You are here:   Features > The Operation That Can Ruin Your Life
 

 
A photographic exhibition at the Hammer Museum, University of California Los Angeles, shows a comparative study between teenage girls and adult male-to-female transsexuals 

Last year, I was nominated for the Stonewall Journalist of the Year award. This seemed fair enough since I write prolifically about sexuality and sexual identity. But I guessed that Stonewall would not dare give me the prize, because a powerful lobby affiliated with the lesbian and gay communities had been hounding me for five years. Six weeks later I, along with a police escort, walked past a huge demonstration of transsexuals and their supporters, shouting "Bindel the Bigot". Despite campaigning against gender discrimination, rape, child abuse and domestic violence for 30 years, I have been labelled a bigot because of a column I wrote in 2004 that questioned whether a sex change would make someone a woman or simply a man without a penis. Subsequently, I was "no platformed" by the National Union of Students Women's Campaign, a privilege previously afforded to fascist groups such as the BNP. As a leading feminist writer, I now find that a number of organisations are too frightened to ask me to speak at public events for fear of protests by transsexual lobbyists. 

The 2004 column was about a Canadian male-to-female transsexual who had taken a rape crisis centre to court over its decision not to invite her to be a counsellor for rape victims. Feminists tend to be critical of traditional gender roles because they benefit men and oppress women. Transsexualism, by its nature, promotes the idea that it is "natural" for boys to play with guns and girls to play with Barbie dolls. The idea that gender roles are biologically determined rather than socially constructed is the antithesis of feminism. 

I wrote: "Those who ‘transition' seem to become stereotypical in their appearance — f**k-me shoes and birds' nest hair for the boys; beards, muscles and tattoos for the girls. Think about a world inhabited just by transsexuals. It would look like the set of Grease."

Gender dysphoria (GD) was invented in the 1950s by reactionary male psychiatrists in an era when men were men and women were doormats. It is a term used to describe someone who feels strongly that they should belong to the opposite sex and that they were born in the wrong body. GD has no proven genetic or physiological basis. 

A review for the Guardian in 2005 of more than 100 international medical studies of post-operative transsexuals by the University of Birmingham's Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility found no robust scientific evidence that gender reassignment surgery was clinically effective. It warned that the results of many gender reassignment studies were unsound because researchers lost track of more than half of the participants. 

The past decade has seen an increase in the number of people diagnosed as transsexual. There are now 1,500-1,600 new referrals a year to one of the handful of gender identity clinics in Britain. About 1,200 receive treatment on the NHS with the rest going private, Thailand being the main country of choice. The largest clinic, at Charing Cross Hospital in London, saw 780 new referrals last year. The NHS carried out some 150 operations in the last year (up from about  100 in 2005-2006). Apart from Thailand, the country with the highest number of sex-change operations is Iran where, homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death. When sex-change surgery is performed on gay men, they become, in the eyes of the gender defenders, heterosexual women. Transsexual surgery becomes modern-day aversion therapy for gays and lesbians. 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
January 26th, 2010
9:01 AM
I like how the second page of this story read off a definition of transgender as an umbrella term and then the writer immediately switched to trans-sexual in their next paragraph as if they were interchangeable. Clearly, this person knows very little about trans-sexuals and especially transgender if it's assumed that binaries aren't being enforced by those with privelege.

Redstar Chimera
January 24th, 2010
11:01 PM
A lot of you are missing the point when you accuse Julie Bindel of being ignorant, some helpful souls have even pointed her towards "trans-101" type resources. She's not ignorant. The long and the short is that she needs something to write about, bigoted rants are the easiest articles to write that an author can then actually sell, and transsexuals are still considered to be a legitimate target for this kind of thing. Trust me, if she was capable of earning a decent living putting out honest, balanced articles then we would not be having this conversation.

