You are here:   Economy > They Who Speak for England
 

In our present circumstances, I find my earlier Titanic analogy does not do justice to the behaviour of the British elite. It is as if the managers of the White Star Line had decided that there was no need to impose restrictions on the first-class passengers. They should, and indeed must, suspend the ship's rules because attempts to control the wealthy were not only futile but dangerous and contrary to the long-term interest of everyone on the liner. While the captain and his officers devote their time to finding ever more ingenious ways to pad out their expenses, the first-class passengers tire of drinking champagne in the Café Parisien and take control of the bridge. They steer the Titanic into an iceberg and run for the lifeboats. As they head over the side, they shout to the plebs in steerage that it is their responsibility to save the ship from sinking.

It says much about the essential good nature of the English that there haven't been riots in the streets.

Bracknell is in Middle England, the most misunderstood corner of the country. Conservative writers bellow that taxes on the wealthy are an assault on its values and aspirations and merely show how little they understand of their readers. The English middle class is not wealthy by the standards of elite London. The basic £64,766 salary MPs complain about does not put them in the middle of the individual income league but in the top three per cent of earners. If an MP has a partner making £30,000 a year, the couple is also in the top three per cent of household incomes. Those placings come before you add in the generous pension arrangements and the expense claims for moat cleaning and wisteria pruning.

The true middle class lives today in households which take in £40-£50,000 not £90-£100,000. Union militancy pushed their predecessors to the Right in the 1980s. The militant demands of the wealthy on taxpayers' purses ought to be pushing them leftwards now, the more so because the blow from the bankers came from nowhere, taking Britain from boom to bust within months. The 1970s were a miserable decade, and the hardship of the three-day week, rising unemployment and deadlocked government had prepared the ground for Thatcherism. Our generation received no warnings except from a handful of rogue economists, who were ignored by everyone who mattered. Psychologically and financially, we were unprepared.

The shop managers in Bracknell's ugly town centre and the IT technicians at Waitrose's head office there give no indication, however, that the shock of the crash will push them into embracing socialism or any version of it. With MacKay going, it looks as though they will vote Conservative again at the next general election and keep Bracknell one of the safest Tory seats in the country. They are not alone. In June's European election, parties of the Right prospered everywhere. I need to be careful about lumping them together because Angela Merkel's and Nicolas Sarkozy's criticisms of unregulated markets put them well to the "Left" of Gordon Brown. Nevertheless, it remains striking that propitious circumstances are not producing a left-wing revival in Europe.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Matthew
July 16th, 2009
4:07 PM
Captain Stupendousness would look like less of a fool if he hadn't completely bowdlerised the quote from Egil.

Captain Stupendousness
July 3rd, 2009
2:07 PM
@egil Some people might read "multiculturalist hostility of the ruling classes toward western values" as the raving of some lower-class crank who was stupid and irresponsible enough to swallow the rhetoric pumped out by big-business, right-wing media. But not me. All I had to do was look at all the black and Pakistani people in the British parliament; clearly, you're on to something. Tonight, when you're out smashing the windows of Jewish-owned businesses, assassinating abortion doctors or whatever, I'll raise a toast to your fine efforts to keep us safe from everybody who isn't white. Cheers.

Will
July 3rd, 2009
1:07 PM
The trouble with these sort of arguments is that they all focus on 'greed'. The desire to do well in business is not unique to bankers, and it is also not something that can have an intrinsic upper bound - what the focus on greed implies is that there is some level of greed which is acceptable, but that bankers have overstepped that line. Clearly it is not for players in an economy to stand back if they believe they are doing too well, just as sportsmen do not concede points when their team happens to move into the lead. If greed - which is in essence a desire to increase a feeling of happiness or wellbeing - has no natural limit, why do we suppose some people should impose such limits on themselves. Clearly, some external factor has to do this. However, greed, in this case is also misrepresented as people are really refering to the recklessness which has come about as a result of greed. Attacking greed is ultimately futile and perhaps akin to attacking the human instinct for survival.

Dee
June 30th, 2009
1:06 PM
You could say about a Scottish MP, who has no democratic mandate to rule over England - "He's given himself powers above his station." Our rulers have proven that they have no interest in democracy, above their own Party interests. They disgust me. We are slow to rouse, merely grumbling for the moment, but when we blow our fuses over this, they'll certainly know about it. I'm not far off that stage myself.

Egil
June 28th, 2009
8:06 PM
The economy is only part of the reason why so many people distrust government. There is also the fanatical multiculturalist hostility that so many in the "ruling classes" feel towards traditional British and generally Western values. People see the fraudulence and unfairness of multiculturalism, but there seems to be little they can do about it.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.