You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > The Loss Of Faith Made Music Mute
 
With all this in mind, therefore, we can start to comprehend those rare instances since the 1960s where some classical music worthy of our attention has been produced, and we should not be surprised to see that they have sprung most prominently from a Christian setting—in particular, the great tradition of choral music which continues in the Oxbridge colleges and cathedrals across England. The best examples include John Tavener's outstanding setting of Blake's "The Lamb", early insightful glances into what a composer like George Benjamin might have been in his magnificent "Twas in the year that King Uzziah died", the admirable liturgical output of Judith Bingham and Judith Weir, and the success of those two wonderful choral works, "Sleep" and "Lux Aurumque" by Eric Whitacre, suffused with his distinctive brand of American televangelism. In addition, another often-forgotten backwater is the world of wind and brass music which, given its ties to the Royal Family, the armed forces and (particularly in the case of brass bands) its commitment to the great Christian hymn tune, has allowed composers like Edward Gregson and Kenneth Hesketh to sneak past a few nationalist contributions which contrast starkly with their usual "squeaky-gate" output. With its tuba trills and macho melodies, Gregson's "The Plantagenets" for brass band masterfully evokes the passions and chivalry of the old English kings, whereas Hesketh's youthful "Masque" and "Whirlegigg"—which enjoy international renown—are straight out of the military banding traditions of Vaughan Williams and Holst. What all of the above examples go to prove is that modern composers do still have it in them, when they are brave enough (or innocent enough) to try; however, these examples still exist on the periphery of the musical establishment, which, as Glare—a new opera presented by the Royal Opera House last November—amply demonstrates, remains stuck in a self-hating modernist rut.

Things might be about to change, however, and I think I can suggest a few reasons why this might be: popular music has run out of steam. The young know this (several students of mine have testified to its truth); they admit that even the best that is on offer these days—the chilly sounds of Coldplay or the Arctic Monkeys—cannot compete with the energetic exuberance of, say, Abba, and that so much that is pumped out of the radio is now empty commercialism.

This decline, I suspect, relates back to the ongoing liberalisation of societies which began in the 1960s. The overthrowing of Christian chastity and discrediting of nationalism went hand in hand with the rights revolutions, which improved the freedoms of non-white races, homosexuals and women, and these causes were also reflected in popular music: hence, "[It doesn't matter if you're] Black or White" by Michael Jackson, "I want to break free" by Queen, or "Eleanor Rigby" by the Beatles. During this period, the young had a lot to rebel against, and many just causes to champion. Now, however, it is fair to say that, in the West. social norms have been established which condemn any form of discrimination based on race, gender or sexuality, and so the young have very little real to rebel against anymore, and the motivations and feelings which inspired so much great popular music, and which pushed the old authority of classical music to one side, have now run dry.

Instead, what has crept into our institutions of late—particularly in education—is a systemic lack of leadership and authority. So, in conservatoires and music departments, nobody teaches harmony and counterpoint any more, although this, as explained above, is fundamental to all Western music. What has happened here is that the baby has been thrown out with the bath-water, and an overshooting liberal agenda has jettisoned all that was of value from the past, as well as those things which needed changing—as Steven Pinker has aptly put it, the rights revolutions have now entered their "decadent phase".

We have now reached a point, however, where the rot has gone so deep that we can no longer afford to maintain the lie that modernism was ever worth much—and not just because the money is running out. With the many subversive and insidious forces of globalisation beginning seriously to undermine the legitimacy of the nation state, and with Christianity under attack from a new liberal bigotry which has made expressing Christian sentiments all but taboo in much public life, what we need now are forms of culture that will help us to shore up these foundations. However, this is only possible if we allow leadership and authority back into our artistic institutions, if we take a suitably compassionate pride in our national identity, and, without any awkwardness or shame, have belief in the value and virtue of our  Judaeo-Christian roots.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Pete ByrneAnonymous
March 5th, 2015
9:03 PM
The zeitgeist changes and music changes. Classical music has simply become irrelevant in light of the world as it's lived in.

