You are here:   An Independence from Europe > Wanted: New Guardians of the Democratic Process
 
An Independence from Europe, because it fielded candidates in all regions, also qualified for party political broadcasts, which featured candidates who were routinely shown on screen above the words "UK Independence MEP candidate". Only the word "party" was missing and even some hardened UKIP supporters were fooled into thinking that they were looking at a UKIP broadcast, especially when they saw a familiar face — Nattrass himself — taking part. Many other candidates standing for the new party were disenfranchised former UKIP members who might also have been familiar to some voters.

Naturally, strong representations were made to the Electoral Commission by UKIP's leadership and many of its supporters, but they got short shrift because the Commission had bizarrely decided that the new party's name was not confusing to the voters. Writing in a standard response to the many complaints it received, an apparatchik with the title "Assistant Advisor Guidance" wrote:

One test is whether in the opinion of the Commission a party name, description or emblem is the same as one that is already on the register; or it is likely to result in voters confusing it with one that is already on the register.

Neither the party name "An Independence from Europe" nor the description "UK Independence Now" was already on the register. Therefore we made the decision that the party name was not likely to cause voters to confuse it with another registered party.

We also considered the test of whether the name and description could result in voters confusing them with names or descriptions that are already registered. We decided that although there are some overlapping words, the party name and description are sufficiently different from those registered by the UK Independence Party (UKIP) to mean that in our opinion voters were not likely to confuse them with the UKIP name and descriptions.

In the fanciful world of the Electoral Commission, voters at the European election would easily distinguish between "An Independence from Europe — UK Independence Now", and the "UK Independence Party" and that there would be no confusion at all.

Yet the election result proved that hundreds of thousands of voters were in fact misled. An Independence from Europe scooped 235,000 votes despite being completely unheard of prior to the election. Scandalously, its vote was sufficiently high in London and the South West region to deny UKIP an extra seat in both cases, providing the country with two Green Party MEPs that it manifestly did not want.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
TEA party
December 1st, 2014
5:12 PM
Interestingly the Electoral Commission has required TEA Party (a registered political party) to change its name because it thinks that TEA (in capitals) actually stands for Taxed Enough Already whereas using the letters only a voter might think it was something to do with a non-alcoholic beverage. No, really! The officers of TEA Party have agreed (under duress) to change the name to Tea Party. Really - I kid you not!

Harryonthehill
October 31st, 2014
6:10 PM
Whilst I am inclined towards UKIP the trouble is they still have too many daft policies such as denying the need for some renewable forms of energy where appropriate and using forms that are likely to be economic in the next 30 to 40 years and the retention of The Welsh Assembly which many people in Wales do not want. Why not ask our MPs to vote on issues that only affect Wales? Hence I plan to vote to vote for Mike Nattrass' party in the hope that they will bring some sense to the debate.

duncanpt
October 29th, 2014
5:10 PM
What would be very telling is if "An Independence from Europe" had now vanished without trace, not long after the EP elections.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.