You are here:   Balkans > What Should We Do About Russia?
 

We also need to polish our soft power. Both the regime in the Kremlin, and ordinary Russians, are now deeply sceptical about any talk of Western values. They regard it as hypocritical hogwash. The West is somewhere where you can buy anything for money - just as long as you don't admit it. That is painfully true in some respects. But we can do something about that. In truth, the West still has plenty to boast about. The astonishing electoral feast of America's primary and presidential contests is a startling contrast to Russia's carefully manipulated parliamentary and presidential elections. Nowhere on the planet do governments look after their citizens' health and welfare better than in the EU. In Russia, public services and infrastructure, even after the oil and gas bonanza of the past decade, are still pitiful.

Even the financial crisis sheds a positive light on our system. It may be throwing up some wrong answers and even scapegoating the wrong people. But it is calling the powerful to account in a way that would be unimaginable in Russia. When things go wrong here, governments fall. When things go wrong there, it is editors who are sacked for reporting them. The great aim should be that when the Putin regime finally hits the buffers, Russians turn again westwards, rather than seeking something still more toxic and dangerous.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Riaz Ahmad
December 27th, 2008
9:12 PM
Edwards Lucas, your remarks: 'Russia is a repressive regime. But it is not bad enough to enrage our liberal consciences' If you examine international affairs, there is a constant and consistent pattern of hypocrisy, duplicity and double standards practiced by the west. If these are the attributes of your liberal conscience, then I agree with your remarks. As reality of international affairs bears out, your liberal conscience is no different to that of Russia's none-liberal variety. Both are subservient to serving the needs of vested interest.

Vernon Howell
November 13th, 2008
6:11 PM
Come now, Anonymous. Neo fascist is going a bit far, though by no means is Sakaashvili a democrat of course, in spite of attempts by his supporters such as Mr Lucas and the sixth formers in the UK government to soft-soap his image and conceal the rather obvious truth about him.

Anonymous
November 12th, 2008
1:11 AM
Huh? Didn't Russian troops leave Eastern Europe? Constructive engagement would be a much better policy than costly confrontation. Trust me, when the Bush joke is out of office, NATO will have to explain aspects of the Georgian aggression against Russia. Western media have served as player pianos for Saakashvili's neo-fascist regime. Orwellian Newspeak has shackled critical faculties in the West. Find a lie in this documentary, or shut up. www.war080808.com/

Anonymous
November 1st, 2008
9:11 PM
Lucas, strangely, has yet to publish this on his own blog. Perhaps this is due to the fact that it's - in parts - oddly out of sync with his usual froth. As for the money issue and Lucas, it is painfully easy to see it. He admitted last year on a blog called Marginalia that he writes for outlets for the Daily Mail _not_ to reach a different, painfully naive part of the British public, but for the cold, hard cash. One should also look up his wife's (Christina Odone) bit on the Guardian web site, also from about a year ago. There, she rails with evident envy, about the wealthy Russians now in London. It's a pathetic family affair.

Vernon Howell
October 29th, 2008
8:10 PM
What is to be done? Well, you can stop commissioning articles by this frothing Russophobe for a start, who never stops flogging his risible New Cold War schtick. It is in Lucas' benefit to talk this nonsense up of course as he has a dire book on the topic to sell. Cui bono, and all that.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Related content
More Features
Popular Standpoint topics