You are here:   Economy > They Who Speak for England
 

For a while, though, MacKay thought he could hang on. He held a public meeting in his Bracknell constituency from which he banned the national press and television cameras. As he left, he told the thwarted journalists that although, of course, there had been disquiet, three-quarters of attendees had accepted his explanations. His attempt at old-fashioned media management did him no good. Franck Marceteau, of the Bracknell Forest Standard, had upheld the finest traditions of journalism by slipping a camera into the meeting and uploading a video on to the paper's website the next day. 

The footage does not show that the English have turned into a know-nothing mob, ready to destroy anyone associated with the old order, as more fevered commentators believe. On the contrary, the Bracknell audience was infuriated by the decline of the values of the old order, which they had thought MacKay, a public-school boy who looks every inch an officer and a gentleman, embodied. "I think it's a very sad day," one middle-aged man told him. "I've been involved in politics for 20 years and I've always argued that it's a good vocation. We all raise children and grandchildren and try and instil moral values, and basically I think a number of you, you in particular, have been on the make." Repeatedly, MacKay's constituents emphasised the importance of the traditional value of equality before the law. "I employ accountants to do my books," said one man, who grew tired of MacKay's excuse that the fees' office had approved his expenses. "If anything goes wrong, it's me who goes to jail, not my accountant." They talked of the importance of "trust", "judgment", "a sense of right and wrong" and "living with your conscience". They did not want to subvert the system but blamed their MP for disgracing it. "Because of the action of people like you, we could end up with extremists." Throughout the hall, there was a deep sense that the political class had been taking the mickey. "You can't get away with this," said one speaker. "You are not entitled," shouted another.

The only speaker who did not follow tradition was a middle-aged man, who said that his 16-year-old daughter had come to him in tears and told him she had given her virginity to a boyfriend who had betrayed her. The audience giggled because the English middle classes are not meant to broadcast family secrets. But when he told MacKay that in trusting him he had trusted an equally worthless man, they agreed and applauded.

At last, a man stood up and connected the dots between Westminster and the City. "When the main challenge facing us is the credit crunch caused by greed," he cried, "how can you convince anybody that you are the right person to represent us?"

And that, surely, got to the root of it. However many honest MPs have been falsely accused, people know a systemic failure when it hits them. Politicians who are furtively enriching themselves will not worry about furtive enrichment in high finance. Nor will they act to stop the national debt piling up and quangocrats pocketing £250,000 a year for work that could be done as well by civil servants at one-quarter of the price. 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Matthew
July 16th, 2009
4:07 PM
Captain Stupendousness would look like less of a fool if he hadn't completely bowdlerised the quote from Egil.

Captain Stupendousness
July 3rd, 2009
2:07 PM
@egil Some people might read "multiculturalist hostility of the ruling classes toward western values" as the raving of some lower-class crank who was stupid and irresponsible enough to swallow the rhetoric pumped out by big-business, right-wing media. But not me. All I had to do was look at all the black and Pakistani people in the British parliament; clearly, you're on to something. Tonight, when you're out smashing the windows of Jewish-owned businesses, assassinating abortion doctors or whatever, I'll raise a toast to your fine efforts to keep us safe from everybody who isn't white. Cheers.

Will
July 3rd, 2009
1:07 PM
The trouble with these sort of arguments is that they all focus on 'greed'. The desire to do well in business is not unique to bankers, and it is also not something that can have an intrinsic upper bound - what the focus on greed implies is that there is some level of greed which is acceptable, but that bankers have overstepped that line. Clearly it is not for players in an economy to stand back if they believe they are doing too well, just as sportsmen do not concede points when their team happens to move into the lead. If greed - which is in essence a desire to increase a feeling of happiness or wellbeing - has no natural limit, why do we suppose some people should impose such limits on themselves. Clearly, some external factor has to do this. However, greed, in this case is also misrepresented as people are really refering to the recklessness which has come about as a result of greed. Attacking greed is ultimately futile and perhaps akin to attacking the human instinct for survival.

Dee
June 30th, 2009
1:06 PM
You could say about a Scottish MP, who has no democratic mandate to rule over England - "He's given himself powers above his station." Our rulers have proven that they have no interest in democracy, above their own Party interests. They disgust me. We are slow to rouse, merely grumbling for the moment, but when we blow our fuses over this, they'll certainly know about it. I'm not far off that stage myself.

Egil
June 28th, 2009
8:06 PM
The economy is only part of the reason why so many people distrust government. There is also the fanatical multiculturalist hostility that so many in the "ruling classes" feel towards traditional British and generally Western values. People see the fraudulence and unfairness of multiculturalism, but there seems to be little they can do about it.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.