You are here:   Anjem Choudary > Are We Losing The War For The Soul Of Islam?
 

The result is a public "debate" which not only avoids the main issues but skirts even the secondary issues, when it does anything at all. For instance, the public are able to discuss the issue of the veil or the burka on a regular basis. This has been the proxy debate about Islam in most European countries for at least a decade. In September, Britain went through another such round. An 800-pupil state-funded girls' school in Blackburn turned out to have on its list of demands of students not only the wearing of the headscarf in school but the wearing of it at all times outside school. The school is the first of a network of 12 Muslim free schools to open under the Education Secretary's new schools scheme. Others such schools are due to open in East London and Hackney. Meanwhile at another new free school in Derby it recently transpired that even non-Muslim staff were required to wear headscarves. The school has subsequently been closed and then reopened with slightly altered rules.

At the same time that this was going on, the row re-erupted over whether female doctors in the NHS should be allowed to wear full face-coverings. And then there was another entry in the perennial discussion over whether a full face covering (the niqab or burka) should be allowed to be worn in court. For several days the nation's attention was focused on Blackfriars Crown Court in south London where a 22-year-old Muslim woman — on trial for allegedly intimidating a witness — insisted on her right not to have to reveal her face in a court in which there were men. All the main party leaders publicly wrung their hands. Rights were weighed up. The campaign group Liberty weighed in on the side of the defendant's right not to show her face in court. The judge in the case was eventually applauded for his tough and rigorous stance in demanding that the woman remove her full face-covering while giving evidence, but allowing her to retain it while listening to the evidence of others. This was applauded on all sides as a notable victory for British common sense.

For comparatively old hands it is easy to be cynical. One Muslim friend who was telephoned by a national newspaper to comment on the recent round of face-covering stories told them to dig out what he'd told them last time round and churn it out again. In Britain the way in which such "controversial" issues are tackled is always the same. There is a blockage of common sense or assertion of values. This looks like being temporarily relieved as some politician or public figure says something apparently "controversial", after which — the pressure valve having been briefly released — everything dies down again. All the time the underlying stories continue unaddressed.

Last year Mohammed was the second most popular name for newborn boys in England and Wales. In the country as a whole it was narrowly beaten to the top spot by Harry (which received a boost from the popular prince and a member of the pop group One Direction). But the figures also show that Mohammed is now easily the most popular name for baby boys in many areas of the country, including London and the West Midlands.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
AJimnonymous
January 13th, 2015
2:01 PM
Multiculturalism is complete, total and utter nonsense. Islam and the West are two scorpions in a bottle.

Charlie South
January 25th, 2014
1:01 AM
A main aspect is resentment.The World is increasingly being dominated by the ability to develop new technologies and catch up with and use existing ones. India and China have developed little new technology but they have learnt and developed their technological base at an incredible rate. The muslim World is falling being not only the west but also China and India. The software in India is largely developed in Bangalore, which is within the Hindu heartlands. The arabic world, excluding oil exports less than Finland and in one year over 5,000 patents were granted in Israel and only 50 in Iran. If one considers the boundary of knowledge to be flexible then it can expand to hold new discoveries. In 1400 the doors of ijtihad were closed in Islam. one cannot have closed mind,stop deductive reasoning based on observation and measurement and develop new technologies. If one closes the female form in a shroud one cannot produce an athlete or ballerina. If one looks at womens' athletic performances they have greatly improved in the last 70 years. Very few books are translated into arabic yet many are translated into English which enables new ideas to be discovered. The reality is that aggressive Islam is based upon a lack of faith in their abilities .If they had the ability, then Pakistan and Bangladesh would out perform India and China in learning new technologies and catching up with the west. In about 1260, roger Bacon wrote about the difference between Faith and Reason and started the British on the path of empiricism- examination of the facts. In 1258 the Mongols sacked Baghdad, destroyed The House of Wisdom and Islam stopped evolving with regard to science and technology. Both India and China are developing because they have opened their minds.

Anonymous
January 6th, 2014
5:01 PM
Hegel. I would be quite happy to write an article for the magazine. I think you would find it very interesting and informative.

hegel`s advocate
December 9th, 2013
9:12 PM
I actually agree with Anonymous about Islam. Comments here are serious and part of D Murray`s article. So unless Anonymous has an article for publication on the subject (and I don`t) then keep the comments flowing. I`m sure Mr Murray is pleased his article has initiated discussion here.

Anonymous
December 7th, 2013
1:12 AM
What Muslims do is the problem. Notwithstanding how admirably kind and well-meaning and non-violent many may be, ALL Muslims give reverence (knowingly or otherwise) to the memory of a mass murderer, rapist, liar, thief, pedophile, bigamist, sadist warmonger. And to his manual on how to conduct aggressive jihad against the unbelievers. Sorry, the only solution to the uncivil aspects of Islam is the recognition that it is not so much a genuine religion as a hoax scam founded by a vile man for his own selfish aggrandisement. It belongs only in the history books and museums along with Zeus and Jupiter. Fortunately such groups as Council of Ex-Muslims are growing and that is the way forward. In my experience most people who call themselves Muslims are profoundly ignorant of what they think they believe anyway. And actually have Christian vales. So the End is Nigh for this terrible mistake of history.

Anonymous
December 4th, 2013
5:12 PM
Hegel. This article offers nothing but despair, and is unable to articulate a meaningful solution to the problem it purports to identify. Is this really the apex of Murray's thinking in respect of Islam? It lacks scholarly depth, exhibiting no real engagement or understanding of the subject matter, whilst also lacking any evidence of engaging with Islam except through the prism of secondary experience. There are very many critiques to be made of Islam, Islamism and Islamic Fundamentalism, but but it remains notable Standpoint continues to articulate a populist and superficial discourse, as evidenced by the individuals given space in support of this narrative.

hegel`s advocate
November 26th, 2013
2:11 AM
Anonymous is jealous. Who`s paying Anonymous to play total mediocrity ? with Islamist suicide bombers attacking and killing people in the Iranian embassy Douglas Murray`s article is more relevant than ever.

Anonymous
November 24th, 2013
6:11 PM
Oh Douglas, is this really the best that you can produce after '[...] studying and thinking about Islam [...] for half (your) life'? And how much did The Hertog / Simon Fund for Policy Analysis pay for this sloppy mess?

Alfie
November 20th, 2013
12:11 AM
In our equalist society arguments over the "veil" would come into sharper focus if more young males, especially those of the working (or non-working) class, realised they also had the right to wear a veil, or "ski mask" to protect their modesty, or privacy, (or identity) when in public, or in the local off licence etc. Should they be refused service or custom, or be told to remove said item by police officer, would it not be a case for discrimination and a job for the DPP...in a truly equalist society, of course.

Sagar
November 16th, 2013
1:11 AM
The author refers to the migration of Muslims from the 'Indian subcontinent'. Perhaps a fiber split was necessary? Very clearly, there's a huge difference in approach to life and Islam of Muslims of the Indian origin and of Pakistani - for example. There are few names, if any, of the former kind to be found in discussions about Islamic dogmatism. The author would do well to consider this and its reasons in his future analyses.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.