You are here:   Features > The Operation That Can Ruin Your Life
 

 
A photographic exhibition at the Hammer Museum, University of California Los Angeles, shows a comparative study between teenage girls and adult male-to-female transsexuals 

Last year, I was nominated for the Stonewall Journalist of the Year award. This seemed fair enough since I write prolifically about sexuality and sexual identity. But I guessed that Stonewall would not dare give me the prize, because a powerful lobby affiliated with the lesbian and gay communities had been hounding me for five years. Six weeks later I, along with a police escort, walked past a huge demonstration of transsexuals and their supporters, shouting "Bindel the Bigot". Despite campaigning against gender discrimination, rape, child abuse and domestic violence for 30 years, I have been labelled a bigot because of a column I wrote in 2004 that questioned whether a sex change would make someone a woman or simply a man without a penis. Subsequently, I was "no platformed" by the National Union of Students Women's Campaign, a privilege previously afforded to fascist groups such as the BNP. As a leading feminist writer, I now find that a number of organisations are too frightened to ask me to speak at public events for fear of protests by transsexual lobbyists. 

The 2004 column was about a Canadian male-to-female transsexual who had taken a rape crisis centre to court over its decision not to invite her to be a counsellor for rape victims. Feminists tend to be critical of traditional gender roles because they benefit men and oppress women. Transsexualism, by its nature, promotes the idea that it is "natural" for boys to play with guns and girls to play with Barbie dolls. The idea that gender roles are biologically determined rather than socially constructed is the antithesis of feminism. 

I wrote: "Those who ‘transition' seem to become stereotypical in their appearance — f**k-me shoes and birds' nest hair for the boys; beards, muscles and tattoos for the girls. Think about a world inhabited just by transsexuals. It would look like the set of Grease."

Gender dysphoria (GD) was invented in the 1950s by reactionary male psychiatrists in an era when men were men and women were doormats. It is a term used to describe someone who feels strongly that they should belong to the opposite sex and that they were born in the wrong body. GD has no proven genetic or physiological basis. 

A review for the Guardian in 2005 of more than 100 international medical studies of post-operative transsexuals by the University of Birmingham's Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility found no robust scientific evidence that gender reassignment surgery was clinically effective. It warned that the results of many gender reassignment studies were unsound because researchers lost track of more than half of the participants. 

The past decade has seen an increase in the number of people diagnosed as transsexual. There are now 1,500-1,600 new referrals a year to one of the handful of gender identity clinics in Britain. About 1,200 receive treatment on the NHS with the rest going private, Thailand being the main country of choice. The largest clinic, at Charing Cross Hospital in London, saw 780 new referrals last year. The NHS carried out some 150 operations in the last year (up from about  100 in 2005-2006). Apart from Thailand, the country with the highest number of sex-change operations is Iran where, homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death. When sex-change surgery is performed on gay men, they become, in the eyes of the gender defenders, heterosexual women. Transsexual surgery becomes modern-day aversion therapy for gays and lesbians. 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
November 15th, 2009
2:11 PM
In what way does the picture used to illustrate this article "show(s) a comparative study between teenage girls and adult male-to-female transsexuals"? Has it been manipulated to reflect average heights, skin colour, head size, and shoulder width of a significant number of the two groups? Or is it just a transphobic picture of one small young girl, and one broad shouldered, tall, woman? If it is the latter then of course it fits the article perfectly, but the caption would be misleading.

Frank P
November 15th, 2009
10:11 AM
I once arrested a homosexual street hooker who dressed as a woman to get a wider array of punters. This was of course in the days when depravity of this kind was illegal. Afterwards he had a three piece suite removal and a vinyl front entrance replacement at the Archie McKindoe clinic in Surrey, then applied and was granted a reduction of his two year sentence. On release heshe immediately resumed his street business, but became utterly bored with being straight and took up Lesbianism to further enhance his-her existence. He-she did however acquire a male ponce (or pimp as they incorrectly label sexual coercers these days - a pimp is a fixer not a bully , but American jargon always eventualy prevails); this led to some difficulty when we arrested the ponce for living on the earnings of prostitution; at that time he definition of a prostitute was 'woman who commonly offers her body for acts of sexual intercourse or lewdness for money'. This was when I discovered hat he-she had a vinyl fanny when the police surgeon examined her-him. What a mangled life they weave, when they practice to relieve.

Anonymous
November 14th, 2009
12:11 PM
> I ... will have to wait six > months or more for a brutal castration instead > of an ablation and the rest, because castration, > removal of my ovaries, uterus, tubes, only takes > about 45 mins of his time, so he can rush back > in to the more $ati$fying work -- creating you. None of the surgeons doing male-to-female surgery in the UK are gynecologists. It is a urological or plastic surgery speciality. So that's another transphobic lie, I'm afraid.

