You are here:   Dialogue > Will Germany be a Divided Nation Again?
 
 

DJ: The US has relatively open borders. Nevertheless, you have to endorse some essential values before you are allowed in and to become part of the society. The same is true for France. But not for Germany, which doesn't insist on values so much. Why is that?

KH: I suppose it has to do with Germany's historical trauma. Believe it or not, the Nazi experience has made us humble. We find it not so straightforward to state our values and insist on them as conditions of citizenship. Who are we, after all? Who are we to tell other people how they are supposed to live? As an attitude of tolerance, I think this is excellent. But it also makes us a little too shy and passive. There is simply no way around determining the core values of our community, and we also cannot escape defining the entry conditions. The first necessary step for us would be to grow more acutely aware of the essentials of our culture, to work out the values according to which we want to live, to strive for consensus, and to protect it.

NK: It is a pity that this attitude of tolerance and humility is being abused politically. Tolerance and openness are wonderful things in the cultural realm. All countries benefit from a cultural mix in their society, it broadens people's horizons. Just think of Turkey with its 77 million people, of whom 99.8 per cent are Muslims and just 0.1 per cent Christians. That's a catastrophe when you remember that the proportion of Christians in Turkey was once between 30 and 40 per cent. There has been a campaign to turn the country into a pure Turkish nation that virtually amounts to genocide. Instead of viewing this as a catastrophe and cherishing the more open, mixed German society as the better option, many Turks now come here and try to repeat the experiment in Germany. I just hope that Germany will never fall prey to this policy. Germany thrives on its openness and mixed culture. When we talk about the labour market, I'm not even sure Germany needed all the Turkish workers that have come in. But the immigration of workers is not so important today. For Turks to migrate to Germany nowadays, there are essentially two channels: either they seek political asylum, or they marry Germans or join their families here. This latter group consists mainly of people who have completely failed in their home country: they have succeeded neither at school nor in their profession. They have no training or qualifications, they stay entirely dependent on their families. Not only women, men as well are kept almost as slaves. They just get a little bit of pocket money. These people are not grateful for the free and democratic country that they have come to. They cannot be. They don't have any contact with it. They don't mix with Germans. They are confined to the old traditions that their families replicate in their hermetic parallel worlds. They live exactly as they lived in Turkey. There are also many who have liberated themselves from their narrow Turkish or Muslim identities. Perhaps half of those who live here want to integrate.

KH: How can we break this vicious circle that you describe? How can we raise the awareness of the value of individual liberty of these immigrants who are treated as slaves?

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
May 21st, 2013
9:05 PM
I don't find it very productive to speak of "the Muslims" - what about the successful and well-integrated Pakistanis and Iranians of Germany, who sometimes identify themselves by nationality, sometimes by religion, and sometimes both? That said, she raises valid points that the Muslim community shouldn't be so quick to dismiss, because it's very true that Muslim parents are much more imposing than non-Muslim parents, and that their clasp over children extends far beyond childhood in ways that are neither democratic nor acceptable by Western standards. Whether we should impose Western standards on every facet of Muslim life in Europe? No - look at Europeans abroad; they (variably) respect but do not adopt the values of their non-Western hosts, and to expect more would be unreasonable. Whether the government should interfere where human rights are violated, as in the case of forced marriages? Yes. I personally wouldn't insist that religious communities adopt secularism if they ensured the safety and well-being, at the very least, of non-religious individuals. Unfortunately, this isn't always the case with Islam; where you aren't killed for apostasy, your family abandons you - or worse.

Anonymous
March 5th, 2011
2:03 PM
Although Mrs Necla Kelek's word could land as a harsh, she makes sense. I am a Turk and Muslim and religion has a role to empower the individual. The current version where individual empowerment is lost , where the system takes control is may be incorrectly but for the right reasons displayed as similar to socialism. Whats happening nowadays in many Middle Eastern countries is that individuals are taking power. Its exciting and inspiring. No system on its own can overcome the power of its members. It doesnt work. Communism doesnt work, religious governments also dont work. The gap between developed and developing world will continue to narrow and a system based on individuals rights will arise. Its time for democracy and freedom for every person, be it Muslim, Christian or non believer. We will live in harmony.

Anonymous
February 23rd, 2011
12:02 PM
It's interesting to read the comments by 'Turkish Voice' and Yalcin. I assume that they are Muslim and (possibly also) Turkish. Necla Kelek clearly is a reasoned and reasonable woman, well versed in German, Turkish and specifically Muslim culture. Yet the two Muslim commentators call her 'rude' and 'ignorant', hateful of her own (i.e. the Muslim part) 'people, religion, culture and history' - ending by claiming she's not a Turk or a Muslim in 'the true sense'. How very illuminating. The knee-jerk hostility, the dismissal of any and all reasonable arguments, the dogmatism and finally the assertion that she's not a 'real' Muslim anyway - all beutifully confirms Kelek's argument about what's wrong with the Muslim mindset. Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

julio
February 14th, 2011
1:02 PM
"Germany's historical trauma"??? HAH, germans dont give a damn his historical "trauma"

Anonymous
February 9th, 2011
7:02 AM
The first two commentators have proven Ms. Kelek right about her views.

Yalçın
January 28th, 2011
6:01 AM
All remarks pointed out by Kelek about Islam and Turkey are absolutely senseless and incorrect. She is either fully ignorant or biased concerning Muslims and Turkish culture and society. Her consultation, suggestions, view,etc about Turkish state, population, religion should be avoided by all costs because she is everything but for sure not Turkish and Muslim in true sense.

Turkish voice
January 27th, 2011
5:01 PM
I am quite disappointed about N Kele's remarks concerning Turkey and Islam. It seems that she has no idea at all what Islam and Turkish culture are made of. All of her words, view, and conclusions completely contradicts with Turkish society, government, policy, and etc. Her hate against her own people, religion, culture, history is rather thought-provoking and biased. Therefore, she cannot act as a refree, advisor, authority and consultant on any issue regarding Turkey and Islam. Poor, ignorant, rude woman, she is everything but for sure she represents neither a Turk nor a Muslim.

Tom Phillips
January 6th, 2011
10:01 PM
Anonymous of 8.12 on 31/12/2010( whom I take to be a German from his use of English) has even more to complain of than he thinks :the correct quotation about the purpse of NATO is " to keep the Russians out , the Americans in and the Germans down!"

Anonymous
December 31st, 2010
8:12 PM
In an US-anouncement we have seen following the German flag: Germany - Languages: German, Turkish! As you see this example shows the influence of both US and British interests, which want to have Turkey inside the European Communtiy, as well as the EU-leadership and most of the member countries! Guess: the want to have Turkey inside the EU for weaking Germany, as the history shows in NATO-development: Lord Ismay, British-first Secretary General inside stated the NATO was founded to have the Russians out and the Germans in!

Anonymous
December 31st, 2010
6:12 PM
A question: isnt Karen Horn correspondent of the "Frankfurter Allgemeine" at Moscow, and if, why does she support Necla Kelek and not the corres= pondent of that newspaper stationed at Ankara or Istanbul?

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.