
A girl of 16 becomes the innocent victim of gangland violence and dies. On the Today programme, a shrewd and well-informed youth worker suggests that the killers expect that, if caught, they would be released from prison in two or three years.
The youth worker says this in such a way as to suggest that she thinks this too. The presenter does not correct her.
As the law now stands, the killers can expect to serve 30 years or more in prison, the equivalent of a 60-year fixed sentence at current rates of remission.
Since the government has laid down that such lengthy sentences must be passed to punish and deter, why doesn't it tell potential murderers before they kill people?
Post your comment
Joshua Rozenberg was the BBC's legal correspondent for 15 years. He moved to The Daily Telegraph in 2000, editing the paper's legal coverage for eight years. Now a freelance writer, commentator and broadcaster on legal affairs, he blogs exclusively for Standpoint.
- Shoesmith gets the Boot
- Self-hate in action
- American Jihadi Group Inspired by Awlaki
- First Fly, then Sue
- Fighting for their Lives
- How Much for a Life?
- Analysis: New Interview with Taliban Leader
- Why not "Lord" Dyson?
- Simon Singh Wins!
- Rights and Wrongs
- The Tyranny of Guilt
- BBC Music Mag Awards: The Winners!
- Why Court was Right to Grant ex-MPs Legal Aid
- Words for Music: Going Gold
- Update from Bishkek
- Amnesty Prefers Jihadists to Feminists
- Saturday Listening...
- Wagner: the Big Question
- Labour 1997-2010: a Verdict


















