You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > The Loss Of Faith Made Music Mute
 
With all this in mind, therefore, we can start to comprehend those rare instances since the 1960s where some classical music worthy of our attention has been produced, and we should not be surprised to see that they have sprung most prominently from a Christian setting—in particular, the great tradition of choral music which continues in the Oxbridge colleges and cathedrals across England. The best examples include John Tavener's outstanding setting of Blake's "The Lamb", early insightful glances into what a composer like George Benjamin might have been in his magnificent "Twas in the year that King Uzziah died", the admirable liturgical output of Judith Bingham and Judith Weir, and the success of those two wonderful choral works, "Sleep" and "Lux Aurumque" by Eric Whitacre, suffused with his distinctive brand of American televangelism. In addition, another often-forgotten backwater is the world of wind and brass music which, given its ties to the Royal Family, the armed forces and (particularly in the case of brass bands) its commitment to the great Christian hymn tune, has allowed composers like Edward Gregson and Kenneth Hesketh to sneak past a few nationalist contributions which contrast starkly with their usual "squeaky-gate" output. With its tuba trills and macho melodies, Gregson's "The Plantagenets" for brass band masterfully evokes the passions and chivalry of the old English kings, whereas Hesketh's youthful "Masque" and "Whirlegigg"—which enjoy international renown—are straight out of the military banding traditions of Vaughan Williams and Holst. What all of the above examples go to prove is that modern composers do still have it in them, when they are brave enough (or innocent enough) to try; however, these examples still exist on the periphery of the musical establishment, which, as Glare—a new opera presented by the Royal Opera House last November—amply demonstrates, remains stuck in a self-hating modernist rut.

Things might be about to change, however, and I think I can suggest a few reasons why this might be: popular music has run out of steam. The young know this (several students of mine have testified to its truth); they admit that even the best that is on offer these days—the chilly sounds of Coldplay or the Arctic Monkeys—cannot compete with the energetic exuberance of, say, Abba, and that so much that is pumped out of the radio is now empty commercialism.

This decline, I suspect, relates back to the ongoing liberalisation of societies which began in the 1960s. The overthrowing of Christian chastity and discrediting of nationalism went hand in hand with the rights revolutions, which improved the freedoms of non-white races, homosexuals and women, and these causes were also reflected in popular music: hence, "[It doesn't matter if you're] Black or White" by Michael Jackson, "I want to break free" by Queen, or "Eleanor Rigby" by the Beatles. During this period, the young had a lot to rebel against, and many just causes to champion. Now, however, it is fair to say that, in the West. social norms have been established which condemn any form of discrimination based on race, gender or sexuality, and so the young have very little real to rebel against anymore, and the motivations and feelings which inspired so much great popular music, and which pushed the old authority of classical music to one side, have now run dry.

Instead, what has crept into our institutions of late—particularly in education—is a systemic lack of leadership and authority. So, in conservatoires and music departments, nobody teaches harmony and counterpoint any more, although this, as explained above, is fundamental to all Western music. What has happened here is that the baby has been thrown out with the bath-water, and an overshooting liberal agenda has jettisoned all that was of value from the past, as well as those things which needed changing—as Steven Pinker has aptly put it, the rights revolutions have now entered their "decadent phase".