Anonymous
November 14th, 2009
2:11 AM
"All the new bits seem to work properly and I am perfectly happy with the outcome." Oh congratulations! If you were a real woman, the chances are they wouldn't, and you wouldn't be very happy either, when you tried to get them fixed. See the NHS budget for lady-parts surgeries is all taken up with you. For me, I have to wait months while the surgeon decides he can book me for my cancer surgery, and my breast reduction (needed to save my cervical vertebra from crumbling to dust). He's allowed to extra-bill for your kind of surgery, you see. It's so much more lucrative than scraping my tired, child-fatigued womb (ref: parts that worked properly). The NHS is trying to save money on surgery times too, so each surgeon only gets so many hours. Guess whose surgery they are going to do? Mine which pays the minimum, or yours, which they get paid four to eight times the rate? I finally gave up. I wear a neck brace, and will have to wait six months or more for a brutal castration instead of an ablation and the rest, because castration, removal of my ovaries, uterus, tubes, only takes about 45 mins of his time, so he can rush back in to the more $ati$fying work -- creating you. Enjoy your happy.

Anonymous
November 13th, 2009
9:11 PM
"With the normalisation of transsexual surgery comes an acceptance of other forms of surgery to correct a mental disorder. " This is the operative sentence in the whole article. When we accept mental disorder as a medical instead of a mental probelm, it leads to insanity..... Such as is outlined in the article.

Derek
November 12th, 2009
4:11 PM
Why on earth is society wasting time and resources on this pack of weirdos? You are the sex you are born and that's all there is to it. Sorry folks, you canm't always get what you want. What is it going to be next? head transplants onto animals?

Flashbuck
November 12th, 2009
2:11 PM
Bindel has got a point. I mean, the gender dysphoria thing is joke, because let's face it, gender dysphoria is the only so-called condition which is self-diagnosed. How can that be? How can the NHS or whoever accept gender dysphoria on that basis, eh? Self-diagnosis is no diagnosis.

Noctis
November 11th, 2009
10:11 PM
This article is amazingly offensive, bigoted, and tired. Bindel’s argument absolutely cannot account for the experiences of trans men like myself, nor the experiences of that majority of trans people who transition without surgery, nor for the many transgender folk who identify as gay/lesbian/queer after their transition. Really, it’s ludicrous. Bindel seems to assume that trans women’s transitions are about *her* rather than themselves–that they would endure all of the pain and discrimination they must suffer just to be able to attend some women-only feminist event with Bindel. How tedious.

KatieG
November 11th, 2009
2:11 AM
I'm a straight, married woman without gender dysphoria at all, but I find your point of view really offensive. I have no problem accepting people as the gender they feel they are, and it hurts no one to do the same. Try acceptance and support for people who deserve your compassion.

Sarah
November 10th, 2009
1:11 PM
Julie, all I can say is that living as a woman has eliminated all the angst and confusion that I experienced living as a man. Gender reassignment surgery simply seemed like the natural conclusion to the process of gender reassignment, since for me, it was the rendering of the incongruous into something that fits the bill. All the new bits seem to work properly and I am perfectly happy with the outcome. It's not a route to be taken lightly, but it's certainly not deserving of the spleen you have vented about the subject for the past few years. I have read some of your work on honour killings and rape and have a real respect for your views on these points, which makes it all the more puzzling why you feel the need to pick on a group of people who are picked on enough alreay - we hardly need you making it even worse. The evidence of a few dissatisfied customers should not negate the views of the uncomplaining majority who probably feel deeply offended by what you have said. A feminist of your reputation surprises me by the cheap way you stoop to stereotyping trans people, given that there are millions of men and women, born as men and women, who are just as happy to stereotype in their gender role as we sometimes are. I suspect one of the reasons we often try too hard (since we can't win either way with people like you) is to escape the ire of you and your ilk. I know from what I've read elsewhere that you largely oppose the stereotypical gender divide, particularly in its oppression of women. But it is those men and women born men and women who collectively persist in the male/female gender divide (watch a few hip hop videos to turn your feminist foresisters in their graves!), not the tiny number of transsexual men and women. You really do need to get a grip on your perspective. And as for the comparison of natal and transsexual women, well I suppose we are a bit bigger on average, given the fact that we've gone through a male puberty, but have you ever sat down to watch the world go by and look at the real diversity of women out there? Strangely, they come in all shapes and sizes, some looking far more masculine than I do, that's for sure. And the reason you didn't win the Stonewall award was not because of the opposition of the transsexual mob, but because you have yourself besmirched your reputation by pursuing what most people see has become something of a petty and unworthy vendetta. You simply didn't deserve it. It would have been like giving Fred and Rose West an award for their patio-building skills, a matter of consummate bad taste.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.