You are here:   Balkans > What Should We Do About Russia?
 

We should also send a clear signal that Russia's increasing espionage efforts in EU and Nato countries are most unwelcome. A co-ordinated expulsion by Britain, France, Sweden, Poland, Norway and the Czech Republic of a dozen embassy-based representatives of the SVR (foreign intelligence), GRU (military espionage) and most of all the thuggish FSB (internal security), as well as assorted "students", "bankers", "businessmen" and "consultants", would send a powerful signal to the Kremlin: that Western security planners are now seriously concerned with Russian efforts to subvert and intimidate us. It is these people who are bribing and suborning politicians, officials and businessmen, particularly in our energy industry, in order to smooth the ground for Russia's use of its huge gas and oil reserves.

The danger of delay is great. The longer we let Russia enjoy its feeling of impunity, the greater the risk that the Kremlin tries another stunt somewhere else. A vulgar analogy would be to see the Georgian crisis as the equivalent of Hitler's march into Rhineland. The danger is that the Baltic states fill the ill-fated role of Czechoslovakia in 1938; it is all too easy to imagine the West, divided and distracted by economic trouble and wars elsewhere, once again forcing an allied government to accept a noxious political settlement with its mortal enemy. Russian propagandists are already demanding, for example, a Russian "territorial autonomy" - in effect a Kremlin canton - inside Estonia. When Iceland, another strategically vital Nato member, saw its banks collapse, Gordon Broewn sued them; Russia offered a $4billion loan. The longer we go down that path, the nastier the price we will pay when we try to leave it.

Having bolstered our weaker allies and secured our own citadels, we should try a counter-offensive. The best place to do that is Belarus, now at great risk of a Russian Anschluss. We should be doing everything possible to open channels of communication with the regime there, offering it a safe and dignified exit from power in return for a strategic switch towards the West. Our previous policy, of showering the fragmented and highly-penetrated opposition with money and attention, has got us next to nowhere.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Riaz Ahmad
December 27th, 2008
9:12 PM
Edwards Lucas, your remarks: 'Russia is a repressive regime. But it is not bad enough to enrage our liberal consciences' If you examine international affairs, there is a constant and consistent pattern of hypocrisy, duplicity and double standards practiced by the west. If these are the attributes of your liberal conscience, then I agree with your remarks. As reality of international affairs bears out, your liberal conscience is no different to that of Russia's none-liberal variety. Both are subservient to serving the needs of vested interest.

Vernon Howell
November 13th, 2008
6:11 PM
Come now, Anonymous. Neo fascist is going a bit far, though by no means is Sakaashvili a democrat of course, in spite of attempts by his supporters such as Mr Lucas and the sixth formers in the UK government to soft-soap his image and conceal the rather obvious truth about him.

Anonymous
November 12th, 2008
1:11 AM
Huh? Didn't Russian troops leave Eastern Europe? Constructive engagement would be a much better policy than costly confrontation. Trust me, when the Bush joke is out of office, NATO will have to explain aspects of the Georgian aggression against Russia. Western media have served as player pianos for Saakashvili's neo-fascist regime. Orwellian Newspeak has shackled critical faculties in the West. Find a lie in this documentary, or shut up. www.war080808.com/

Anonymous
November 1st, 2008
9:11 PM
Lucas, strangely, has yet to publish this on his own blog. Perhaps this is due to the fact that it's - in parts - oddly out of sync with his usual froth. As for the money issue and Lucas, it is painfully easy to see it. He admitted last year on a blog called Marginalia that he writes for outlets for the Daily Mail _not_ to reach a different, painfully naive part of the British public, but for the cold, hard cash. One should also look up his wife's (Christina Odone) bit on the Guardian web site, also from about a year ago. There, she rails with evident envy, about the wealthy Russians now in London. It's a pathetic family affair.

Vernon Howell
October 29th, 2008
8:10 PM
What is to be done? Well, you can stop commissioning articles by this frothing Russophobe for a start, who never stops flogging his risible New Cold War schtick. It is in Lucas' benefit to talk this nonsense up of course as he has a dire book on the topic to sell. Cui bono, and all that.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Related content
More Features
Popular Standpoint topics