Anonymous
January 10th, 2010
9:01 PM
I really dislike this post. There is something physical about transsexuality. Your body does not feel right and you want it to be different. I cannot fathom how you could have a problem with that. How on earth does it effect you? What right do you have to say that these people are just gay. That is so insulting. There are plenty of extremely feminine gay men, and they are not transsexuals. Transsexuals want to have the body of a woman (or man, as the case may be). I am really upset now.

Tracy
January 4th, 2010
2:01 AM
I have been living with the torment of transexualism all my life. This woman clearly has no idea what transexualism really is... I'm not going to write anything that wishes her ill in anyway, but I do hope that before she writes ANYTHING about transexualism ever again she pulls her head out of her butt and learns the truth first.

Issabella
December 22nd, 2009
1:12 PM
@Derek. Yes, you are sex that you are born. But don't confuse sex w ith gender. They are not the same thing. Transsexuals are people with a sex that is different to their gender. With today's current technology, it is not possible to change one's sex to match their gender, but we can change so that our sex LOOKS like our gender. Whilst it's not a 100% conversion, it is still better then nothing.

Issabella
December 22nd, 2009
1:12 PM
@Derek. Yes, you are sex that you are born. But don't confuse sex with gender. They are not the same thing. Transsexuals are people with a sex that is different to their gender. With today's current technology, it is not possible to change one's sex to match their gender, but we can change so that our sex LOOKS like our gender. Whilst it's not a 100% conversion, it is still better then nothing.

Dan
December 22nd, 2009
11:12 AM
'I wrote: "Those who ‘transition' seem to become stereotypical in their appearance — f**k-me shoes and birds' nest hair for the boys; beards, muscles and tattoos for the girls. Think about a world inhabited just by transsexuals. It would look like the set of Grease."' So, the fact that she is still quoting this phrase, and clearly still delighted by it, means, I assume, that even the tiny, grudging apology Julie Bindel managed in the face of the protests to the Guardian ("in hindsight, the sarcasm I used in my column was misplaced and insensitive") was totally insincere? Gosh, what a surprise.

Rosslyn Helen
December 17th, 2009
1:12 PM
Many have already critiqued this article. But just a thought on one assertion without evidence- the assertion in Ms Bindel's article that the Gender Recognition Act 2004 will have a profoundly negative effect on the human rights of women and girls. Has anyone - least of all Ms Bindel- noticed the year 2004. That is close on 6 years . Where I am (in NSW Australia) the Births Deaths and Marriages Act was amended in 1996 to allow recognition of change of sex . In South Australia ( the first in Ausralia to do so) -the legislation dates from 1988. So the where is the evidence for the diminution of the rights of women from such legislation (let alone the "profound effect").....this stuff has been around since last century.....the challenge to those who would deny trans people the basic human rights of recognition to a particular gender is to provide some evidence of harm or deficit to the individual or the polity. Its not as though this is so novel as to not allow for any meaningful analysis. In my view it is just basic human rights principles ......a deeper philisophical discussion about gender may be had - but the issue remains - in a society which legally defines irself in gender polarities- are you to deny the gender diverse access to a gender to which such a person identifies? And if so to what benefit ?

Mitzy
December 9th, 2009
10:12 PM
I am tg and I happen to agree with the author, to a point. I find it unsettling when other tg's insist on creating a false past--a past where they NEVER were male. This delusion is furthered by society's acquiescence to their demands for legal and linguistic instruments to rewrite biological and biographical history. In essence, reality is bent to their delusions. But this is where my agreement with the author ends. I would suggest that, like some other societies, we should recognize the transgendered sex, the third sex. Perhaps if we were less insistent on impersonation and more on inclination, we would recognize "the feminine male" and "the masculine female", allowing a broader spectrum of dress and behavioral mores that could accomodate this considerable population. Eventually, the need for "transition" would disappear, as there would be no definable place to need to transition to.

jess
December 8th, 2009
7:12 PM
Well, as one of the 780, all I can say is your understanding is woefully lacking. Come and walk a mile in my shoes. They are not f*** me boots by the way.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.