You are here:   Blogs >Nick Cohen > Anyone but Balls (2)
Standpoint Blogs
 
 
Nick Cohen
Tuesday 25th May 2010
Anyone but Balls (2)

Does a sensible centre-left party - or come to that a sensible centre-right party - want to pick a leader from a vicious faction that was so lost in backstabbing and plotting that it could not recognise a crisis in capitalism when it was about to hit it in the chops?

Short answer:

No, it most certainly does not.

 

Long answer:

The Brownites' campaign to unseat Alistair Darling and replace him with Ed Balls revealed both the nastiness and stupidity of the old regime. The briefings by Charlie Whelan and Damian McBride against one of Brown's oldest friends in politics were standard practice, of course - it was always the Brownite way to betray an ally or stitch up a candid critic. You would never have guessed it from reading our tame press. Lobby journalists wanted then and still want now to stay in the loop. So they did not reveal how government propagandists fed them dirt stories from behind the coward's mask of anonymity. I found it very telling that when Guido Fawkes finally revealed what McBride was up to hardly anyone who relied on the Lobby for news knew who he was.

Darling's crime was, you may remember, to predict at the start of the crisis that we were facing the worst recession for 60 years. For this, the Brownites began a campaign of denigration, saying he was unfit for the job and should be replaced by Balls. If anything, Darling was guilty of understatement. We are in the worst economic crisis for 80 years.

Now, for reasons which make me despair, Balls, Whelan and the rest of the gang are regarded by press and punters alike as somehow being left wing. The dumbos who run Unite have allowed their union to become Whelan's plaything because he has convinced them that the Brownites are somehow more authentically left than any other faction in the Labour party.

Yet when he was at the Treasury with Brown, Balls was as guilty as his master in allowing the financiers to run riot. Like Brown, he forgot the inherited wisdom of social democracy that bankers can bring down the economy if governments are foolish enough to leave them to their own devices. More to point, when the bubble burst and the inevitable crash came, the Brownites could not see what was going on in front of their noses, but turned instead on Darling for daring to tell the truth about the disaster they had presided over.

Don't vote for them.

Vote for Miliband senior, Miliband junior, Burnham, McDonnell....anyone but Balls.

Read Part one here.

Join the Facebook Group here!

Tags:
 
Like this article? Share, save or print using the icons below
Delicious   Digg   StumbleUpon   Propeller   Reddit   Magnoliacom   Newsvine   Furl   Facebook   Google   Yahoo   Technorati   Icerocket   Print   Mail   Twitter   
Share/Save
 
 
 
Jez Sullivan
May 28th, 2010
12:05 AM
There is no one to vote for....

Andy
May 26th, 2010
9:05 AM
Ed Balls is the man the Labour Party needs for the future. Give the guy a chance!

Eeyore
May 25th, 2010
8:05 PM
Don and Chas are, IMHO, quite right ('vote for Balls!). Whilst our system does need a strong, centrist party to oppose the Tories, that party absolutely ought not to be Labour. It carries too much baggage of gerrymandering-by-patronage in its recent past, and too much of the Clause Four tendency more distantly. The best thing would be for it to collapse and for those emerging from the rubble to turn Left towards the SWP et al or Right, towards the LibDems. Balls with his Trade- Unionism-at-any-price, political myopia, lack of charm and general nastiness is only slightly less likely than McDonnell to bring about Labour's demise. MandelBliar presumably sensed Labour's essential long-term hopelessness when it invented NuLab, swapping unelectability-with-integrity for mendacious power-seeking, but that experiment is now discredited (one can only hope, permanently). Indeed, the boy Miliband Major declared as much t'other day. Why do the Tories need opposing? To keep them on their toes, to force them to think of national, rather than sectional, interests and to ensure that they continue to broadcast the message, somewhat muted of late, that small govt is better than big, that govt should do only the minimum necessary and that govt's greatest contribution to the national weal is to keep out of the way of decent people trying to lead honest lives.

Chloe
May 25th, 2010
5:05 PM
Mr McDonnell should not even be on the list, don't forget his previous history, I would guess that he was McBride's role model. Lets not forget that he had to pay his conservative opponent 15,000 pounds libel damages after smearing him in the eighties, lets also not forget his outrageous comments supporting the IRA and it's terror tactics....actually, he has all the correct skills to be the next Labour Leader.

barnacle bill
May 25th, 2010
4:05 PM
Blinky Balls has never had his politics forged in the furnace of everyday life, whether on the shop floor, or at the coal face. Instead during his pampered/sheltered life he has dipped into the sewers of NuLabor to further himself. If Blinky succeeds to the leadership of the Labour Party they will be led by a Billy Bunter of a figure and not the "John Smith" they need to lead them.

Don
May 25th, 2010
4:05 PM
N0!! Please vote for Balls!!

Chas
May 25th, 2010
3:05 PM
No, please vote for Balls. He alone can be guaranteed to sink the Labour party once and for all.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
 
About Nick Cohen

Nick Cohen is a columnist for the Observer. He is the author of Pretty Straight Guys, What's Left?, and Waiting for the Etonians. For more information and his previous blog, visit nickcohen.net

Recent Blog Posts
Blog List
More Posts
Popular Standpoint topics