We have now reached a point, however, where the rot has gone so deep that we can no longer afford to maintain the lie that modernism was ever worth much—and not just because the money is running out. With the many subversive and insidious forces of globalisation beginning seriously to undermine the legitimacy of the nation state, and with Christianity under attack from a new liberal bigotry which has made expressing Christian sentiments all but taboo in much public life, what we need now are forms of culture that will help us to shore up these foundations. However, this is only possible if we allow leadership and authority back into our artistic institutions, if we take a suitably compassionate pride in our national identity, and, without any awkwardness or shame, have belief in the value and virtue of our  Judaeo-Christian roots.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
March 3rd, 2015
3:03 PM
So contemporary music isn't 'Christian' enough? Seems like a fairly superficial treatment of an otherwise-interesting subject. Methinks the cause of classical music's shift in importance is quite complex, and is related to very many factors and events. So the notion that good tunes equal "Christian" and not-good tunes equal "atheist" is rather laughable. On a pure musical plane, one can only look at what Wagner and the post-Wagner crowd did to exhaust the harmonic possibilities of the twelve-note scale, leaving Schonberg and the rest to ask what could be done after Wagner. Factor in the whole history of the 20th century, including probably the greatest surge of interest in classical art music in western history, a proliferation of orchestras, opera companies, chamber music groups, etc. Add in the whole ability to record EVERYTHING and maintain private collections of these recordings. Add in the rise of popular music. Factor in the globalization of music to encompass musical tastes from around the whole world and not just Europe. Just start with those things. There are many others, but just start with those, and then you'll begin to understand why classical music has come to the marginalized state it occupies in popular culture today. I've come to see this as not necessarily good or bad. Just understandable. Will it resurge? Probably. Like any great art, its values are there to be discovered and uncovered and revealed to a new generation. Will it ever occupy the position it held in, say, the mid-20th century. I rather doubt it, and I say that as someone who grew up in this tradition and practiced the art in various forms over the course of my lifetime. To set up some 'Christian-Non-Christian' polemic seems naive at best and if not simply mistaken, certainly a very limited perspective on a question that probably has a much more complicated answer.

Rick Robinson
March 3rd, 2015
3:03 PM
I agree with much (let's say half) of what you publish here. Without critiquing what I disagree with, let me just say that my own compositions (cuttime.com) attempt to bring an American nationalism to classical music with urban pop and folk styles vaguely familiar to us. This is having a measurable impact on the audiences I play them for. "The genie is out of the bottle", to continue all the cliches. But there IS this chance to reframe the context for largely instrumental music as either spirituality or sexuality. The former is best done in a concert hall, a defacto sanctuary of music, and the latter in club, a sanctuary of secularity. Many of us in the Classical Revolution movement that began in San Francisco in 2006 are working to improve what is already working, albeit on a small scale.

John Evans
March 3rd, 2015
3:03 PM
A lot of the most interesting work by modern composers is hidden in plain sight, as BBC Radio 3's excellent 'Sound of Cinema' series has conclusively demonstrated week by week for a long time now.

Charles
March 3rd, 2015
2:03 PM
We have nationalism and Christianity to thank not only for great music and art but also for the Crusades, the Inquisition, the grisly 17th century religious wars and runaway stake-burnings, the two world wars, slavery, colonialism, the genocide of the Native Americans and the near-genocides of the Armenians and the Jews. So on balance perhaps we are better off without these social forces even though they inspired great art.

Kamathymous
March 3rd, 2015
2:03 PM
Brilliant , I liked the comments by Anonymous.

Anonyclaudiomous
March 3rd, 2015
7:03 AM
Mr. Rudland (et al) may enjoy this. http://youtu.be/Yot1zZAUOZ4

Zak44
March 2nd, 2015
11:03 PM
Interesting then, that so many great works on religious themes were written by composers either atheist or agnostic. Berlioz, Verdi, and Brahms (requiems); Janacek (Mass, The Eternal Gospel); Wagner (Parsifal), Vaughan Williams (Mass, edited The English Hymnal).

Tim Cavanaugh
March 2nd, 2015
10:03 PM
Not sure what Schoenberg is being blamed for here, but if irreligion is (as it seems to be) the author's explanation for the decline of popularity, something doesn't add up. Schoenberg had no choice but to take his religion very seriously, and the equation of religious discipline and musical discipline is at the center of much of his work -- most notably Moses & Aron, which amounts to a dramatic argument for the tonal row as the musical equivalent of God's will revealed through the commandments. It's certainly true that many or most people don't care for how it sounds, but lack of faith does not seem to explain that lack of appeal. As for the loss of nationalism, connection to the supernatural, direct emotional appeal and the other elements the author mourns, you can find them abundantly in the work of Jerry Goldsmith, Bernard Herrmann, John Williams and dozens of other Hollywood composers working in the period covered by this article.

FRANCIS SCHWARTZ
March 2nd, 2015
8:03 PM
Balderdash.

Derrick Norman
March 2nd, 2015
6:03 PM
How could you leave out the tunefull music of John Rutter? ost of it "faith" inspired.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.