rd, 2013
1:11 AM
was shocked when i read the start......Sufi Muslim friend. From her I learned, in those pre-9/11 days, about the horrors of the Wahhabis and the Salafis, the Deobandis and the Khomeinists. In other words...i learnt islam from a brelvi with extremists and sectarian views and my perception of islam is based on that. !!

Hegel`s Advocate
October 31st, 2013
3:10 AM
A very thoughtful and informative article. Having just trekked through Zizek`s book `Less Than Nothing- Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism` it looks like revolutionary materialism in art and the social media is the cultural victory emerging. Fans of the Kremlin or Caliphate are provincial ideologists. The liar Putin is number 1 in the Forbes most powerful people in the world list. Nadia from Pussy Riot art group has vanished into the Russian prison system.Her lawyer,family and friends have not been able to contact her. America didn`t do that to Oscar Wilde,Mae West or Duchamp. And the rich Russian artworld maintains the omerta. At number 1 in the ArtReview Power 100 is Qatar multi-millionairess Sheikha Al-Mayassa (her brother is the uber-rich Emir.) She buys works by Rothko,Serra and Hirst. Speculative Unrealism ? To create a cultural shield for Qatar? Or a neurotic defence mechanism against the real modernism (it`s truth,beauty and elan vital) of Pussy Riot art and Femen art?

charles soper
October 30th, 2013
7:10 PM
The best solution is its theological demolition, given the weakness and brittleness of its underpinnings it is both feasible and attainable. We just need an open forum and a peaceable appeal to conscience and integrity. People may hanker for Thor at the cinema, but who takes him seriously these days?

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.