You are here:   Text > Should We Know About our Leaders' Health?
You can't request more than 20 challenges without solving them. Your previous challenges were flushed.
 

However, surprisingly, Churchill made a remarkable recovery, chaired the Cabinet, again refused his family's advice to resign and, helped by Moran's stimulant tablets, made successful speeches to the House of Commons and the party conference: "If I stay on for the time being, bearing the burden at my age, it is not because of love for power or office."

For the next two years, he repeatedly promised Eden, his ministers and his family that he would resign soon, but always retracted. He gave up on 5 April 1955. Moran could have forced him to leave office but didn't. "I was, I think, alone in urging him to hang on, although I knew that he was hardly up to his job for at least a year before he resigned office. His family and his friends pressed him to retire; they feared he might do something that would injure his reputation. I held this was none of my business. I knew that he would feel that life was over when he resigned, and that he would be unhappy when there was no purpose in his existence. It was my job as his doctor to postpone that day as long as I could." 

Churchill lived for another ten years, and had further strokes. In 1958, Moran summoned Hunt to Chartwell because Churchill was semi-comatose, febrile with abdominal pain, jaundice, dark urine and pale stools. They agreed this obstructive jaundice was probably due to passage of biliary stones into the common bile duct. 

Pragmatically, Hunt and Moran did no tests or X-rays. They treated Churchill with antibiotics and he made a complete recovery. Hunt was again consulted in 1960 after a similar episode that was also resolved
after antibiotics.

Fifteen months after Churchill died, Moran published his Winston Churchill — The Struggle for Survival. It was acclaimed by historians, but bitterly criticised by Churchill's family and friends and by the medical profession for breach of confidentiality.

Clement Attlee had two illnesses that, although not life-threatening, did influence our nation. 

On 1 September 1939, Germany invaded Poland, whose sovereignty had been guaranteed by Britain and France. Parliament met the next day and the Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, spoke. Many MPs thought he wavered, and feared that instead of declaring war immediately he might be considering further concessions by Poland to Hitler. The Tory Chief Whip despaired. It was the turn of the Labour Leader of the Opposition to reply, but Attlee was sick, convalescing after an unsuccessful prostate operation. When his deputy, Arthur Greenwood, rose to speak, the Conservative MP Leopold Amery shouted out, "Speak for England!" Greenwood made the speech of his career, probably more effective than any Attlee would have given, ending: "I wonder how long we are prepared to vacillate at a time when Britain and all that Britain stands for, and human civilisation, are in peril. We must march with the French." 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anne Elborn
May 24th, 2012
10:05 PM
A very interesting article. Are you te Jeremy Baron I met at Alan Small's house in the early 50's@ I stillhave a book by Heine that you gave me

Dr Roderick Neilson
July 27th, 2011
10:07 PM
I think the post by 'anonymous' says more about him or her than it's content does. I worked for the Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland for 5 years. The use of clinical records by MDOs in medical negligence and GMC cases is covered by legal privilege, not patient confidentiality. If a doctor is accused of negligence or serious professional misconduct they have a right in law to access to relevant clinical records to answer the case made against them. As for the allegation that MDOs, lawyers and courts falsify and distort records, that smacks of sour grapes and failed litigation by Anonymous rather than fact.

Anonymous
January 23rd, 2011
4:01 AM
If Dr Neilson above was an advisor to a medical defence oragnisation (MDO), then he would know what a joke patient confidentiality is. MDOs routinely instruct doctors, expert witnesses and lawyers through the MDO medico-legal advisors to collude, with deliberate deception, against medical malpractice patients by falsifying their medical records, tests and radiographs. The Spine helps with this abuse of privacy, as do all electronic computer medical records. This deception and abuse of process goes all the way from the MDOs to the prejudiced rulings of medical boards and court judges.

Dr Roderick Neilson
December 7th, 2009
7:12 PM
I write as a practising consultant and a previous medical adviser to a UK Medical Defence Organisation. If Dr Baron is to believed St Mary's Hospital Medical School teaches and practices lower standards in relation to patient confidentiality than the Scottish University I attended. It is a step too far to suggest that the chequered medical histories of past politicians, all of whom are conveniently dead and thus cannot complain, means the public has a right to know the medical histories of current or would be current ones. I have little sympathy for most politicians but the fact they are politicians does not mean they have a lesser right to medical confidentiality than ordinary people. Neither does it mean that the GMC's position on medical confidentiality does not apply to their doctors. I'm sorry but Dr Baron's view that different standards should apply as regards confidentiality when politicians are patients is unethical and intrusive. Dr Roderick Neilson Consultant Haematologist

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.