And then the press come along — you see? I really don't like the look of that redheaded woman, though. Do you?

Never trust a redhead!

You're so right!

Well, they arrested her again. Didn't they?

They should lock her up for what she did to Milly Dowler. Seriously...And everybody else, too. Anyone who ever accepted the Murdoch shilling!

But not the Daily Mail bods!

No. Fair enough. But — I think  that one actually belongs to the Guardian family.

Oh God! Not the Guardian...Really?

Well. I'm fairly certain. Which I think is owned by Amnesty International.

Are you sure?

...No. Yes. Not sure. Is it?

I don't think so. Amnesty International's a charity, isn't it? Mostly. I don't think they own newspapers, per se. I think you're getting muddled with something else...I  thought J.K. Rowling was a bit OTT. Did you see her?

I didn't, no...But  if the press invaded her privacy, then they should pay for it. That's all. Slamdunk. Wham, bam, thank you ma'am. It's a zero-tolerance situation. If you ask me. Everyone has a right to privacy.

What about...Saddam Hussein?

Well. He's dead. Isn't he?

OK — no, but what about actual, legitimate, "investigations", quote unquote. Where wrongdoing is...sort of occurring...? Do you think journalists have a right to hack into phones under those circumstances? Because this is what's at stake. Isn't it? If journalists can't sort of go about their business...