Tedd
March 5th, 2015
4:03 PM
I'm not sure I agree with the conclusion but, as an atheist, I agree completely with the rest of the article. Rather than try to explain these developments away, or mis-characterize the thesis as Christian-good/non-Christian-bad, other atheists ought to spend some time thinking about what will reliably help people see something larger than their own ego at work in their psyche, which is what Christianity (and other forms of spiritualism) can do, at their best. That is what elevates us above the "cheap thrills of recreational sex" and other shallow pursuits. And that is also what, despite its otherwise-extraordinary success, the Godless world has not yet been able to do.

amcdonald
March 5th, 2015
4:03 PM
Is Jeff Butler simply jealous ? How unbecoming and poor form of him. Critics who are not `rational actors` create negative publicity. Nothing in Standpoint has or is being co-opted. "If there`s one thing worse than being talked about it`s not being talked about at all."- Oscar Wilde.

Jeff Butler
March 4th, 2015
7:03 PM
@amcdonald, @Rick Robinson: What makes you think it is acceptable to co-opt this forum to shill your own music, couched in an otherwise utterly irrelevant comments? It's unbecoming, and poor form.

Anonymous
March 4th, 2015
3:03 PM
The title I feel is a bit misleading because while the author does talk about the lack of Christianity (which I disagree with) a good portion of it does talk about the atonality of music that SADLY is in vogue. For me, the decline of classical music is that the music is made for musicians...there isnt a human element anymore that people can connect to. Music is about connection. Such operas like Demandolx which is currently in development seeks to connect audiences again (www.opera-demandolx.com) and others that are trying hard to bring the classical music back to the people. There is a concept: bring the music to the people! Atonality and this John Cageism that is so prevalent today only succeeds with two things: 1. makes the audience feel they dont 'get it' and as such, they tune out, 2. strokes the composers ego for being 'cutting edge' which it really isnt anymore. I dont think it has to do with religion or nationalism. It has to do with creating music that is, in fact, music.

John Porter
March 4th, 2015
12:03 PM
Well, there's one thing clear from this essay, that the author has no interest in anything written in the latter part of the 20th century. There are many, who will put Steve Reich or Arvo Part up against any of those listed as active in 1900, including Mahler or Stravinsky. What is more, many of those composers are fading into oblivion. You're not going to hear much Janacek or Rimsky Korsakov performed today. The bulk of Saint Saens is pretty light weight. It's hard to afford credibility to an author so biased against music based on chronology.

pdq
March 3rd, 2015
9:03 PM
Hm. I was taught that one of the features of _classical_ music was that it _wasn't_ nationalistic; that's part of what made it classical. It's part of what classical means. Nationalism was a move away from the classical ideal.

Serge
March 3rd, 2015
6:03 PM
Interesting analysis, although perhaps over-generalizing. Is not much music even of the classical era under discussion motivated by other passions than nationalism and Christianity? For example: romantic love, the beautiful and sublime in nature, Enlightenment reason, the discoveries of science, the human condition in all its varieties, death (whether of others or in consideration of one's own death), etc. Also, no mention of composers like Arvo Pärt, Glass, etc? What of film composers, who have a tremendous influence? The rising neoclassical music, which fuses classical minimalism with the ambient electronic instrumental movement, which may itself may be considered a continuation of the classical tradition? I am also not convinced that the answer is a return to nationalism and Christianity as sources of inspiration; this seems like a regressive step. Finally, whereas admittedly much popular music focuses on the casual sexual relationship, this is not true of all. Much focus on idealized romantic love, for example, and many other themes. Regardless, thank you for this thought-provoking article.

Butch
March 3rd, 2015
4:03 PM
A much simpler view in my mind is that modern technologies have provided humans with instant access to almost everything in a non stop 24/7 electro-sphere of incessant and mostly irrelevant piping from which there is no escape. No time for absorption of material yet alone reflection, which is really what listening to classical music requires. A 3 minute sound byte is the maximum tolerance level, now lets move on.

Michael B.
March 3rd, 2015
4:03 PM
Yes, let's go back to that wonderful time when religion and the state were completely intertwined. I am sure that everyone is fondly remembering pogroms, the Thirty Years' War, the burning of Jews and heretics at the stake, and the persecution of scientists for stating that the earth revolves around the sun or that the theory of evolution explains many facts about the biology of humans. The interesting thing is that there are plenty of composers still writing religious music (Arvo Pärt and James MacMillan come immediately to mind), but they are doing so out of their own individual creative impulses (yes, and using variations on traditional tonality), rather than acting out of compulsion by the state.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.