You are here:   Dispatches > Teaching China's Anglophiles
 

In a country that has next to no immigration and a certified nationalism, my students found the British concept of multiculturalism quite baffling. In China, you are either Chinese or you are called a "foreigner"; they do not go in for nuanced classifications or politically correct language. 

Their knowledge of Margaret Thatcher owed much to her Hollywood portrayal by Meryl Streep, although they could not understand what all the fuss was about when it came to her battles of the 1980s. When viewed in the context of China's tumultuous postwar history, this was something I was prepared to concede. One aspect did shock them however: the "Thatcher, milk snatcher" episode. For a nation obsessed with calcium (evident if you visit any Chinese supermarket), taking away free milk from children was considered much more reprehensible than sending the police to quash the miners. 

For their final task, I asked them to prepare a talk on a "Great Briton" from the 20th century. I entreated them to go beyond the obvious, and this they did. One student selected the ethical socialist R.H. Tawney, not only for his contribution to English socialism but also for his 1920s account of Chinese feudalism. Another chose the sociologist Anthony Giddens, explaining why his beloved "middle way" was the only way for China. More movingly, one student nominated Bobby Charlton, recounting how in times of trouble his father always extolled the example of Charlton for the way he survived the Munich air crash and became England's greatest footballer.

The outstanding presentation was on D.H. Lawrence, in which the student talked about the writer's depiction of the dehumanising effects of industrialisation and offered the class a rather explicit retelling of Lady Chatterley's Lover

In our final session, I posed the question: was Britain's story one of progress or decline? They voted overwhelmingly for the latter. But it was not as simple as that. Britain may have lost an empire but had found a role as a global cultural force.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
sd goh
September 28th, 2013
11:09 AM
Eliza Filby, pardon me for bringing up this point about China being more "a continent than a nation/country." I think it was Bertrand Russell also who mentioned this in his 1922 book 'The Problem of China'. I would like to think that during your time there, albeit a brief one, you most likely would not have encountered this phenomenon which Russell found quite amusing. And that is, at his lectures there, notable Chinese intellectuals would scramble to sit at the back of the hall than in front, to avoid sticking out conspicuously. This low-profile stance could be said to be due to the Taoist teachings in which 'self-effacing' conduct is a marked one .

Ceri Morgan
September 27th, 2013
8:09 AM
Thanks Eliza - this drew a really good picture of the students you taught. I've visited China many times in the last 20 years and have worked for and with Chinese companies, and you'll be pleased to know that the answering of mobiles in meetings is not confined to the young: 40-something business execs do it all the time as well. You quote Martin Jacques, and he is very quotable, but have ever actually learned anything useful from him? His advocacy of China is on the face of it positive, but I do not believe that his big idea, the European Nation State vs. the Chinese Civilisation State, is either accurate or useful, and like badly woven silk it falls to pieces under rigorous examination.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics