You are here:   Beethoven > Opera is Not Just Our Most Expensive Noise
 
I was prompted to those thoughts by two new operas by British composers: Julian Anderson's Thebans, revisiting the world of Enescu's Oedipe, and another, as yet unperformed, opera by Oliver Rudland. Anderson's librettist Frank McGuinness reduces Sophocles's Theban trilogy to three acts, presenting a harrowing interpretation of the world's most famous dysfunctional family. He has crafted a meticulous and complex score. Lucid harmony, impeccable orchestration and wonderful singing make this into a memorable evening, the impression intensified by Pierre Audi's blunt and imagistic direction. Clusters of bird-like notes from the orchestra flutter about the characters on the stage, as they confront each other in emphatic dialogue. A dissonant chorus utters warnings and cries of compassion. The listener is left in no doubt that this is a significant event, dealing with deep and barely manageable emotions. But there is something missing. What is that thing? What are those people doing on stage singing their hearts out, if they have yet to discover a tune? Is it too old-fashioned to suggest that, every now and then in opera, there has to be a melody?

One thing that immediately strikes you in the music of Oliver Rudland is that melody is, for him, the sine qua non of the operatic stage. Rudland has asked me to introduce the first of three performances of his new opera at the Royal College of Music's Britten Theatre on July 24. The work is based on William Golding's novel Pincher Martin, which recounts the last thoughts, memories and hopes of a British naval rating, as his drowning body is dashed onto a rocky island in the Atlantic. I was intrigued by Rudland's idea of turning Golding's story into a one-act opera. For Pincher Martin is a work from my teenage years, part of the postwar attempt to make sense of England, to mourn its lost poetry and to find consolation, nonetheless, in the "inner" England that lies dormant in us all. How would a young person of today transcribe this devastating story into music?

Rudland has written two previous operas, including a touching setting of Oscar Wilde's fairytale, The Nightingale and the Rose. These appealing works, with their tuneful vocal line and tonal harmonies, led me to wonder what such a composer would make of Golding's grim fiction. If any scenario demands modernist dissonance and broken vocal lines, it is this one. In the event the score that Rudland put in my hands turned out to be surprisingly modern, with a raw orchestral seascape against which the tonal melodies sound like the breaths snatched by Martin as he fights his losing battle with the waves.

The set makes use of a cinematic backdrop. The foreground revolves quickly from jagged rock to remembered drawing room, while characters from the past appear and disappear in rapid succession. The music interweaves recollection and perception, past and present, remembered trauma and present fear. The ghosts are brought before us by music that is as haunting to the listener as to the drowning sailor on the stage. The heaving ocean in the pit constantly shatters the past, and the shards of memory pierce the dying sailor again and again until there is nothing positive left of him — only anger, regret and fear.

Oliver Rudland's music has melody, rhythm and harmony, and passages of considerable lyric power. Perhaps that explains why it has fallen through the net of official subsidies. The Arts Council, being run by bureaucrats, is obliged to be at the "cutting edge", supporting what is "challenging", "vibrant" and preferably "subversive", in order to show that the bureaucrats are entirely impartial, and therefore not misled into supporting something merely because they like it. On the contrary, it is because they don't like it that a new work will earn their support: that is what the word "challenging" really means. Subsidy or no subsidy, so convinced is Rudland that the path he has chosen is the right one that he has decided to make this opera happen, whatever the cost. He has chosen poverty with opera, against comfort without it. Like others who have succumbed to the operatic urge, he sees opera as a need, not a choice. It may be the most expensive noise known to man, but it is a noise that has to happen.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
amcdonald
July 29th, 2014
4:07 PM
cunningfox totally overestimates himself (starting with his name). pedanticbore would be empirically accurate. He`s now stuck with repeating his `totalitarian` statement forever. And he`ll never have a girlfriend.

cunningfox
July 26th, 2014
8:07 AM
The usual bunch of ignorant comments from the tone-deaf. Get some ears, people. The whole history of pop music (or whatever meaningless term you want to give it) has less musical value than a single bar of Beethoven, Mozart, Wagner or Britten. If you had a musical brain in your collective heads, you'd understand that. Oh, sorry - you probably think a bar is a place where you get drink before the pop concert, so that you can cope with the mindless, simplistic nonsense you're going to have to endure for the next several hours, to justify the hundreds of pounds you've shelled out for it, because it's what everyone else does and you don't want to look silly by not doing what everyone else does. My heart bleeds for you.

amcdonald
July 21st, 2014
4:07 PM
Trevor Bailey is deluded. Scuton`s "point" doesn`t "prove" anything at all. The article is an advert for Rudland and the marketing category `opera`. Nothing wrong with that. What Schopenhauer had to say about music is more truthful. My favourite civilised capitalist academic is Camille Paglia.

Trevor Bailey
July 20th, 2014
11:07 PM
Roger Scruton 'understands' opera in the same many do: certain works are transcendent above & beyond the necessary limits of reason. His critics here have made the standard democratic appeal to Other Tastes dressed up in Continental obscurity & faux rationalism. And good luck to them, for it rather proves his point about envy. So each to his own.

rbb
July 20th, 2014
3:07 AM
"Their work might gain only a few performances, before disappearing into the void like Genoveva and Le roi Arthus, like Enescu's Oedipe, Busoni's Doktor Faust and Pfitzner's Palestrina — distinguished operas that are now all but forgotten." What rock is this person living under? In the last ten years, Enescu's 'Oedip' has grown from one recording to three; Palestrina is still performed often in Germany and elsewhere, etc., etc. Rationalizations, evasions, and half-truths. No wonder he doesn't want the responsibility of writing an opera. If he doesn't want to task himself with research on a simple article, he can't and won't handle the workload of an opera. End of story.

hegels advocate
July 18th, 2014
4:07 PM
It`s entirely irrational of Roger Scruton to say opera stands at the apex of our culture. No it doesn`t. From his false proposition all his other irrationals flow. He`s got hold of the wrong end of art`s ding an sich. Adele`s `Set Fire To The Rain` and Lana del Rey`s `Born To Die` and `Dark Paradise` are also philosophically remarkable. `Is That You,Darling?` by Royal Family&the Poor is pretty good too. Sampled vocals from a film femme fatale,Inna from Femen and a russian poet included. Available from Gothic Moon Records website.

Steve Meikle
July 18th, 2014
6:07 AM
Forget opera. A great symphony has all this without the sheer silliness that Doctor Johnson said was opera when he called it an irrational entertainment

Malcolm McLean
July 14th, 2014
9:07 PM
Surely Golding's novel is the high art, the opera a derivative?

hegel`s advocate
July 3rd, 2014
3:07 PM
Scruton can`t blame the Arts Council for its capitalist use of the term `opera` as a marketing category. Scruton is doing the same. That`s bureaucratic capitalism for you. The Youtube trailer is only 20 secs so we`ll have to wait until more is available. What would Scruton/Rudland make of `Clones` and `Are You Evil?` by Evil Blizzard (from Preston,Manchester)? (all on youtube) An entertaining future in music and philosophy? According to Suzanne Moore in the Guardian the Tory Party has no culture. Cameron prefers Cilla Black,Bruce Forsyth and foreign oligarchs round for his fundraising business-dinner meetings. Where is Michael Gove`s GUITARS NOT GUNS/MAKE ART NOT WAR campaign for the madrasas,mosques and schools ? In Islam Boko Haram is mandatory for the Caliphate but Procul Harum (and all western music)is banned. The Caliphate has declared its evil war on western civilisation. Are any tories (or any other politicians) not indifferent to the Tate exhibition `Kenneth Clark: Looking For Civilisation` ?

Anonymous
July 1st, 2014
3:07 PM
In fact, 'Pincher Martin' already is on Youtube (at least in trailer form): http://youtu.be/_mVeFKZ2iYc

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.